Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Methods in Structural Linguistics . Zellig S. Harris

1952; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 18; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/464181

1545-7001

Fred W. Householder,

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Previous articleNext article No AccessReviews and NotesMethods in Structural Linguistics. Zellig S. Harris Fred W. Householder Jr.Fred W. Householder Jr. Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by International Journal of American Linguistics Volume 18, Number 4Oct., 1952 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/464181 Views: 13Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Feifei Zhou Labov: Systemic Variation and Knowledge, (Mar 2020): 41–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1255-1_5Kelly Becker, Iain D. Thomson The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015, 20 (Nov 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779651Jan E.M. Houben Linguistic Paradox and Diglossia: the emergence of Sanskrit and Sanskritic language in Ancient India, Open Linguistics 4, no.11 (May 2018): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0001Stephen J. Cowley Changing the idea of language: Nigel Love's perspective, Language Sciences 61 (May 2017): 43–55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.008Laurie Bauer Classical Morphemics: Assumptions, Extensions, and Alternatives, (Nov 2016): 331–355.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.013Bill Louw, Marija Milojkovic Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext, 23 (May 2016).https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.23Stephen J. Cowley Verbal Patterns: Taming Cognitive Biology, (Jan 2015): 123–148.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20663-9_7 Aspects of Modelling, (Oct 2013): 53–78.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118706664.ch3Ian Maddieson Phonology, Naturalness and Universals, Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45, no.11 (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0010-xS.-H. Seong Householder, Fred W., Jr. (1913?1994), (Jan 2006): 398–399.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02632-8E.F.K Koerner Remarks on the origins of morphophonemics in American structuralist linguistics, Language & Communication 23, no.11 (Jan 2003): 1–43.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00024-1Erik C. Fudge Post-Bloomfieldian Phonology, (Jan 1995): 306–314.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50053-2CHRISTOPHER HUTTON Analysis and notation: the case for a non-realist linguistics, (Jan 1993): 165–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-041937-4.50011-8Herbert Penzl Positivism and ‘Hocus-pocus’ in Germanic and English Linguistics, American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 1, no.11 (Dec 2008): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542700000040Bernard Spolsky The limits of authenticity in language testi ng, Language Testing 2, no.11 (Aug 2016): 31–40.https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200104Charles-James N. Bailey Theory, description and differences among linguists (or, what keeps linguistics from becoming a science), Language & Communication 1, no.11 (Jan 1981): 39–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(81)90005-7Alphonse Juilland, James Macris Simplicity, WORD 28, no.33 (Jun 2015): 275–304.https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1977.11435646