Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

International Expert Consensus on Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Valves in Aortic Valve Replacement Using Minimally Invasive Approaches

2016; SAGE Publishing; Volume: 11; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1097/imi.0000000000000287

1559-0879

Mattia Glauber, Simon C. Moten, Eugenio Quaini, Marco Solinas, Thierry Folliguet, Bart Meuris, Antonio Miceli, Peter Oberwalder, Manfredo Rambaldini, Kevin Teoh, Gopal Bhatnagar, Michael A. Borger, Denis Bouchard, Olivier Bouchot, Stephen Clark, O. Dapunt, Matteo Ferrarini, Theodor Fischlein, Günther Laufer, Carmelo Mignosa, Russell Millner, Philippe Noirhomme, Steffen Pfeiffer, Xavier Ruyra-Baliarda, Malakh Shrestha, Rakesh M. Suri, Giovanni Troise, Borut Geršak,

Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Objective To define the benefit of sutureless and rapid deployment valves in current minimally invasive approaches in isolated aortic valve replacement. Methods A panel of 28 international experts with expertise in both minimally invasive aortic valve replacement and rapid deployment valves was constituted. After thorough literature review, the experts rated evidence-based recommendations in a modified Delphi approach. Results No guideline could be retrieved. Thirty-three clinical trials and 9 systematic reviews could be identified for detailed text analysis to obtain a total of 24 recommendations. After rating by the experts 12, final recommendations were identified: preoperative computed to-mographic scan as well as intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography are highly recommended. Suitable annular sizes are 19 to 27 mm. There is a contraindication for bicuspid valves only for type 0 and for annular abscess or destruction due to infective endocarditis. The use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves reduces extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamp time and leads to less early complications as prolonged ventilation, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions, paravalvular leakages and aortic regurgitation, and renal replacement therapy, respectively. These clinical outcomes result in reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay and reduced costs. The use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves will lead to a higher adoption rate of minimally invasive approaches in aortic valve replacement. Respect should be taken to a necessary short learning curve for both sutureless and minimally invasive programs. Conclusions Sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement together with minimally invasive approaches offers an attractive option in aortic valve placement for patients requiring biological valve replacement.