Analytic Study of the Tadoma Method
1982; American Speech–Language–Hearing Association; Volume: 25; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1044/jshr.2502.216
ISSN1558-9102
AutoresCharlotte M. Reed, Mary Jo Doherty, Louis D. Braida, N. I. Durlach,
Tópico(s)Tactile and Sensory Interactions
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Jun 1982Analytic Study of the Tadoma MethodFurther Experiments with Inexperienced Observers Charlotte M. Reed, Mary Jo Doherty, Louis D. Braida, and Nathaniel I. Durlach Charlotte M. Reed Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Google Scholar More articles by this author , Mary Jo Doherty Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Google Scholar More articles by this author , Louis D. Braida Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Google Scholar More articles by this author and Nathaniel I. Durlach Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2502.216 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Results are presented for two studies of speechreading through the Tadoma method using normal subjects with simulated deafness and blindness. In the first study, subjects received training on the identification of consonant and vowel stimuli through Tadoma. In posttraining tests, an average score of 73% was obtained on a set of 24 consonants presented in CV syllables, and an average score of 82% was obtained on a set of 15 vowels and diphthongs presented in /g/-V-/d/ syllables. An analysis of the confusion matrices derived from the identification tests in terms of various articulatory/phonological features indicated that the features place, voicing, frication, and round were well-perceived for consonants and round, tense, vertical lip separation, and low, for vowels. In the second study, subjects received training through Tadoma on comprehension of sentences composed of words from a 43-item vocabulary. In tests for which sentence stimuli were repeated until a correct response was obtained, the subjects identified an average of 30% of the words correctly on the first presentation and required an average of roughly four presentations for complete identification of the stimulus. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research35:2 (450-465)1 Apr 1992Analytic Study of the Tadoma MethodCharlotte M. Reed, William M. Rabinowitz, Nathaniel I. Durlach, Lorraine A. Delhorne, Louis D. Braida, Joseph C. Pemberton, Brian D. Mulcahey and Deborah L. WashingtonJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research33:4 (786-797)1 Dec 1990A Study of the Tactual and Visual Reception of FingerspellingCharlotte M. Reed, Lorraine A. Delhorne, Nathaniel I. Durlach and Susan D. Fischer Volume 25Issue 2June 1982Pages: 216-223 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Dec 15, 1980Accepted: May 11, 1981 Published in issue: Jun 1, 1982 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1982 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)