Artigo Revisado por pares

Fundamentals of Language . Roman Jakobson , Morris Halle

1957; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 23; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Sueco

10.1086/464414

ISSN

1545-7001

Autores

Noam Chomsky,

Tópico(s)

Historical Linguistics and Language Studies

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and ReviewsFundamentals of Language. Roman Jakobson , Morris Halle Noam ChomskyNoam ChomskyPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by International Journal of American Linguistics Volume 23, Number 3Jul., 1957 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/464414 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 35Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Charles Reiss, Veno Volenec Naturalism, Internalism, and Nativism: < What > The Legacy of The Sound Pattern of English < Should Be >, (Jun 2021): 96–108.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119598732.ch6Yanying Cui, Yidong Wei Reduction: The Solution to Mind Representation?, Chinese Semiotic Studies 15, no.33 (Aug 2019): 303–315.https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0019Andrea Scaiewicz, Michael Levitt The language of the protein universe, Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 35 (Dec 2015): 50–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.08.010Morris Halle The Stress of English Words 1968–1998, Linguistic Inquiry 29, no.44 (Oct 1998): 539–568.https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553879S. Ullman Against direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 373–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000546XO. J. Braddick Direct perception: an opponent and a precursor of computational theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 381–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005471Bruce Bridgeman Direct perception and a call for primary perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 382–383.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005483Jonathan F. Doner, Joseph S. Lappin The function and process of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 383–384.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005495William Epstein Direct perception or mediated perception: a comparison of rival viewpoints, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 384–385.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005501Stephen Grossberg Direct perception or adaptive resonance?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 385–386.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005513John W. Gyr Visual perception is underdetermined by stimulation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 386–386.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005525Frederick Hayes-Roth Mediating the so-called immediate processes of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 386–387.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005537Geoffrey E. Hinton Inferring the meaning of direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 387–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005549Gunnar Johansson, Claes von Hofsten, Gunnar Jansson Direct perception and perceptual processes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 388–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005550Rebecca K. Jones, Anne D. Pick On the nature of information in behalf of direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 388–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005562Samuel Jay Keyser, Steven Pinker Direct vs. representational views of cognition: A parallel between vision and phonology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 389–390.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005574J. J. Koenderink Why argue about direct perception?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 390–391.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005586Geoffrey R. Loftus, Elizabeth F. Loftus Visual perception: the shifting domain of discourse, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 391–392.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005598William M. Mace Perceptual activity and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 392–393.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005604Alan K. Mackworth Are mediating representations the ghosts in the machine?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 393–394.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005616K. Prazdny How wrong is Gibson?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 394–395.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005628Sandra S. Prindle, Claudia Carello, M. T. Turvey Animal-environment mutuality and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 395–397.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000563XEdward S. Reed Information pickup is the activity of perceiving, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 397–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005641Irvin Rock Difficulties with a direct theory of perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 398–399.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005653Sverker Runeson There is more to psychological meaningfulness than computation and representation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 399–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005665Robert Shaw, James Todd Abstract machine theory and direct perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 400–401.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005677Aaron Sloman What kind of indirect process is visual perception?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 401–404.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005689K. von Fieandt In defense of invariances and higher-order stimuli, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 404–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005690Walter B. Welmer Logical atomism and computation do not refute Gibson, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005707Wally Welker Percepts, intervening variables, and neural mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–406.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005719Steven W. Zucker The computational/representational paradigm as normal science: further support, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 406–407.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005720Carl B. Zuckerman What are the contributions of the direct perception approach?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 407–408.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005732S. Ullman Perception, information, and computation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.33 (Feb 2010): 408–415.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005744W. Meyer-Eppler Akustische und optische Valenzklassen als Zeichenträger, (Jan 1969): 346–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86901-3_9W. Meyer-Eppler Akustische und optische Valenzklassen als Zeichenträger, (Jan 1959): 282–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52949-8_9

Referência(s)