
The Public Recognizes Plastic Surgeons as Leading Experts in the Treatment of Congenital Cleft and Craniofacial Anomalies
2015; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 26; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1097/scs.0000000000002157
ISSN1536-3732
AutoresRafael Denadai, Hugo Samartine, Rodrigo Denadai, Cássio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral,
Tópico(s)Dental Education, Practice, Research
ResumoObjective: The aim of this study is to assess the public perception of plastic surgeons (PS) as craniofacial surgery specialists. Methods: Members of the public (N = 1514) were asked to choose 1 or 2 specialists that they perceived to be an expert for 13 craniofacial surgery-related scenarios. Response patterns were distributed as "plastic surgeon alone" (PS alone), "PS combined with other specialists", or "no plastic surgeon" (No PS). Sociodemographic data, previous plastic surgery contact, and source of reported information were also collected. Results: "Plastic surgeon alone" was significantly (all P < 0.05) more recognized as experts than all other response patterns particularly in congenital anomalies-related scenarios (83.33%). There was a significantly (all P < 0.05) poor understanding of the role of PSs in head/neck infection management, chronic facial palsy management, dental disease management, head and neck cancer surgery, vascular malformation surgery, and facial fracture surgery. Sex, age, education level, health care professional, prior plastic surgery contact, and source of reported information were not significant (all P < 0.05) determinants of "PS" as the response in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Public recognized PSs as experts primarily in treatment of congenital cleft and craniofacial anomalies, but as the overall scope of craniofacial surgery practice was poorly understood and known, improved public education is needed.
Referência(s)