Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Luigi Pareyson’s Estetica: Teoria della formatività and Its Implications for Organization Studies

2016; Academy of Management; Volume: 42; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Italiano

10.5465/amr.2016.0165

1930-3807

Silvia Gherardi, Antonio Strati,

Management Theory and Practice

Academy of Management ReviewVol. 42, No. 4 What Inspires the Academy: Book Reviews and BeyondLuigi Pareyson's Estetica: Teoria della formatività and Its Implications for Organization StudiesSilvia Gherardi and Antonio StratiSilvia GherardiUniversity of Trento and University of Oslo, and and Antonio StratiUniversity of Trento and i3-CRG, Université Paris-SaclayPublished Online:22 Jun 2016https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0165AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAddison J., Steele R. 1982. (First published in 1712.) Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator. (Edited by A. Ross.) London: Penguin. Google ScholarAnceschi L. 1936. Autonomia ed eteronomia dell'arte. Saggio di fenomenologia delle poetiche. Milano: Garzanti. Google ScholarBanfi A. 1988. (First published in 1947.) Vita dell'arte. Scritti di estetica e di filosofia dell'arte—Opere, vol. V. (Edited by E. Mattioli & G. Scaramuzza.) Reggio Emilia: Istituto A. Banfi. Google ScholarBaumgarten A. G. 1750–1758. Aesthetica, vols. I–II. Frankfurt am Oder: Kleyb. Google ScholarBlackler F., Regan S. 2009. Intentionality, agency, change: Practice theory and management. Management Learning, 40: 161–176. Google ScholarCarravetta P. 2010. Review article: Form, person, and inexhaustible interpretation: Luigi Pareyson, Existence, Interpretation, Freedom. Selected Writings. Translated, and with an introduction, by Paolo Diego Bubbio. Davies Group Publishers, 2009. Parrhesia, 12: 99–108. Google ScholarChytry J. 2008. Organizational aesthetics: The artful firm and the aesthetic moment in contemporary business and management theory. Aesthesis: International Journal of Art and Aesthetics in Management and Organizational Life, 2(2): 60–72. Available at http://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/aesthesis/23. Google ScholarCroce B. 1902. Estetica come scienza dell'espressione e linguistica generale. Milano: Adelphi. Google ScholarD'Angelo P. 1997. L'estetica italiana del Novecento. Roma–Bari: Laterza. Google ScholarDean J. W., Ramirez R., Ottensmeyer E. 1997. An aesthetic perspective on organizations. In C. Cooper & S. Jackson (Eds.), Creating tomorrow's organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior: 419–437. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google ScholarDella Volpe G. 1960. Critica del gusto. Milano: Feltrinelli. Google ScholarFeldman M., Orlikowski W. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22: 1240–1253. Google ScholarGadamer H. G. 1977. Die Aktualität des Schönen. Kunst als Spiel, Symbol und Fest. Stuttgart: Phillip Reclam Jr. Google ScholarGagliardi P. 2006. Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 701–724. London: Sage. Google ScholarGarfinkel H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGherardi S. 2000. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations: An introduction. Organization, 7: 211–223. Google ScholarGherardi S. 2009. Practice? It's a matter of taste! Management Learning, 40: 535–550. Google ScholarGherardi S., Nicolini D., Strati A. 2007. The passion for knowing. Organization, 14: 309–323. Google ScholarGherardi S., Perrotta M. 2014. Between the hand and the head: How things get done, and how in doing the ways of doing are discovered. Qualitative Research in Organization and Management, 9: 134–150. Google ScholarGherardi S., Strati A. 2012. Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google ScholarGuillet de Monthoux P. 2004. The art firm: Aesthetic management and metaphysical marketing from Wagner to Wilson. Stanford, CA: Business Books. Google ScholarHennion A. 2001. Music lovers. Taste as performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5): 1–22. Google ScholarHennion A. 2004. Une sociologie des attachements: D'une sociologie de la culture à une pragmatique de l'amateur. Sociétés, 85(3): 9–24. Google ScholarHuman Relations. 2002. Special issue on organizing aesthetics, 55(7). Google ScholarKnorr-Cetina K. 2001. Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 184–197. London: Routledge. Google ScholarLinstead S.Höpfl H. (Eds.). 2000. The aesthetics of organization. London: Sage. Google ScholarMerleau-Ponty M. 2002. Causeries 1948. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Google ScholarOrganization. 1996. Special issue on aesthetics and organization, 3(2). Google ScholarPareyson L. 1943. Studi sull'esistenzialismo. Firenze: Sansoni. (Partial English translation: Pareyson, L. 2009. Existence, interpretation, freedom: Selected writings. [Edited and translated by P. D. Bubbio.] Aurora, CO: Davies Group.) Google ScholarPareyson L. 1950. Arte e conoscenza: Intuizione e interpretazione. Filosofia, 2. (Partial English translation: Pareyson, L. 2009: Existence, interpretation, freedom: Selected writings. [Edited and translated by P. D. Bubbio.] Aurora, CO: Davies Group.) Google ScholarPareyson L. 1954. Estetica: Teoria della formatività. Torino: Edizioni di Filosofia. (Partial English translation: Pareyson, L. 2009. Existence, interpretation, freedom: Selected writings. [Edited and translated by P. D. Bubbio.] Aurora, CO: Davies Group.) Google ScholarPareyson L. 1966. Conversazioni di estetica. Milano: Mursia. Google ScholarPareyson L. 1988. Estetica: Teoria della formatività (4th ed.). Milano: Bompiani. Google ScholarPareyson L. 2013. Truth and interpretation. (Translated by Valgenti R. T..) Albany, NY: SUNY Press. (Original Italian publication: Pareyson, L. 1971. Verità e interpretazione. Milano: Mursia.) Google ScholarPolanyi M. 1958. Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google ScholarPrzychodzen J.Boucher F. E.David S. (Eds.). 2010. L'esthétique du beau ordinaire dans une perspective transdisciplinaire. Ni du gouffre ni du ciel. Paris: l'Harmattan. Google ScholarRestaino F. 1991. Storia dell'estetica moderna. Torino: UTET. Google ScholarRouse J. 2001. Two concepts of practices. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 189–198. London: Routledge. Google ScholarShotter J. 2012. Knowledge in transition: The role of prospective, descriptive concepts in a practice-situated, hermeneutical-phronetic social science. Management Learning, 43: 245–260. Google ScholarStrati A. 1992. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 17: 568–581.Link , Google ScholarStrati A. 1999. Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage. Google ScholarStrati A. 2007. Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38: 61–77. Google ScholarStrati A. 2016. Aesthetics and design: An epistemology of the unseen. In R. Mir, H. Willmott, & M. Greenwood (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies: 251–259. London: Routledge. Google ScholarStrati A., Gherardi S. 2015. La philosophie de Luigi Pareyson et la recherche esthétique des pratiques organisationnelles: Un dialogue. Le Libellio d'Aegis, 11(3): 21–33. Available at http://lelibellio.com/. Google ScholarTiberghien G. A. 2007. Introduction. In L. Pareyson, Esthétique: Théorie de la formativité: 3–18. (Translated into French by G. A. Tiberghien.) Paris: Éditions Rue d'Ulm. Google ScholarVattimo G. 1977. Introduzione. In G. Vattimo (Ed.), Estetica moderna: 7–46. Bologna: Il Mulino. Google ScholarVercellone F., Bertinetto A., Garelli G. 2003. Storia dell'estetica moderna e contemporanea. Bologna: Il Mulino. Google ScholarVico G. 1725. Principi di una scienza nuova. Napoli: Mosca. Google ScholarWittgenstein L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. London: Blackwell. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Aesthetic Dimension of Organizing: A Review and Research AgendaGiada Baldessarelli, Ileana Stigliani and Kimberly D. Elsbach26 January 2022 | Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 16, No. 1 Vol. 42, No. 4 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 22 June 2016 Published in print 1 October 2017 Information© Academy of Management ReviewDownload PDF