Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Maxillary Sinus Grafting with Autograft Versus Fresh-Frozen Allograft: A Split-Mouth Evaluation of Bone Volume Dynamics

2015; Quintessence Publishing Company; Volume: 30; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.11607/jomi.3924

1942-4434

Samuel Porfírio Xavier, Erick Ricardo Silva, Adrian Kahn, Liat Chaushu, Gavriel Chaushu,

Cleft Lip and Palate Research

To compare volumetric changes after sinus augmentation of completely edentulous maxillae with either autogenous or allogeneic fresh-frozen bone particles.This split-mouth study in patients who required bilateral sinus grafting used autograft particles for one sinus and allograft particles for the contralateral sinus. The grafted sinuses were left to heal for 6 months prior to implant insertion. All patients underwent four computed tomography scans: prior to augmentation and 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months after grafting. Computer software was used to analyze bone graft volume in each scan.Fifteen patients (8 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 54 ± 5 years (range, 48 to 60 years) took part and underwent 30 sinus augmentation procedures. Mean autograft and allograft volumes were not statistically significantly different at each time point (1 week: 2.01 ± 0.43 cm³ vs 2.46 ± 0.79 cm³; 6 months: 1.53 ± 0.49 cm³ vs 1.75 ± 0.64 cm³; and 12 months: 1.38 ± 0.43 cm³ vs 1.59 ± 0.56 cm³, respectively). Mean volumetric reductions of 31.35% and 35.36% (23.9% and 29.9% in the 6 months prior to implant insertion, followed by an additional 9% and 9% in the following 6 months), relative to 1 week postgrafting, were noted for the autograft and allograft groups, respectively, after 12 months.On the basis of this split-mouth study of 15 patients, there was no statistically significant volumetric difference after 12 months between the use of autograft or allografts for sinus augmentation. Fresh-frozen bone allograft may serve as an alternative that avoids the morbidity associated with autograft harvesting.