The Role of the Supertechnologist
2000; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 215; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn49630
ISSN1527-1315
Autores Tópico(s)Radiology practices and education
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 215, No. 3 PreviousNext PerspectivesThe Role of the SupertechnologistRichard M. FriedenbergRichard M. FriedenbergAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange. Received February 16, 2000; accepted March 13. Address correspondence to the author, 18961 Castlegate Ln, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (e-mail: [email protected]).Richard M. FriedenbergPublished Online:Jun 1 2000https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn49630MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References 1 Ashworth TG. The future for histopathology: protectionism or prudence?. BMJ 1994; 309(suppl):417. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Loughran CF, Alltree J, Raynor RB, et al. Skill mix changes in departments of radiology: impact on radiologists workload—reports of a scientific session. Br J Radiol 1996; 69(suppl):129. Google Scholar3 Loughran CF. Report of accident radiographs by radiographers. RAD Magazine July 1996; 34(suppl):. Google Scholar4 Loughran CF. The clinical radiographer [diploma thesis] Keele, England: University of Keele, 1992. Google Scholar5 Robinson PJA, Culpan G, Wiggins M. Interpretation of selected accident and emergency radiographic examinations by radiographers: a review of 11,000 cases. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:546-551. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Larkin G. Occupational monopoly and modern medicine London, England: Tavistock, 1983. Google Scholar7 Swinburne K. Pattern recognition for radiographers. Lancet 1971; 1:589-590. Medline, Google Scholar8 Hillman BJ, Fajardo LJ, Hunter TB, et al. Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:907-911. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Tonita JM, Hillis JP, Lim CH. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Radiology 1999; 211:529-533. Link, Google Scholar10 Bassett LW, Hollatz-Brown AJ, Roshan B, Pearce JG, Hirji K, Chen L. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms. Radiology 1995; 194:189-192. Link, Google Scholar11 Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:10-14. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Loughran CF. Reporting of fracture radiographs by radiographers: the impact of a training programme. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:945-950. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Crawley MT, Shine B, Booth A. Radiation dose and diagnosticity of barium enema examinations by radiographers and radiologists: a comparative study. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:399-405. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Schreiber MH, vanSonnenberg E, Wittich GR. Technical adequacy of fluoroscopic spot films of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison of residents and technologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:795-797. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Mannion RAJ, Bewell J, Langan C, Chapman AH. A barium enema training programme for radiographers: a pilot study. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:715-718. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Bates JA, Conlon RM, Irving HC. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:617-620. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 The College of Radiographers. Reporting by radiographers: a vision paper London, England: College of Radiographers, 1997. Google Scholar18 Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Advice on delegation of tasks in department of clinical radiology London, England: The Royal College of Radiologists, 1996. Google Scholar19 Friedenberg RM. The future of medicine and radiology: part I. Radiology 1999; 212:301-304. Link, Google Scholar20 Friedenberg RM. The next medical revolution should be quality. Radiology 1997; 204(1):31A-34A. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: June 2000 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByFeasibility of an Audit System for Canadian Sonographers in Generalist UltrasoundRobert SeanDima, CalinVasile, Vinicius TieppoFrancio2018 | Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Vol. 34, No. 2Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologistsGabrielaTorres-Mejía, Robert A.Smith, María de la LuzCarranza-Flores, AndyBogart, LouisMartínez-Matsushita, Diana L.Miglioretti, KarlaKerlikowske, CarolinaOrtega-Olvera, ErnestoMontemayor-Varela, AngélicaAngeles-Llerenas, SergioBautista-Arredondo, GilbertoSánchez-González, Olga G.Martínez-Montañez, Santos R.Uscanga-Sánchez, EduardoLazcano-Ponce, MauricioHernández-Ávila2015 | BMC Cancer, Vol. 15, No. 1Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammographyRTanaka, MTakamori, YUchiyama, R MNishikawa, JShiraishi2015 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 88, No. 1047Needs of Research for Technologist-Assisted Diagnosis (TAD)KunioDoi2014 | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, Vol. 70, No. 1The number of Japanese radiologic technologists will be increased in 40 yearsMiwaAraseki, YukiYokooka, TomokiIshikawa, KatsuhikoOgasawara2013 | Radiological Physics and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2Comparison of sensitivity of lung nodule detection between radiologists and technologists on low-dose CT lung cancer screening imagesRKakinuma, KAshizawa, TKobayashi, AFukushima, HHayashi, TKondo, MMachida, MMatsusako, KMinami, KOikado, MOkuda, STakamatsu, MSugawara, SGomi, YMuramatsu, KHanai, YMuramatsu, MKaneko, RTsuchiya, NMoriyama2012 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 85, No. 1017Comparing the accuracy of initial head CT reporting by radiologists, radiology trainees, neuroradiographers and emergency doctorsF AGallagher, K YTay, S LVowler, HSzutowicz, J JCross, D JMcAuley, N MAntoun2011 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 84, No. 1007Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient populationF. J. H. M.Van Den Biggelaar, A. G. H.Kessels, J. M. A.Van Engelshoven, K.Flobbe2010 | International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 64, No. 4Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: A systematic reviewF.J.H.M.van den Biggelaar, P.J.Nelemans, K.Flobbe2008 | The Breast, Vol. 17, No. 1The current status of radiographers as screen readers in breast screening units: applications for AustraliaWMThompson, KPollard2 October 2013 | Radiographer, Vol. 54, No. 3Comentarios al editorial aparecido en el número 3 de la revistaÁ.Morales Santos2007 | Radiología, Vol. 49, No. 6The Role of Certified Radiological Technicians in Computed Tomography Screening for Lung CancerKouzouHanai, RyutarouKakinuma, KenjiEguchi, ToruMatsumoto, KeiichiNagao, MasahiroKaneko, YoshihisaMuramatsu, IsaoYamaguchi, YoshimasaNakamura, YukihiroTsuda, YoshihiroHagiwara, KumikoMatsumoto, YukoNagano, ShihoGomi, NoriyukiMoriyama, RyosukeTsuchiya2007 | Haigan, Vol. 47, No. 6An Assessment of the Potential for Interpretation of CT Images by Radiological TechnologistsTORUMATSUMOTO2005 | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, Vol. 61, No. 6MRI diagnosis of fracture of the scaphoid boneJakob MMoller, LoneLarsen, JanBovin, Gunnar SLausten, MariaHasselqvist, Claus MunkJensen, IanRopke, Henrik SThomsen2004 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 7Reimbursement risks with radiologist extenders: there is no free lunch!William TThorwarth2004 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 1, No. 6A Report of the Special Committee for the Future Planning on the JSRT : Future Vision of the JSRT with the Asvanced Education System Related to Radiological Technology2003 | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, Vol. 59, No. 1Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 215, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)