Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Cytological Grading of Prostatic Aspiration Biopsy: A Comparison with the Gleason Grading System

1987; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 138; Issue: 4 Part 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43378-7

1527-3792

Lester J. Layfield, Eliahu Mukamel, Lee H. Hilborne, James Hannah, Ben J. Glasgow, Britt‐Marie Ljung, Jean B. deKernion,

Urologic and reproductive health conditions

No AccessJournal of Urology1 Oct 1987Cytological Grading of Prostatic Aspiration Biopsy: A Comparison with the Gleason Grading System Lester J. Layfield, Eliahu Mukamel, Lee H. Hilborne, James B. Hannah, Ben J. Glasgow, Britt-Marie Ljung, and Jean B. dekernion Lester J. LayfieldLester J. Layfield More articles by this author , Eliahu MukamelEliahu Mukamel More articles by this author , Lee H. HilborneLee H. Hilborne More articles by this author , James B. HannahJames B. Hannah More articles by this author , Ben J. GlasgowBen J. Glasgow Recipient of the American Cancer Society Regular Clinical Fellowship Award 1986-1987. More articles by this author , Britt-Marie LjungBritt-Marie Ljung More articles by this author , and Jean B. dekernionJean B. dekernion More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43378-7AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Cytological grade determined by fine needle aspiration of the prostate was compared to histological grade in 30 patients undergoing subsequent radical prostatectomy. The degree of cytological pleomorphism determined by the consensus grade of 3 observers predicted correctly the Gleason grade sum range in 80 per cent of the cases. The cytological grade was reasonably reproducible with agreement among all 3 observers in 50 per cent of the cases and between 2 of 3 observers in the remainder. The accuracy of predicting the Gleason grade sum of the radical prostatectomy specimen by cytological examination compared favorably with that achieved by histological examination of cutting needle biopsy and transurethral resection specimens reported in the literature. © 1987 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited Byvan der Poel H, Schaafsma H, Vooijs G, Debruyne F and Schalken J (2018) Quantitative Light Microscopy in Urological OncologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 148, NO. 1, (1-13), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1992.Gleason D (2018) Re: The Natural Course of Prostatic Carcinoma in Relation to Initial Cytological Grade, by J. Adolfsson and B. Fahraeus, J. Urol., 140: 1452–1454, 1988Journal of Urology, VOL. 142, NO. 3, (831-831), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1989. Volume 138Issue 4 Part 1October 1987Page: 798-800 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1987 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Lester J. Layfield More articles by this author Eliahu Mukamel More articles by this author Lee H. Hilborne More articles by this author James B. Hannah More articles by this author Ben J. Glasgow Recipient of the American Cancer Society Regular Clinical Fellowship Award 1986-1987. More articles by this author Britt-Marie Ljung More articles by this author Jean B. dekernion More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...