Prostate Cancer: Correlation Of Digital Rectal Examination, Transrectal Ultrasound And Prostate Specific Antigen Levels With Tumor Volumes In Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
1990; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 143; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40213-8
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresMorton Palken, Oliver E. Cobb, Bill H. Warren, David C. Hoak,
Tópico(s)Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Urology1 Jun 1990Prostate Cancer: Correlation Of Digital Rectal Examination, Transrectal Ultrasound And Prostate Specific Antigen Levels With Tumor Volumes In Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Morton Palken, Oliver E. Cobb, Bill H. Warren, and David C. Hoak Morton PalkenMorton Palken , Oliver E. CobbOliver E. Cobb , Bill H. WarrenBill H. Warren , and David C. HoakDavid C. Hoak View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40213-8AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Volume and distribution of prostatic carcinoma were measured in 30 radical prostatectomy specimens. Obtaining these data was facilitated by the use of whole tissue mounts. Similar measurements were obtained from preoperative transrectal ultrasound studies. With this information the ability of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound to predict tumor burden was analyzed. It was concluded that both of these examinations are poor predictors of tumor volume, distribution and pathological stage. Preoperative prostate specific antigen levels were correlated with the pathological data. It appeared that prostate specific antigen levels of greater than 10 prestage tumor volumes of greater than 3 cc, and that levels of more than 50 are suggestive of stages C and D disease. © 1990 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLOEB S, HAN M, ROEHL K, ANTENOR J and CATALONA W (2018) ACCURACY OF PROSTATE WEIGHT ESTIMATION BY DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION VERSUS TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHYJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 1, (63-65), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.OBEK C, LOUIS P, CIVANTOS F and SOLOWAY M (2018) COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND BIOPSY RESULTS WITH THE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 2, (494-499), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999.WIEDER J and SOLOWAY M (2018) INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGY, LOCATION, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 2, (299-315), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998.Lerner S, Blute M, Bergstralh E, Bostwick D, Eickholt J and Zincke H (2018) Analysis of Risk Factors for Progression in Patients with Pathologically Confined Prostate Cancers After Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 156, NO. 1, (137-143), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1996.Noldus J and Stamey T (2018) Limitations of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in Predicting Peripheral and Transition Zone Cancer Volumes as Measured by Correlation CoefficientsJournal of Urology, VOL. 155, NO. 1, (232-237), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1996.Giesen R, Huynen A, Aarnink R, de la Rosette J, v.d. Kaa C, Oosterhof G, Debruyne F and Wijkstra H (2018) Computer Analysis of Transrectal Ultrasound Images of Prostate for Detection of Carcinoma: Prospective Study in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 4, (1397-1400), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995.Rommel F, Agusta V, Breslin J, Huffnagle H, Pohl C, Sieber P and Stahl C (2018) The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in a Community Based Urology PracticeJournal of Urology, VOL. 151, NO. 1, (88-93), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1994.Dugan T, Shipley W, Young R, Verhey L, Althausen A, Heney N, McManus P and Abraham E (2018) Biopsy after External Beam Radiation Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Correlation with Original Histological Grade and Current Prostate Specific Antigen LevelsJournal of Urology, VOL. 146, NO. 5, (1313-1316), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1991.Chodak G (2018) Editorial CommentsJournal of Urology, VOL. 145, NO. 1, (90-91), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1991.Palken M, Cobb O, Simons C, Warren B and Aldape H (2018) Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Transrectal Ultrasound for ScreeningJournal of Urology, VOL. 145, NO. 1, (86-90), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1991. Volume 143 Issue 6 June 1990 Page: 1155-1162 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1990 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Morton Palken More articles by this author Oliver E. Cobb More articles by this author Bill H. Warren More articles by this author David C. Hoak More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)