Functional Capacity Evaluation
2002; Slack Incorporated (United States); Volume: 25; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês
10.3928/0147-7447-20021001-25
ISSN1938-2367
Autores Tópico(s)Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
ResumoREVIEWFunctional Capacity Evaluation Vert Mooney, MD, , MD Vert Mooney, MD Orthopedics, 2013;25(10):1094–1099Published Online:October 01, 2002https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20021001-25Cited by:7PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMore1. Social Security Administration. Plans For A New Disability Claims Process. Washington, DC: Social Security Administration; 1994. Google Scholar2. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Chicago. ?1: American Medical Association; 1993. Google Scholar3. McCarthy ML, McAndrew MP, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Correlation between the measures of impairment, according to the modified system of the American Medical Association, and function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 1 034- 1042. Google Scholar4. Butler RJ, Park YS. Impairment ratings for back claims are poor predictors of wage loss. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2000; 10:153-168. Google Scholar5. de Bruin AF, de Witte LP, Stevens F, Diederiks JP. Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:1003-1014. Google Scholar6. King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998; 78:852-866. Google Scholar7. State of California Department of Industrial Relations. Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities. Sacramento, Calif: Division of Industrial Accidents of die State of California; 1978. Google Scholar8. Matheson L, Mooney V. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Employment Screening and Functional Capacity Evaluation io Determine Safe Return to Work. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Submitted. Google Scholar9. Mooney V, Matheson L. California Functional Capacity Protocol Examiner's Manual. San Diego, Calif: OrthoMed Research Foundation; 1994. Google Scholar10. Mooney V1 Matheson L. Final Report: Objective Measurement of Soft Tissue Injury. San Diego. Calif: OrthoMed Research Foundation; 1994. Google Scholar11 . Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN. Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. Journal of Sports and Physical Therapy Clinical Commentary. 1993; 18:682-686. Google Scholar12. Bigos SJ. Spengler DM, Martin NA, et al. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study, II: injury factors. Spine. 1986; 1 1:246-251. Google Scholar13. Battie MC, Bigos SJ, Fisher LD, Hansson TH, Jones ME, Wortley MD. Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports. Spine. 1989; 14:851-856. Google Scholar14. Fishbain DA, Abdel-Moty E, Cutler R, et al. Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary Of Occupational Titles. Spine. 1994; 19:872-880. Google Scholar1 5. Kisbino ND, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, et at. Quantification of lumbar function, IV: isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low-back dysfunctional patients. Spine. 1985; 10:921-927. Google Scholar16. Snook SH, Irvine CH. Maximum acceptable weight of lift. Am lnd Hvg Assoc J. 1967; 28:322-329. Google Scholar17. Mayer TG, Barnes D, Kishino ND, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation, I: a standardized protocol and normative database. Spine. 1988; 13:993-997. Google Scholar18. Alpert J, Matheson L. Beam W, et al. The reliability and validity of two new tests of maximum lifting capacity. Journal of Occupational Reliabilitation. 1991; 1:13-30. Google Scholar19. Matheson LN, Mooney V, Grant JE, et al. A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults, I: development and reliability testing. Spine. 1995; 20:21 19-2129. Google Scholar20. Matheson L. Relationships among age, body weight, resting heart rate, and performance in a new test of lift capacity. J Occup Rehabil. 1996; 6:225-237. Google Scholar21. Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993; 3:15-30. Google Scholar22. Matheson LN, Kaskutas VK, Mada D. Development and construct validation of the hand function sort. J Occup Rehabil 2001; 1 1:73-86. Google Scholar23. Matheson L, Mooney V, Cajozzo V, et al. Effect of instructions on isokinetic trunk strength variability, reliability, absolute value, and predictive validity. Spine. 1992; 17:914-921. Google Scholar24. Mooney V, Kenney D, Leggett S, Holmes B. Relationship of lumbar strength in shipyard workers to workplace injury claims. Spine. 1996; 21:2001-2005. Google Scholar25. Matheson LN, Mooney V, Grant JE, Leggett S, Kenny K. Standardized evaluation of work capacity. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 1996; 6:249-264. Google Scholar26. US Department of Labor. Dictionary of Occupanonal Titles. Vol I and ?. 4th ed (revised). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1991. Google Scholar27. Evanoff B. Physical Demands Questionnaire. St Louis, Mo: Washington University School of Medicine; 1 993. Google Scholar28. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984; 9:222-226. Google Scholar29. Poitras S, Loisel P, Prince F, Lemaire J. Disability measurement in persons with back pain: a validity study of spinal range of motion and velocity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:13941400. Google Scholar30. Matheson L. Effects of age, gender and body mass on lift capacity. J Occup Rehabil. 1996;6:225-237. Google Scholar31. Hazard RG, Reid S, Fenwick J, Reeves V. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: variability as an indicator of effort. Spine. 1988; 13:54-57. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Bohl D, Ahn J, Collins M, Mayo B, Massel D, Aboushaala K, Kamath R, Duhancioglu G, Elbeik M and Singh K (2016) Functional Capacity Evaluation Following Spinal Fusion Surgery, Spine, 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001457, 41:13, (1104-1110), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Bierner S (2014) Approaches to the Quantitative Physical and Functional Capacity Assessment of Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders Handbook of Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability Disorders in the Workplace, 10.1007/978-1-4939-0612-3_16, (287-300), . Ciccolella M and Davenport T (2013) Scientific and legal challenges to the functional capacity evaluation in chronic fatigue syndrome, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 10.1080/21641846.2013.828960, 1:4, (243-255), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Sluiter J and Frings-Dresen M (2009) Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation Lifting Tests in Construction Workers on Sick Leave as a Result of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.020, 90:2, (302-308), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Sluiter J and Frings-Dresen M (2006) Reliability and Agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation Lifting Tests in Subjects With Low Back Pain, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028, 87:10, (1365-1370), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2006. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Sluiter J and Frings-Dresen M (2005) Intra- and Interrater Reliability of the Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation Method in Adults Without Musculoskeletal Complaints, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.004, 86:12, (2354-2360), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P and Frings-Dresen M (2004) Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7, 77:8, (527-537), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2004. Request Permissions InformationCopyright 2013, SLACK IncorporatedPDF download
Referência(s)