Cytology and Interspecific Hybridization
2013; Linguagem: Inglês
10.2134/agronmonogr35.c10
ISSN2156-3276
Autores Tópico(s)Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
ResumoChapter 10 Cytology and Interspecific Hybridization C. C. Jan, C. C. Jan USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, North DakotaSearch for more papers by this author C. C. Jan, C. C. Jan USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, North DakotaSearch for more papers by this author Book Editor(s):Albert A. Schneiter, Albert A. SchneiterSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 January 1997 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr35.c10Citations: 11Book Series:Agronomy Monographs AboutPDFPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShareShare a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Summary In the past two decades, continuing efforts to understand basic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cytology, species relationships, and interspecific hybridization have provided useful information, technology, as well as valuable germplasms for the improvement of cultivated sunflower. Improved embryo culturing procedures facilitated interspecific hybridization, especially the extremely difficult crosses between perennial diploid Helianthus species and cultivated lines. This chapter presents significant contributions in the field of sunflower cytology, cytogenetics, and interspecific hybridization from 1978 to the present. It discusses sunflower genomes are discussed using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content, mitoticmetaphase karyotype, and variation in chromosome numbers. Microsporogenesis and megasporogenesis are discussed in both normal fertile material, as well as in less fertile interspecific hybrids and in male-sterile plants. The chapter also talks about Interspecific hybridization with respect to interspecific relationship, genomic differentiation, fertility restoration, and gene transfer. References Alexander, P. 1969. Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen. Stain technol. 44: 117–122. 10.3109/10520296909063335 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar Al-Allaf, S. and M. B. E. Godward 1977. Karyotype analysis of four varieties of Helianthus annuus . L Cytologia. 44: 319–323. Google Scholar Anashchenko, A. V. 1972a. Methods for developing hybrid sunflower involving chemical castration. Proc. 5th Int. Sunflower Conf.Clermont-Ferrand, France25–29 JulyInt. Sunflower Assoc., Paris, France. 229–230. Google Scholar Anashchenko, A. V. 1972b. A study of male sterility in the sunflower. Tr. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Sci. 46: 120–131.(In Russian.) Google Scholar Anashchenko, A. V., T. V. Mileeva, and V. T. Rozhkova 1974. Trudy pro priklandnoi botanike. Genet. Selek. 53: 242–254. Google Scholar Anderson, L. K., S. M. Stack, M. H. Fox, and Z. Chuanshan 1985. The relationship between genome size and synaptonemal complex length in higher plants. Exp. Cell Res. 165: 367–378. Google Scholar Atlagic, J. 1990. Pollen fertility in some Helianthus L.species and their Fl hybrids with the cultivated sunflower. Helia. 13: 47–54. Google Scholar Atlagic, J., B. Dozet, and D. Skoric 1993. Meiosis and pollen viability in Helianthus tuberosus L.and its hybrids with cultivated sunflower. Plant Breed. 111: 318–324. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00648.x CASGoogle Scholar Beatley, J. C. 1963. The sunflowers (genus Helianthus) in Tennessee. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 38: 135–154. Google Scholar Beglaryan, N. P. 1970. Some cytological characteristics of a sunflower mutant induced with gibberellic acid. Tsitol. Genet. 4: 547–552.(In Russian.) Google Scholar Bennett, M. D., J. B. Smith, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison 1982. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 216: 179–199. 10.1098/rspb.1982.0069 CASADSWeb of Science®Google Scholar Boeshore, M. L., M. R. Hanson, and S. Izhar 1985. A variant mitochondrial DNA arrangement specific to Petunia stable sterile somatic hybrids. Plant. Mol. Biol. 4: 125–132. 10.1007/BF02418759 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Bohorova, N., A. Atanossov, and J. Georgieva-Todorova 1981. Results from applying the tissue culture method in the genus Helianthus (In Bulgarian.) Genet. Tzitogen Rastne. Mater. Rauch. Sesia. 290–300. Google Scholar Brown, G. G., H. Russey, and L. J. DesRosiers 1986. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA, chloroplast DNA, and double-stranded RNA in fertile and cytoplasmic male-sterile sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 28: 121–129. 10.1139/g86-016 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Campos, F. A. 1974. p. 349–351. In A. V. Vranceanu (ed.) The use of ethrel in the induction of male sterility in sunflower. Proc. 6th Int. Sunflower Conf.Bucharest, Romania22–24 JulyInt. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. Google Scholar Cauderon, Y. 1965. Analyse cytogénétique d'hybrides entre Helianthus tuberosus et H.annuus. Conséquences en matiére de sélection. Ann. Amélior. Plant. 15: 243–261. Web of Science®Google Scholar Chandler, J. M. 1991. Chromosome evolution in sunflower. p. 229–249. In T. Tsuchiya, and P.K. Gupta (ed.) Chromosome engineering in plants: Genetics, breeding, evolution. Part B. Elsevier Sci. Publ. B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar Chandler, J. M. and B. H. Beard 1983. Embryo culture of Helianthus hybrids. Crop Sci. 23: 1004–1007. 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300050046x Web of Science®Google Scholar Chandler, J. M., C. C. Jan, and B. H. Beard 1986. Chromosomal differentiation among the annual Helianthus species. Syst. Bot. 11: 354–371. 10.2307/2419126 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Christov, M. 1990a. Study of wild species of the Helianthus genus in view of their use in sunflower breeding. Ph.D. diss. Agri. Acad. Sci, Sofia, Bulgaria.(In Bulgarian.) Google Scholar Christov, M. 1990b. A new source of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower originating from Helianthus argophyllus . Helia. 13: 55–62. Google Scholar Christov, M. 1992. New sources of male sterility and opportunities for their utilization in sunflower hybrid breeding. Helia. 15: 41–18. Google Scholar Christov, M. 1994. Identification, study and utilization in breeding programs of new CMS sources. FAO technical meeting on sunflower. p. 12. In Proc. 1994 FAO Sunflower Subnetwork Progress Rep., Montpellier, France. 2-23 June. FAO, Rome. Google Scholar Clevenger, S. and C. B. Heiser 1963. Helianthus laetiflorus and Helianthus rigidus- hybrids or species?. Rhodora. 65: 124–133. Google Scholar Crouzillat, D., L.de la Canal, A. Perrault, G. Ledoigt, F. Vear, and H. Serieys 1991. Cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower: Comparison of molecular biology and genetic studies. Plant Mol. Biol. 16: 415–426. 10.1007/BF00023992 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Crouzillat, D., P. Leroy, A. Perrault, and G. Ledoigt 1987. Molecular analysis of the mitochondria genome of Helianthus annuus in relation to cytoplasmic male sterility and phylogeny. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 773–780. 10.1007/BF00247556 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Denat, J-F., M. Coumans, H. Serieys, and R. Jonard 1991. Definition dun milieu de culture permettant le développement démbryons immatures de toumesol de 3 jours. Applicaiton á lóbtention d'hybrides interspécifiques. C. R. Seances Acad., Ser. 3. 313: 145–151. Google Scholar Dewey, D. R. 1980. Some applications and misapplications of induced polyploidy to plant breeding. p. 445–470. In W. H. Lewis (ed.) Polyploid: Biological relevance. Plenum Publ. Corp, New York. Google Scholar Dewey, R. E., C. S. Levings III, and D. H. Timothy 1986. Novel recombinations in the maize mito- chondrial genome produce a unique transcriptional unit in the Texas male-sterile cytoplasm. Cell. 44: 439–449. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90465-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Dhesi, J. S. and R. G. Saini 1973. Cytology of induced polyploids in sunflower. Nucleus. 16: 49–52. Google Scholar Dixon, L. K., C. J. Leaver, R. I. S. Brettell, and B. G. Gengenbach 1982. Mitochondrial sensitivity to Drechslera maydis T-toxin and the synthesis of a variant mitochondrial polypeptide in plants derived from maize tissue cultures with Texas male-sterile cytoplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63: 75–80. 10.1007/BF00303496 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Enns, H., D. G. Dorrell, J. A. Hoes, and W. O. Chubb 1970. Sunflower research, a progress report. Proc. 4th Int. Sunflower Conf., Memphis, TN. 23-25 June. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 162–167. Google Scholar Espinasse, A, C. Lay, and C. D. Dybing 1985. Factors controlling in vitro development of sunflower embryos. Agronomie. 5: 825–832. 10.1051/agro:19850909 Web of Science®Google Scholar Fick, G.N. and J.F. Miller 1997. Sunflower breeding. p. 395–439. In A.A. Schneiter (ed.) Sunflower technology and production. Agron. Monogr. 35. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. Web of Science®Google Scholar Gamborg, O. L., R. A. Miller, and K. Ojima 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Geisler, F. 1931. Chromosome numbers in certain species of Helianthus. Butler Univ. Bot. Stad. 11: 53–62. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, J. 1984. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Helianthus. L.Z. Pflanzenzuchtg. 93: 265–279. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, I. D. and N. E. Bohorova 1980. Karological investigation of the hybrid Helianthus annuus L.(2n=34) x Helianthus hirsutus Ralf. (2n=68). C. R. Acad. Agric. G. Dimitrov. 7: 961–964. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, J. and N. Bohorova 1979. Studies on the chromosomes of two Helianthus L.tetraploid species. Caryologia. 32: 335–347. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, J. and M. Lakova 1978. Karyological study of Helianthus salicifolius. The Nucleus. 21: 60–64. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1969. The effect of x-rays on chromosome aberrations in Helianthus annuus L.(In Bulgarian.). Genet. Sel. 2: 469–476. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1970. Zytogenetische Untersuchung der Hybriden Helianthus argophyllus x H.annuus. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 64: 357–366. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1971. Meiosis in Helianthus rigidus Desf. C. R. Seances Acad. Agric. Bulgaria. 4: 407–411. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1972. A study of the compatibility between some species in the genus Helianthus (section "Divaricati"). C. R. Acad. Agric. G. Dimitrov. 5: 283–289. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1974a. A new male sterile form of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). p. 343–347. In A. V. Vranceanu (ed.) Proc. 6th Int. Sunflower Conf., Bucharest, Romania. 22-24 July. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1974b. Cytological study of two tetraploid Helianthus species (2n = 68). C. R. Acad. Agric. G. Dimitrov. 7: 43–48. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. 1983. Hybridization between Helianthus annuus L.(2n=34) and Helianthus resinosus Small (2n=102). C. R.Acad. Bulgare Sci. 36: 963–966. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. and M. Lakova 1979. Hybridization of diploid sunflower, Helianthus annu us (2n=34) with some tetraploid Helianthus species. Plant Breed. 83: 340–349. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y., M. Lakova, and D. Spirkov 1974. Karyologic study of Helianthus mollis L. C. R. Acad. Agric. G. Dimitrov. 7: 59–62. Google Scholar Georgieva-Todorova, Y. and V. Nuti 1969. Chromosome aberrations in Helianthus annuus L.induced by 8-ethoxycaffeine. C. R. Seances Acad. Agric. Bulgaria. 2: 225–230. Google Scholar Gundaev, A.I 1971. Basic principles of sunflower selection. Genetic principles of plant selection. Nauka, Moscow. 417–465. Google Scholar Gupta, S. K. and S. K. Roy 1979. Colchiploid sunflower. Sci. Cult. 46: 294–295. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1947. Hybridization between the sunflower species Helianthus annuus and H.petiolaris. Evolution. 1: 249–262. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1947.tb02722.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1948. Taxonomic and cytological notes on the annual species of Helianthus. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 75: 512–515. 10.2307/2481785 Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1949. Study in the evolution of the sunflower species Helianthus annuus and bolanderi. Univ. California Publ. Bot. 23: 157–196. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1951a. Hybridization in the annual sunflowers: Helianthus annuus and H.debilis var. cucumerifolius. Evolution. 5: 42–51. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1951.tb02758.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1951b. Hybridization in the annual sunflowers: Helianthus annuus and H.argophyllus. Am. Nat. 85: 65–72. 10.1086/281651 Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1954. Variation and subspeciation in the common sunflower, Helianthus annuus. Am. Midl. Nat. 51: 287–305. 10.2307/2422222 Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1956. Biosystematics of Helianthus debilis. Madrono. 13: 145–176. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1958. Three new annual sunflowers (Helianthus) from the southwestern United States. Rhodora. 60: 272–283. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1960. A new annual sunflower, Helianthus deserticola ,from the southwestern United States. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 70: 209–211. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1961. Morphological and cytological variation in Helianthus petiolaris with notes on related species. Evolution. 15: 247–258. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03147.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1965. Species crosses in Helianthus. III. Delimitation of sections. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 52: 364–370. 10.2307/2394798 Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. 1982. Registration of Indiana 1 CMS sunflower germplasm. Crop Sci. 22: 1089. 10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200050060x Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B., W. C. Martin, and D. M. Smith 1962. Species crosses in Helianthus. I. Diploid species. Brittonia. 14: 137–147. 10.2307/2805218 Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. and D. M. Smith 1955. New chromosome numbers in Helianthus and related genera (Compositae). Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 64: 250–253. Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. and D. M. Smith 1960. The origin of Helianthus multiflorus. Am. J. Bot. 47: 860–865. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1960.tb07177.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Heiser, C. B. and D. M. Smith 1964. Species crosses in Helianthus: II. Polyploid species. Rhodora. 66: 344–358. Google Scholar Heiser, C. B., D. M. Smith, S. B. Clevenger, and W. C. Martin 1969. The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Mem. Torrey Bot. Club. 22: 1–219. Google Scholar Horner, H. T. 1977. A comparative light- and electron-microscopic study of microsporo-genesis in male-fertile and cytoplasmic male-sterile sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Am. J. Bot. 64: 745–759. 10.2307/2441727 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ingle, J. H., J. N. Timmus, and J. Sinclair 1975. Relationship between satellite deoxyribonucleic acid, ribosomal acid gene redundancy, and genome size in plants. Plant Physiol. 55: 496–501. 10.1104/pp.55.3.496 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Iuoras, M., A. V. Vranceanu, and F. M. Stoenscu 1989. Research regarding sunflower pollen fertility restoration of the source of cytoplasmic male sterility Fundulea 1. Anal. I.C.C.P.T. 57: 41–46. Google Scholar Izhar, S., M. Schlicter, and D. Swartzberg 1983. Sorting out of cytoplasmic elements in somatic hybrids of Petunia and the prevalence of the hetroplasmon through several mitotic cycles. Mol. Gen. Genet. 190: 468–474. 10.1007/BF00331078 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Jackson, R. C. 1956. The hybrid origin of Helianthus doronicoides. J. N. Engl. Bot. Club. 58: 97–100. Google Scholar Jackson, R. C. 1963. Cytotaxonomy of Helianthus ciliaris and related species of the south-western U.S. and Mexico. Brittonia. 15: 260–271. Google Scholar Jackson, R. C. 1988. A quantitative cytogenetic analysis of an intersectional hybrid in Helianthus (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 75: 609–614. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb13484.x Google Scholar Jackson, R. C and A. T. Guard 1955. Hybridization of perennial sunflowers in Indiana. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 65: 212–217. Google Scholar Jackson, R. C. and A. T. Guard 1957a. Analysis of some natural and artificial interspecific hybrids in Helianthus. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 66: 306–317. Google Scholar Jackson, R. C and A. T. Guard 1957b. Natural and artificial hybridization between Helianthus mollis and H.occidentalis. Am. Midl. Nat. 58: 422–433. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. 1988. Chromosome doubling of wild x cultivated sunflower interspecific hybrids and its direct effect on backcross success. Proc. 12th Int. Sunflower Conf., Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. 25-29 July. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 287–292. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. 1990. In Search of cytoplasmic male-sterility and fertility restoration genes in wild Helianthus species. Proc. Sunflower Res. Workshop, Fargo, ND. 8-9 January. Natl. Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. 3–5. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. 1991. Cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration of two wild Helianthus annuus accession. Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI. 100. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. 1992a. Cytoplasmic-nuclear gene interaction for plant vigor in Helianthus species. Crop Sci. 32: 320–323. 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200020007x Web of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C. 1992b. Inheritance and allelism of mitomycin C- and streptomycin-induced recessive genes for male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci. 32: 317–320. 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200020006x Web of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and J. M. Chandler 1985a. Interspecific hybrids of diploid perennials x cultivated Helianthus annuus L. Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI. 58. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and J. M. Chandler 1985b. Transfer of powdery mildew resistance from Helianthus debilis Nutt.to cultivated sunflower (H. annuus L.). Crop Sci. 25: 664–666. 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500040020x Web of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and J. M. Chandler 1989. Interspecific hybrids and amphiploids of Helianthus annuus x H. bolanderi. Crop Sci. 29: 643–646. 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030019x Web of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C., J. M. Chandler, and S. A. Wagner 1988. Induced tetraploidy and trismonic production of Helianthus annuus. L.Genome. 30: 647–651. 10.1139/g88-109 Web of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and T. J. Gulya 1988. Two new sources of cytoplasmic male sterility from wild H. annuus L. Proc. Sunflower Res. Workshop, Fargo, ND. 25 Jan. National Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. 7. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and J.N Rutger 1988. Mitomycin C- and streptomycin-induced male sterility in cultivat- ed sunflower. Crop Sci. 28: 792–795. 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800050014x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and T. X. Zhang 1994. Fertility restoration of a cytoplasmic male-sterile plant identified in a Helianthus maximiliani Schrad. population. Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI. 129. Google Scholar Jan, C. C. and T. X. Zhang 1995. Interspecific gene transfer from tetraploid Helianthus hirsutus into cultivated sunflower. Proc. Sunflower Res. Workshop, Fargo, ND. 12-13 Jan. Natl. Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. 48–49. Google Scholar Jan, C. C, T. X. Zhang, J. F. Miller, and G. N. Fick 1994. Fertility restoration and utilization of a male-sterile H. rigidus cytoplasm. Proc. Sunflower Res. Workshop, Fargo, ND. 13-14 Jan. 1995. Natl. Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. 70–71. Google Scholar Khush, G. S., R. J. Singh, S. C. Sur, and A. L. Librojo 1984. Primary trisomics of rice: Origin, mor- phology, cytology and use in linkage mapping. Genetics. 107: 141–163. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kinman, M. L. 1970. New developments in the USDA and state experiment station sunflower breed- ing programs. Proc. 4th Int. Sunflower Conf., Memphis, TN. 23-25 June. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 181–183. Google Scholar Klasterska, I. and A. T. Natarajan 1974. The role of the diffuse stage in the cytological problems of meiosis in Rosa. Hereditas. 76: 109–116. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1974.tb01182.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kostoff, D. 1939. Autosyndesis and structural hybridity in F1 hybrid Helianthus tuberosus L.x H. annuus L. and their sequences. Genetica. 21: 285–300. 10.1007/BF01508121 Google Scholar Kovacik, A. and R. Kryzanek 1969. Biological and biochemical analysis of sterile and fertile pollen of sunflower. Genet. Slechteni. 5: 179–184. Google Scholar Kräuter, R., A. Steimetz, and W. Friedt 1991. Efficient interspecific hybridization in the genus Helianthus via "embryo rescue" and characterization of the hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 521–525. 10.1007/BF00588609 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kulshreshtha, V. B. and P. K. Gupta 1981. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Helianthus L.II. Karyological studies in twelve species. Cytologia. 46: 279–289. Google Scholar Kural, A. and J. F. Miller 1992. The inheritance of male fertility restoration of the PET2, GIG1, and MAX1 sunflower cytoplasmic male sterility sources. Proc. 13th Int. Sunflower Conf., Pisa, Italy. 7-11 September. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 1107–1112. Google Scholar Kurnik, E., J. Parragh, and B. Pozsar 1971. Effect of y-ray dose (66Co) on the size and stainability of root chromosomes of sunflower. (In Hungarian.) Bot. Kozl. 58: 235–237. Google Scholar Leclercq, P. 1966. Une stérilité male utilisable pour la production d'hybrids simples de tournesol. Ann. Amelior. Plant. 16: 135–144. Google Scholar Leclercq, P. 1969. Une sterilite cytoplasmique chez le tournesol. Ann. Amelior. Plant. 19: 99–106. Web of Science®Google Scholar Leclercq, P. 1983. Etude de divers cas de sterilite male cytoplasmique chez le tournesol. Agronomie. 3: 185–187. Google Scholar Leclercq, P., Y. Cauderon, and M. Dauge 1970. Selection pour la resistance au mildiour du tournesol a partir d'hybrides topinambour x tournesol. Ann. Amelior. Plant. 20: 363–373. Web of Science®Google Scholar Leroy, P., S. Bazetoux, F. Quétier, J. Delbut, and A. Bervillé 1985. A comparison between mito- chondrial DNA of an isogenic male-sterile (S) and male-fertile (F) couple (HA 89) of sun- flower. Curr. Genet. 9: 245–251. 10.1007/BF00420319 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Levan, A., K. Fregda, and L. Sandberg 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromo- somes. Hereditas. 52: 201–220. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Lewis, K. R. and B. John 1966. The meiotic consequences of spontaneous chromosome breakage. Chromosoma. 18: 287–304. 10.1007/BF00326873 Web of Science®Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1955a. Hybridization between the perennial sunflowers Helianthus salicifolius A.Dietr. and H. grosseserratus Martens. Am. Midl. Nat. 54: 61–64. 10.2307/2422177 Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1955b. Hybridization in perennial sunflowers. Am. J. Bot. 42: 769–777. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1955.tb10421.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1957. A cytological analysis of a naturally occurring Helianthus hybrid. Ohio J. Sci. 57: 63–69. Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1959. Natural and artificial hybrids of Helianthus maximiliani x H.grosseserratus. Am. J. Bot. 46: 687–692. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1959.tb07071.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1960. Biosystematics of two perennial species of Helianthus (Compositae).I. Crossing relationships and transplant studies. Am. J. Bot. 47: 729–735. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1960.tb07158.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1961. Biosystematics of two perennial species of Helianthus (Compositae).II. Natural populations and taxonomy. Brittonia. 13: 129–141. 10.2307/2805349 Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1963. Cytogenetic investigations of artificial Helianthus giganteus x H.salicifolius hybrids (Compositae). Ohio J. Sci. 63: 273–281. Google Scholar Long, R. W. 1966. Biosystematics of the Helianthus nuttallii complex (Compositae). Brittonia. 18: 64–79. 10.2307/2805111 Web of Science®Google Scholar Miller, J. F. 1992. Update on inheritance of sunflower characteristics. Proc. 13th Int. Sunflower Conf., Pisa, Italy. 7-11 September. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 905–945. Google Scholar Miller, J.F. and G.N. Fick 1997. The genetics of sunflower. p. 441–495. In A.A. Schneiter (ed.) Sunflower technology and production. Agron. Monogr. 35. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. 10.2134/agronmonogr35.c9 Google Scholar Moens, P. B. 1964. A new interpretation of meiotic prophase in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Chromosoma. 15: 231–242. 10.1007/BF00321508 Web of Science®Google Scholar Monéger, F., C. J. Smart, and C. J. Leaver 1994. Nuclear restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower is associated with the tissue-specific regulation of a noval mitochondrial gene. EMBO J. 13: 8–17. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06230.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Murashige, T. and F. Skoog 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tis- sue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Nagl, W. and I. Capesius 1976. Molecular and cytological characteristics of nuclear DNA and chro- matin for Angiosperm systematics: basic data for Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 126: 221–237. 10.1007/BF00981672 Web of Science®Google Scholar Nakashima, H. and S. Hosokawa 1974. Studies on histological features of male sterility in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 43: 475–481. Google Scholar Newcomb, W. 1973a. The development of the embryo sac of sunflower Helianthus annuus before fer- tilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 863–878. 10.1139/b73-109 Web of Science®Google Scholar Newcomb, W. 1973b. The development of the embryo sac of sunflower Helianthus annuus after fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 879–890. 10.1139/b73-110 Web of Science®Google Scholar Paun, L. 1974. The cytologic mechanism of male sterility in sunflower. p. 249–257. In A. V. Vranceanu (ed.) Proc. 6th Int. Sunflower Conf., Bucharest, Romania. 22-24 July. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. Google Scholar Piquemal, G. 1970. How to produce hybrid sunflower seeds by inducing male sterility with gibberellic acid. Proc 4th Int. Sunflower Conf., Memphis, TN. 23-25 June. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 127–135. Google Scholar Pirev, M. N. 1966. A histochemical study of microsporogenesis in pollen-fertile and pollen-sterile forms of sunflower. Bull. Acad. Sci. Moldav. SSR. 11: 91–94.(In Russian.) Google Scholar Pirev, M. N. 1968. A study of the male reproductive organs of sunflower with normal and sterilePollen. Bull. Acad. Sci. Moldav. SSR. 14: 62–71.(In Russian.) Google Scholar Pogorietsky, B. K. and V. F. Kukinn 1971. New sources of male sterility in the sunflower.(In Ukrainian.) Visnik Silskogospod. Nauki. 1: 39–42. Google Scholar Pustovoit, G.V 1969. Breeding sunflower for group immunity by the method of interspecific hybridization. Agric. Biol. 4: 803–812.(In Russian.) Google Scholar Quresh, Z. and C. C. Jan 1993. Allelic relationships among genes for resistance to sunflower rust. Crop Sci. 33: 235–238. 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300020003x Google Scholar Quresh, Z., C. C. Jan, and T. J. Gulya 1993. Resistance to sunflower rust and its inheritance in wild sunflower species. Plant Breed. 110: 297–306. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00593.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Raicu, P., V. Vranceanu, A. Mihailescu, C. Popescu, and M. Kirillova 1976. Research of the chromosome complement in Helianthus L.genus. Caryologia. 29: 307–316. Google Scholar Rhoades, M. M. and B. McClintock 1935. The cytogenetics of maize. Bot. Rev. 1: 292–325. 10.1007/BF02869757 Google Scholar Rick, C. M. and D. W. Barton 1954. Cytological and genetical identification of the primary trisomics of the tomato. Genetics. 39: 640–666. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Rick, C. M., W. H. Dempsey, and G. S. Khush 1964. Further studies on the primary trisomics of the tomato. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 6: 93–108. 10.1139/g64-012 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar Rogers, C. E., T. E. Thompson, and G. J. Seiler 1982. Sunflower species of the United States. Natl. Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. Google Scholar Schilling, E. E. and C. B. Heiser 1981. Infrageneric classification of Helianthus (Compositae). Taxon. 30: 393–403. 10.2307/1220139 Web of Science®Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. 1991a. Registration of six interspecific sunflower germplasm lines derived form wild perennial species. Crop Sci. 31: 1097–1098. 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100040074x Web of Science®Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. 1991b. Registration of 15 interspecific sunflower germplasm lines derived from wild annual species. Crop Sci. 31: 1389–1390. 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050081x Web of Science®Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. 1991c. Registration of 13 downy mildew tolerant interspecific sunflower germplasm lines derived from wild annual species. Crop Sci. 31: 1714–1716. 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100060093x Web of Science®Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. 1992. Utilization of wild sunflower species for the improvement of cultivated sunflower. Field Crops Res. 30: 195–230. 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90002-Q Web of Science®Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. 1993. Registration of six interspecific germplasm lines derived from wild perennial sunflower. Crop Sci. 33: 1110–1111. 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300050057x Google Scholar Seiler, G.J. 1997. Anatomy and morphology of sunflower. p. 67–111. In A.A. Schneiter (ed.) Sunflower technology and production. Agron. Monogr. 35. ASA, CSS A, and SSSA, Madison, WI. Google Scholar Seiler, G. J. and C. C. Jan 1994. New fertility restoration genes from wild sunflower for sunflower PET1 male-sterile cytoplasm. Crop Sci. 34: 1526–1528. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060021x Web of Science®Google Scholar Serieys, H. 1984. Wild Helianthus species, a potential source of androsterilities. Proc. Eucarpia Meet. Sunflower, Leningrad, USSR. 16-21 April. Agric. Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 1–14. Google Scholar Serieys, H. 1987. FAO sunflower sub-network report 1984-1986. p. 1–23. In D. Skoric (ed.) Genetic evaluation and use of Helianthus wild species and their use in breeding programs. FAO, Rome, Italy. Google Scholar Serieys, H. 1991a. Note on the codification of sunflower CMS sources, FAO sunflower research sub- network. Proc. 1990 FAO Sunflower Subnetwork Progr. Rep., Pisa, Italy. 13-15 May. FAO, Rome. VI-9 - VI–13. Google Scholar Serieys, H. 1991b. Identification, study and utilization in breeding programs of new CMS sources, FAO sunflower research subnetwork. Proc. 1990 FAO Sunflower Subnetwork Progr. Rep., Pisa, Italy. 13-15 May. FAO, Rome. VI-1 - VI–8. Google Scholar Serieys, H. 1994. Report on the past activities of the FAO working group "Identification, study and utilization in breeding programs of new CMS sources," for the period 1991-1993. Helia. 17: 93–102. Google Scholar Serieys, H. and P. Vincourt 1987. Characterization of some new CMS sources from Helianthus genus. Helia. 10: 9–13. Google Scholar Siculella, L. and J. D. Palmer 1988. Physical and gene organization of mitochondrial DNA in fertile and male sterile sunflower.CMS-associated alterations in structure and transcription of the atpA gene. Nucl. Acids Res. 16: 3787–3799. 10.1093/nar/16.9.3787 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sims, L. E. and H. J. Price 1985. Nuclear DNA content variation in Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 72: 1213–1219. 10.2307/2443401 Web of Science®Google Scholar Singh, R. J. and T. Tsuchiya 1981a. Cytological study of the telocentric chromosome in seven monotelotrisomics of barley. Bot. Gaz. 142: 267–273. Google Scholar Singh, R. J. and T. Tsuchiya 1981b. Identification and designation of barley chromosomes by Giemsa banding technique: A reconsideration. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 86: 336–340. Google Scholar Singh, R. J. and T. Tsuchiya 1982a. Identification and designation of telocentric chromosomes in barley by means of Giemsa N-banding technique. Theor. Appl. Genet. 64: 13–24. 10.1007/BF00303644 Google Scholar Singh, R. J. and T. Tsuchiya 1982b. An improved Giemsa N-banding technique for the identification of barley chromosomes. J. Hered. 73: 227–229. Web of Science®Google Scholar Skoric, D., J. Atlagic, R. Marinkovic, L. Vasiljevic, M. Mihaljcevic, and S. Masirevic 1987. Genetic evaluation of Helianthus wild species and their use in breeding programs, FAO sunflower research subnetwork. Proc. 1984-1986 FAO Sunflower Subnetwork Progr. Rep., Szeged, Hungary. 28-30 July. FAO, Rome. 1–35. Google Scholar Skoric, D., R. Marinkovic, and J. Atlagic 1988. Determination of restorer genes for sources of cyto- plasmic male sterility in wild sunflower species. Proc. 12th Int. Sunflower Conf., Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. 25-29 July. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 282–286. Google Scholar Smith, D. M. 1957. A new species of Helianthus from North Carolina and Tennessee. Brittonia. 10: 192–194. Google Scholar Smith, D. M. 1961. Variation in the tetraploid sunflowers, Helianthus decapetalus, H.hirsutus and H. strumosus. Recent Adv. Bot. 1: 878–881. Google Scholar Smith, D. M. and A. T. Guard 1958. Hybridization between Helianthus divaricatus and H.micro- cephalus. Brittonia. 10: 137–145. 10.2307/2804794 Google Scholar Smith, D. M. and W. C. Martin 1959. Natural hybridization of Helianthus longifolius with H.atrorubens and H. occidentalis. Rhodora. 61: 140–147. Google Scholar Szabö, M., S. Gulyás, and J. Frank 1984. Comparative anatomy of the androecium of male sterile and fertile sunflowers (Helianthus). Acta Bot. Hungar. 30: 67–73. Google Scholar Tan, A. S., C. C. Jan, and T. J. Gulya 1992. Inheritance of resistance to race 4 of sunflower downy mildew in wild sunflower accessions. Crop Sci. 32: 949–952. 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200040022x Web of Science®Google Scholar Tatum, L. A. 1971. The southern corn leaf blight epidemic. Science (Washington, DC). 171: 1113–1116. 10.1126/science.171.3976.1113 CASADSPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Thompson, T. E., D. C. Zimmerman, and C. E. Rogers 1981. Wild Helianthus as a genetic resource. Field Crops Res. 4: 333–343. 10.1016/0378-4290(81)90083-6 Web of Science®Google Scholar Tsvetkova, F. 1974. A study of hybridization between Helianthus scaberrimus and H. annuus. Abstr. Bulgar. Sci. Lit. A19: 623.(Abstract) Google Scholar Vigfusson, E. 1970. On polyspermy in the sunflower. Hereditas. 64: 1–52. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1970.tb02272.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Vinitskaya, O. P. 1973. Breeding sunflowers for group immunity by interspecific hybridization. Mikol. Fitopatol. 7: 76–77. Google Scholar Vranceanu, V. 1970. Advances in sunflower breeding in Romania. Proc. 4th Int. Sunflower Conf., Memphis, TN. 23-25 June. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Paris, France. 136–148. Google Scholar Vranceanu, A.V and M. Iuoras 1988. Hibridul interspecific dintre Helianthus rigidus Desf.si floarea-soarelui cultivata (H. annuus L.). Probl. Genet. Teor. Aplic. 2: 109–119. Google Scholar Vranceanu, A.V, M. Iuoras, and F. M. Stoenescu 1986. A contribution to the diversification of the CMS sources in sunflower. Helia. 9: 21–25. Google Scholar Vranceanu, V. and F. Stoenescu 1970. Imunitate la mana florii-soarelui, conditionata manogenic. Probl. Agric. 2: 34–40. Google Scholar Vulpe, V. 1972. Surce de androsterilitete le floara soarelni. Anal. I.C.C.P.T. 38: 273–277. Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1974. Discontinuities in the callose wall, intermeiocyte connections, and cytomixis in angiosperm meiocytes. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1219–1224. 10.1139/b74-157 Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1976. Sterility problems in interspecific hybridization of Helianthus species. Proc. Sunflower Research Workshop, Bismarck, ND. 12-13 January. Natl. Sunflower Assoc, Bismarck, ND. 5–6. Google Scholar Whelan, E.D.P. 1978. Cytology and interspecific hybridization. p. 339–370. In J.F. Cater (ed.) Sunflower science and technology. Agron. Monogr. 19. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1978. Hybridization between annual and perennial diploid species of Helianthus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 20: 523–530. Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1979. Interspecific hybrids between Helianthus petiolaris Nutt.and H. annuus L.: Effect of back-crossing on meiosis. Euphytica. 28: 297–308. 10.1007/BF00056586 Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1980. A new source of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower. Euphytica. 29: 33–46. 10.1007/BF00037247 Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1981. Cytoplasmic male sterility in Helianthus giganteus L.X H. annuus L. inter-specific hybrids. Crop Sci. 21: 855–858. 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060014x Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. 1982. Trisomic progeny from interspecific hybrids between Helianthus maximiliani and H.annuus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24: 375–384. Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. and W. Dedio 1980. Registration of sunflower germplasm composite crosses CMG- 1, CMG-2, and CMG-3. Crop Sci. 20: 832. 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060066x Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. and D. G. Dorrell 1980. Interspecific hybrids between Helianthus maximiliani Schrad.and H. annuus L.: Effect of backcrossing on meiosis, anther morphology, and seed characteristics. Crop Sci. 20: 29–34. 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000010008x Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P., G. H. Haggis, E. J. Ford, and B. Dronzek 1974. Scanning electron microscopy of meiotic chromosomes of plants in situ. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1438–1440. 10.1139/b74-188 Web of Science®Google Scholar Whelan, E. D. P. and C. A. Hornby 1969. Meiotic prophase in Prunus avium cultivar Lambert. Can. J. Bot. 47: 1813–1815. 10.1139/b69-261 Web of Science®Google Scholar Zeller, F. J., G. Kimber, and B. S. Gill 1977. The identification of rye trisomics by translocations and Giemsa staining. Chromosoma (Berlin). 62: 279–289. 10.1007/BF00286049 Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Sunflower Technology and Production, Volume 35 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)