AMS 742 Sphincter: UCLA Experience
1980; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 124; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55680-3
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresR Bruskewitz, Shlomo Raz, Robert B. Smith, Joseph J. Kaufman,
Tópico(s)Urological Disorders and Treatments
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Urology1 Dec 1980AMS 742 Sphincter: UCLA Experience Reg Bruskewitz, Shlomo Raz, Robert B. Smith, and Joseph J. Kaufman Reg BruskewitzReg Bruskewitz Current address: Division of Urology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinic, Madison, Wisconsin 53792. More articles by this author , Shlomo RazShlomo Raz More articles by this author , Robert B. SmithRobert B. Smith More articles by this author , and Joseph J. KaufmanJoseph J. Kaufman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55680-3AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Between December 1977 and November 1978 artificial sphincters were implanted in 2 female and 19 male patients for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Etiologies for incontinence varied, including post-prostatectomy incontinence, myelodysplasia and female incontinence after unsuccessful bladder neck suspension. Over-all, 38 per cent of the patients were excellent or improved postoperatively, while 24 per cent experienced continuing unabated urinary incontinence and 24 per cent experienced urethral erosion at the site of cuff placement. The device was removed in 14 per cent of the patients when it became infected. © 1980 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byKaufman M, Milam D, Johnsen N, Cleves M, Broghammer J, Brant W, Jones L, Brady J, Gross M and Henry G (2017) Prior Radiation Therapy Decreases Time to Idiopathic Erosion of Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Multi-Institutional AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 4, (1037-1041), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.Johnson D, O’reilly J and Warren J (2018) Clinical Evaluation of an External Urine Collection Device for Nonambulatory Incontinent WomenJournal of Urology, VOL. 141, NO. 3 Part 1, (535-537), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1989.Walterspiel J, Kaplan s, Fishman I and Scott F (2018) Fungal Infection Associated with Artificial Urethral Sphincters in ChildrenJournal of Urology, VOL. 135, NO. 6, (1245-1246), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1986.Furlow W and Barrett D (2018) Recurrent or Persistent Urinary Incontinence in Patients with the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Diagnostic Considerations and ManagementJournal of Urology, VOL. 133, NO. 5, (792-795), Online publication date: 1-May-1985.Webster G and Sihelnik S (2018) Troubleshooting the Malfunctioning Scott Artificial Urinary SphincterJournal of Urology, VOL. 131, NO. 2, (269-272), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1984.Barrett D and Furlow W (2018) The Management of Severe Urinary Incontinence in patients with Myelodysplasia by Implantation of the as 791/792 Urinary Sphincter DeviceJournal of Urology, VOL. 128, NO. 3, (484-486), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1982. Volume 124 Issue 6 December 1980 Page: 812-814 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1980 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Reg Bruskewitz Current address: Division of Urology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinic, Madison, Wisconsin 53792. More articles by this author Shlomo Raz More articles by this author Robert B. Smith More articles by this author Joseph J. Kaufman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)