Improving outcomes: case-matched comparison of novel second-generation versus first-generation self-expandable transcatheter heart valves
2016; Oxford University Press; Volume: 50; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/ejcts/ezw021
ISSN1873-734X
AutoresAndreas Schaefer, Hendrik Treede, Gerhard Schoen, Florian Deuschl, Niklas Schofer, Y. Schneeberger, Stefan Blankenberg, Hermann Reichenspurner, Ulrich Schäefer, Lenard Conradi,
Tópico(s)Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
ResumoThe published literature has extensively documented clinical benefit derived from transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients using self-expanding current-generation transfemoral (TF) transcatheter heart valves (THVs). However, it has also demonstrated apparent shortcomings such as paravalvular leakage (PVL) or need for permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation. We here present a case-matched analysis of acute 30-day outcomes using a novel nitinol-based THV (Symetis Acurate Neo TF™), which may overcome some limitations of currently used devices.From 2012 to 2015, 69 consecutive patients (study group, 65.2% female, 81.4 ± 6.1 years, logEuroSCORE I 19.9 ± 14.2%) received TF-TAVI using the novel Symetis Acurate Neo TF™ THV. A control group of patients after TF-TAVI with the CoreValve™ THV was retrieved from our database (control group) and matched to the study group utilizing 16 parameters. Data were retrospectively analysed according to updated Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) definitions. The 30-day follow-up was completed in all cases.Apart from gender (65.2 vs 44.9% females, P = 0.023), matching was successful with parameters showing no significant differences. The device success rate was 95.6% (66/69) and 89.9% (62/69) in the study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.20). The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 5.8% (4/69) vs 10.14% (7/69) (P = 0.36), and disabling stroke was observed in 2.9% (2/69) vs 5.8% (4/69) (P = 0.41), respectively. Resultant transvalvular maximum/mean gradient and effective orifice area (EOA) were 13.8 ± 5.5 vs 18.1 ± 8.1 mmHg (P = 0.001)/7.0 ± 2.8 vs 8.8 ± 4.0 mmHg (P = 0.006) and 1.9 ± 0.3 vs 1.8 ± 0.2 cm(2) (P = 0.015), respectively. PVL ≥grade II was observed in 2.9% (2/69) and 15.94% (11/69) (P = 0.013) of patients and the rate of PM implantation was 8.7% (6/69) vs 44.9% (31/69) (P < 0.001), respectively.TF-TAVI was feasible and safe using this new type of nitinol-based THV. Superiority to the current generation of self-expanding THVs was achieved regarding post-interventional pressure gradients and EOA, severity of residual PVL and rate of PM implantation. Results set a promising quality standard for TF-TAVI with a self-expanding THV, but will have to be confirmed in a larger patient cohorts for further clinical evaluation.
Referência(s)