Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Efficacy of trastuzumab beyond progression in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational cohort study

2016; Impact Journals LLC; Volume: 7; Issue: 31 Linguagem: Inglês

10.18632/oncotarget.10456

1949-2553

Qian Li, Huiqin Jiang, Hong Li, Rui‐Hua Xu, Lin Shen, Yiyi Yu, Yan Wang, Yuehong Cui, Wei Li, Shan Yu, Tianshu Liu,

HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

// Qian Li 1, * , Huiqin Jiang 1, * , Hong Li 1, * , Ruihua Xu 2 , Lin Shen 3 , Yiyi Yu 1 , Yan Wang 1 , Yuehong Cui 1 , Wei Li 1 , Shan Yu 1 , Tianshu Liu 1 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China 3 Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Tianshu Liu, email: liu.tianshu@zs-hospital.sh.cn Keywords: advanced gastric cancer, HER2, trastuzumab, treatment beyond progression Received: March 18, 2016 Accepted: April 28, 2016 Published: July 07, 2016 ABSTRACT Introduction: Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line regimen in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but lack of data in post-progression treatment. So, it is worth evaluating the efficacy of continuing trastuzumab after failure of the first-line trastuzumab based treatment. Methods: 59 patients were enrolled from Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Peking University Cancer Hospital between September 2012 and Oct 2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to the second line regimens: with or without trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was progression free survival of second line therapy (PFS2). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Baseline factors were well balanced between two groups. 32 patients treated with trastuzumab plus second line chemotherapy (group A) and 27 patients received chemotherapy alone (group B). The median follow-up time was 7.60 months (range 1.50-32.50). Longer median PFS2 was observed in group A than in group B (3.1 vs 2.0 months, P =0.008). There was no significant differences of median OS2 calculating from the second line therapy (10.5 vs 6.5 months, P =0.172) between two groups. Response rate was 9.3% in group A compared with 3.7% in group B ( P =0.617). AEs were similar in two groups including cardiac safety. Subgroup analysis showed that factors of male, age<65, good performance status, HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) 2+ and poor response to first line indicated superior PFS2 in patients continuing trastuzumab to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Conclusion: Continuing treatment of trastuzumab beyond first line therapy progression showed effective and safe in AGC.