Vesicoureteral Reflux and Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Why Cohorts and Methodologies Matter
2016; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 196; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.037
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresSaul P. Greenfield, Earl Y. Cheng, William DeFoor, Bradley P. Kropp, H. Gil Rushton, Steve Skoog, Myra A. Carpenter,
Tópico(s)Urinary Tract Infections Management
ResumoNo AccessJournal of UrologyPediatric Urology1 Oct 2016Vesicoureteral Reflux and Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Why Cohorts and Methodologies Matter Saul P. Greenfield, Earl Cheng, William DeFoor, Bradley Kropp, H. Gil Rushton, Steve Skoog, and Myra Carpenter Saul P. GreenfieldSaul P. Greenfield More articles by this author , Earl ChengEarl Cheng More articles by this author , William DeFoorWilliam DeFoor More articles by this author , Bradley KroppBradley Kropp More articles by this author , H. Gil RushtonH. Gil Rushton More articles by this author , Steve SkoogSteve Skoog More articles by this author , and Myra CarpenterMyra Carpenter More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.037AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Published cohorts of children with vesicoureteral reflux placed on antibiotic prophylaxis differ in baseline characteristics and methodology. These data have been combined in meta-analyses to derive treatment recommendations. We analyzed these cohorts in an attempt to understand the disparate outcomes reported. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 studies were identified from 1987 to 2013. These series retrospectively or prospectively evaluated children with vesicoureteral reflux who were on long-term antibiotic prophylaxis. Presenting demographic data, criteria and methods of evaluation were tabulated. Outcomes were compared, specifically recurrent urinary infections and renal scarring. Results: Significant differences identified in baseline characteristics included gender, circumcision status and reflux grade, and differences in methodology included evaluation of bowel and bladder dysfunction, method of urine collection, definition of urinary infection, measurement of compliance and means of identifying renal scarring. Cohorts with larger numbers of uncircumcised boys had more breakthrough urinary infections. Infection and renal scarring rates were higher in series with higher grades of reflux. Bagged urine specimens were allowed in 6 series, rendering the data suspect. Children with bowel and bladder dysfunction were excluded from 3 cohorts, and bowel and bladder dysfunction was correlated with outcome in only 1 cohort. Compliance was monitored in only 6 studies. Conclusions: Subpopulations and methodologies vary significantly in published series of children with vesicoureteral reflux on antibiotic prophylaxis. It is inappropriate to combine outcomes data from these series in a meta-analysis, which would serve to blur distinctions between these subpopulations. Broad recommendations or guidelines based on meta-analyses should be viewed with caution. References 1 : clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics2011; 128: 595. Google Scholar 2 : Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J Urol2010; 184: 1134. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of febrile urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing dilated to nondilated vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol2015; 193: 1772. Link, Google Scholar 4 : A nonsurgical approach to the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol1987; 138: 941. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Urinary tract infections in children. Part III—treatment of ureterovesical reflux. West J Med1974; 121: 382. Google Scholar 6 : Antibiotic prophylaxis by low dose cefaclor in children with vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol2003; 18: 468. Google Scholar 7 : Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics2006; 117: 626. Google Scholar 8 : Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux: results from a prospective randomized study. J Urol2008; 179: 674. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reflux. N Engl J Med2014; 370: 2367. Google Scholar 10 : Five-year study of medical or surgical treatment in children with severe vesico-ureteral reflux dimercaptosuccinic acid findings. International Reflux Study Group in Europe. Eur J Pediatr1998; 157: 753. Google Scholar 11 : Medical versus surgical treatment in children with severe bilateral vesicoureteral reflux and bilateral nephropathy: a randomised trial. Lancet2001; 357: 1329. Google Scholar 12 : Followup of conservatively treated children with high and low grade vesicoureteral reflux: a prospective study. J Urol1992; 148: 1688. Link, Google Scholar 13 : The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: III. Urinary tract infection pattern. J Urol2010; 184: 286. Link, Google Scholar 14 : The Swedish Reflux Trial: review of a randomized, controlled trial in children with dilating vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol2011; 7: 594. Google Scholar 15 : Experience with vesicoureteral reflux in children: clinical characteristics. J Urol1997; 158: 574. Link, Google Scholar 16 : Treatment of vesicoureteric reflux. Results of a prospective study. Br J Urol1993; 71: 346. Google Scholar 17 : Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children. N Engl J Med2009; 361: 1748. Google Scholar 18 : Is antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux effective in preventing pyelonephritis and renal scars? A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics2008; 121: e1489. Google Scholar 19 : Prophylaxis after first febrile urinary tract infection in children? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Pediatrics2008; 122: 1064. Google Scholar 20 : Results of a randomized clinical trial of medical versus surgical management of infants and children with grades III and IV primary vesicoureteral reflux (United States). The International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol1992; 148: 1667. Abstract, Google Scholar 21 : Characteristics at entry of children with severe primary vesicoureteral reflux recruited for a multicenter, international therapeutic trial comparing medical and surgical management. The International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol1992; 148: 1644. Abstract, Google Scholar 22 : Renal scars and parenchymal thinning in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a 5-year report of the International Reflux Study in Children (European branch). J Urol1992; 148: 1653. Link, Google Scholar 23 : Five-year study of medical or surgical treatment in children with severe reflux: radiological renal findings. The International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Nephrol1992; 6: 223. Google Scholar 24 A prospective trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of severe vesico-ureteric reflux: 2 years’ observation in 96 children. Contrib Nephrol1984; 39: 169. Google Scholar 25 Prospective trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of severe vesicoureteric reflux in children: five years’ observation. Birmingham Reflux Study Group. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987; 295: 237. Google Scholar 26 World Health Organization: Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. Available at http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/malecircumcision/globaltrends/en/. Accessed May 8, 2016. Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGreenfield S (2017) Evidence-Based versus Personalized Medicine in Pediatric UrologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 4, (980-981), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017.Gaither T and Copp H (2016) Vesicoureteral Reflux: How to Interpret Different Studies with Different ResultsJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 4, (981-982), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.Cain M (2016) This Month in Pediatric UrologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 4, (975-976), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016. Volume 196Issue 4October 2016Page: 1238-1243Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsantibiotic prophylaxisvesico-ureteral refluxcohort studiesMetricsAuthor Information Saul P. Greenfield More articles by this author Earl Cheng More articles by this author William DeFoor More articles by this author Bradley Kropp More articles by this author H. Gil Rushton More articles by this author Steve Skoog More articles by this author Myra Carpenter More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)