Facilitation of Difficult Percutaneous Ureteral Stent Insertion
1982; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 128; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53408-4
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresMorteza K. Elyaderani, John A. Belis, Stanley J. Kandzari, Orlando F. Gabriele,
Tópico(s)Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Urology1 Dec 1982Facilitation of Difficult Percutaneous Ureteral Stent Insertion Morteza K. Elyaderani, John A. Belis, Stanley J. Kandzari, and Orlando F. Gabriele Morteza K. ElyaderaniMorteza K. Elyaderani More articles by this author , John A. BelisJohn A. Belis More articles by this author , Stanley J. KandzariStanley J. Kandzari More articles by this author , and Orlando F. GabrieleOrlando F. Gabriele More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53408-4AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Attempts to convert percutaneous nephrostomies into internal ureteral stents were done by antegrade techniques in 26 patients in whom a retrograde approach for stent placement previously had been unsuccessful. There appeared to be complete obstruction of the ureter on antegrade urography in 8 patients but the area of the obstruction was traversed and a ureteral stent was inserted. Dilation of malignant or benign ureteral strictures followed by ureteral stent placement was done in 15 patients. The major difficulties in antegrade ureteral stent placement were marked ureteral tortuosity and ureteral kinking. The tortuosity was managed by insertion of a pigtail catheter in these instances. The pigtail catheter was wedged in the region of the kink and passed through the area of difficulty by manipulation of the catheter and guide wire under fluoroscopy. Another problem encountered was coiling and kinking of the catheter in a dilated renal pelvis. This problem was resolved by the transparenchymal approach for percutaneous nephrostomy and application of torque guide wires and stiffer torque control catheters. We herein demonstrate that apparent complete obstruction of the ureter on pyelography does not preclude consideration of ureteral stent insertion and that an antegrade approach often is successful when a ureteral stent cannot be placed by a retrograde technique. © 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 128Issue 6December 1982Page: 1173-1176 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Morteza K. Elyaderani More articles by this author John A. Belis More articles by this author Stanley J. Kandzari More articles by this author Orlando F. Gabriele More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)