Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Comparative life cycle assessment of ceramic brick, concrete brick and cast-in-place reinforced concrete exterior walls

2016; Elsevier BV; Volume: 137; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.069

1879-1786

Danielle Maia de Souza, Mia Lafontaine, François Charron-Doucet, Benoit Chappert, Karine Kicak, Fernanda Duarte, L.M.R. Lima,

Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

The construction sector has a meaningful contribution to the global scarcity of natural resources, as well as to impacts on the natural environment. Most life cycle assessments have focused on impacts associated with the energy efficiency of buildings, in particular during the operational phase. However, the construction phase of buildings accounts for a significant share of a building's embodied energy and is responsible for impacts related to resource depletion. With the aim to contribute to more all-embracing assessments in the construction sector, this study aims to compare three different wall types commonly used in Brazil, according to their environmental performances: ceramic brick, concrete brick and cast-in-place reinforced concrete exterior walls. The results were analyzed with the software SimaPro 7.3 and with the life cycle impact assessment method IMPACT 2002+ (version Q2.2). Ceramic brick walls have less impact than the concrete brick and the cast-in-place reinforced concrete exterior walls on three different endpoint indicators (Climate Change, Resource Depletion and Water Withdrawal). The results were not significant regarding impacts on Human Health and Ecosystem Quality. Different sensitivity analyses were carried out in order to test the final results, as well as uncertainty analysis, related to the variability of inventory data and the characterization of the life cycle inventory results into midpoints and/or endpoints.