Artigo Revisado por pares

Ottoman Mİllets in the Early Seventeenth Century

1994; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 11; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1017/s0896634600001011

ISSN

1305-3299

Autores

Daniel Goffman,

Tópico(s)

Ottoman Empire History and Society

Resumo

The concept of “ millet ” rivals other ideas, such as “the ghazi state” and “the decline paradigm,” as one of the principal formations around which Ottoman historiography has been constructed. Significantly, it was the Ottomans themselves who originated, and manufactured powerful illusions around, each of these notions. Fifteenth-century post-Interregnum (1402-1412) historians probably invented the view that the Osmanlılar of the previous century had constituted the pre-eminent ghazi principality along the Byzantine frontier; late-sixteenth and seventeenth-century Ottoman critics certainly concocted the proposal that the state was decaying after a brilliant epoch under Mehmed II, Bayezid II, Selim I, and Süleyman I (1451-1566); and post-Tanzimat (1839) reformers formulated the construct of millet as a defining characteristic of Ottoman society. Modern historians have tended to accept these models rather uncritically; only recently have we begun to examine the contents and contexts of such Ottoman self-portraits.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX