Carta Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Transient Cerebral Arteriopathy, Postvaricella Arteriopathy, and Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy or the Unique Susceptibility of the M1 Segment in Children With Stroke

2016; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 47; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/strokeaha.116.014606

ISSN

1524-4628

Autores

Stéphane Chabrier, Guillaume Sébire, Joël Fluss,

Tópico(s)

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Resumo

HomeStrokeVol. 47, No. 10Transient Cerebral Arteriopathy, Postvaricella Arteriopathy, and Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy or the Unique Susceptibility of the M1 Segment in Children With Stroke Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBTransient Cerebral Arteriopathy, Postvaricella Arteriopathy, and Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy or the Unique Susceptibility of the M1 Segment in Children With Stroke Stéphane Chabrier, MD, Guillaume Sébire, MD, PhD and Joel Fluss, MD Stéphane ChabrierStéphane Chabrier From the CHU Saint-Étienne, French Center for Pediatric Stroke, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Étienne F-42055, France (S.C.); Child Neurology Division, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Canada (G.S.); and Pediatric Neurology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Children's Hospital, Genève, Switzerland (J.F.). , Guillaume SébireGuillaume Sébire From the CHU Saint-Étienne, French Center for Pediatric Stroke, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Étienne F-42055, France (S.C.); Child Neurology Division, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Canada (G.S.); and Pediatric Neurology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Children's Hospital, Genève, Switzerland (J.F.). and Joel FlussJoel Fluss From the CHU Saint-Étienne, French Center for Pediatric Stroke, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Étienne F-42055, France (S.C.); Child Neurology Division, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Canada (G.S.); and Pediatric Neurology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Children's Hospital, Genève, Switzerland (J.F.). Originally published15 Sep 2016https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014606Stroke. 2016;47:2439–2441Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: January 1, 2016: Previous Version 1 See related article, p 2443.Like many disorders, the incidence of arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) throughout life is represented by a U-shaped curve. The peripartum period carries the highest risk, whereas people from 29 days to 18 years have the lowest risk. The incidence then gradually increases from adolescence to old age. Furthermore, the mechanisms of AIS are also age dependent. Placental–cerebral embolism is the most widely accepted hypothesis in perinatal AIS, whereas long-standing and diffuse arterial disease (namely, atherosclerosis) is the leading cause in adults. In childhood as well, stenosing arteriopathies are the most frequent causes of AIS.1–4 Some of them, such as cervical dissection, moyamoya, sickle-cell arteriopathy or other specific diagnoses (postirradiation arteriopathy, neurofibromatosis, fibromuscular dysplasia, reversible vasoconstriction syndrome…) are well recognized. Nevertheless, after exclusion of these disorders, a large proportion of children (notably those previously healthy) are diagnosed with another type of arterial disease, which is characteristically focal, intracranial, and monophasic. Because the nature of the arterial insult is largely unknown, patients with these features have been reported under diverse nosography (Table), which refers to the angiographic appearance and the time course rather than to a pathophysiological mechanism. Each definition has its proper advantages and limitations. Yet the great majority of cases of focal cerebral arteriopathy (FCA) regress or stabilize along time, thus being a posteriori defined as transient cerebral arteriopathy (TCA), and a large proportion of these are preceded by varicella, thus reaching the definition of postvaricella arteriopathy (PVA).5–8 Finally, TCA also shares the imaging features of the nonprogressive form of medium-large vessel childhood primary angiitis of the central nervous system, mostly reported in the rheumatologic literature.9Table. Nosography of the TCA/PVA/FCA ComplexNosology (Year of Description)DefinitionAdvantagesLimitationsTransient cerebral arteriopathy (TCA, 1998)Unilateral focal/segmental stenosis or occlusion involving distal part of internal carotid and initial segments of anterior or middle cerebral artery.Nonprogression of arterial lesions >6 mo, compared with baseline angiogramArteriopathic course correlated with outcome.Recognized for a long timeDiagnosis only suspected initially; needs time to be confirmedPostvaricella arteriopathy (PVA, 2005)Stroke occurring 3 mo after baseline angiogramArteriopathic course correlated with outcomeDiagnosis only suspected initially; needs time to be confirmed.Follow-up at 3 mo probably too short. Some arteriopathies continue to progress until 6 mo, whereas they remain nonprogressive in the long termIn this issue of Stroke, Bernard et al and the Colorado Group10 confirm the high prevalence of FCA in their assessment of the metrological properties of the CASCADE classification (Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke Standardized Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation), based on a random sample from a large international population of children with AIS. But, another striking finding is that—although a near-perfect inter-rater agreement is reached for the nonambiguous causes of stroke: cardioembolic process (κ=0.84) and bilateral arteriopathies (probably moyamoya or other progressive diffuse intracranial arteriopathies; κ=0.90)—the agreement is moderate when assessing FCA (κ=0.49). This is particularly noticeable, when considering that the study was performed with highly experienced practitioners, who moreover had participated in a previous training session. Eventually, it highlights the challenges in categorizing specific childhood cerebral arteriopathies.10The considerable overlap between TCA, PVA, and FCA suggests that they might represent the end point of similar vascular pathogenic processes triggered by various insults. Indeed, the prominent imaging feature is the unique distribution of the arterial lesions along the M1 segment, the distal internal carotid artery, and the proximal anterior cerebral artery. One can only speculate on the explanations for such a high susceptibility of the carotid trifurcation, while acknowledging that a similar distribution is also observed in other childhood arteriopathies, such as moyamoya, meningitis induced–cerebral vasculopathy, HIV arteriopathy, sickle-cell disease… The growing evidence that infection is a major contributor of childhood AIS could point to direct contiguous parietal effects from an inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid. Yet, true large vessel arteritis is rarely demonstrated in the setting of purulent meningitis.11,12 In addition, a purely contiguity mechanism does not explain the sparing of the posterior circulation. In the specific case of PVA, the latent varicella zoster virus that has reactivated in the Gasser ganglion can reach the carotid and the middle cerebral arteries via axonal flow and then spread through the vessel wall.13,14 The subsequent localized parietal inflammation induces stenosis and endoluminal thrombosis. But this seductive mechanism, supported by pathological specimens, cannot be applied to other infectious agents. So how can one explain that, clinically and radiologically, PVA does not really differ from TCA? It seems reasonable to presume that the tortuous carotid trifurcation is more vulnerable whatever the trigger is, due to specific rheological characteristics and eventually to other mechanical stressors, such as dissection, and immunologic properties.15,16 We can hypothesize that the initial vascular insult is more spread out than visually observed but that arterial wall remodeling occurs only in susceptible sites.Twenty years after its formal description, the debate around the TCA/FCA/PVA complex is not only a theoretical issue. Indeed, the outcome depends primarily on the evolution (progression versus stability/regression) of the arteriopathy, knowing that stroke rarely recurs when the stenosis has stopped its progression.5–7 It is, thus, a crucial challenge for the clinician and a key issue for the patient to determine early predictors of the arteriopathic course and to distinguish a space- and time-limiting pathological process from the early stages of a chronic and diffuse arterial disease. Earlier diagnosis, cognitive dysfunction at presentation, multifocal/bilateral parenchymal and arterial lesions, occlusion rather than stenosis and moyamoya vessels are predictors of progressive arteriopathy, whereas preceding varicella, basal ganglia infarction, and arterial beading are protective.7,9,17,18 Classical determinants for stroke and biomarkers reflecting endothelial injury and repair can also predict outcome.17,19,20,21 There is also a trend for a better outcome6 and few recurrences17 in children treated with aspirin. In our former report of TCA, recurrence occurred in 3 of 4 children without treatment versus only one of 11 who received aspirin.22 A similar figure was found in Braun TCA study, where 91% of children received antithrombotics, mostly with aspirin alone.7 Recurrence was observed in 10 children, of whom 6 were not receiving any antithrombotics at the time of recurrence.23 In our experience, when an otherwise healthy child with AIS presents with an intracranial unilateral focal arterial stenosis and is promptly treated by aspirin until the arteriopathy stabilizes or regresses, the risk of recurrence is low.24,25Sources of FundingDr Sébire was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Stéphane Chabrier, MD, Centre national de référence de l'AVC de l'enfant, CHU Saint-Étienne, 42055 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France. E-mail [email protected]References1. DeVeber G. Risk factors for childhood stroke: little folks have different strokes!Ann Neurol. 2003; 53:149–150. doi: 10.1002/ana.10461.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Sébire G, Fullerton H, Riou E, deVeber G. Toward the definition of cerebral arteriopathies of childhood.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004; 16:617–622.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Mackay MT, Wiznitzer M, Benedict SL, Lee KJ, Deveber GA, Ganesan V; International Pediatric Stroke Study Group. Arterial ischemic stroke risk factors: the International Pediatric Stroke Study.Ann Neurol. 2011; 69:130–140. doi: 10.1002/ana.22224.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Wintermark M, Hills NK, deVeber GA, Barkovich AJ, Elkind MS, Sear K, et al; VIPS Investigators. Arteriopathy diagnosis in childhood arterial ischemic stroke: results of the vascular effects of infection in pediatric stroke study.Stroke. 2014; 45:3597–3605. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007404.LinkGoogle Scholar5. Lanthier S, Armstrong D, Domi T, deVeber G. Post-varicella arteriopathy of childhood: natural history of vascular stenosis.Neurology. 2005; 64:660–663. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000151851.66154.27.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Danchaivijitr N, Cox TC, Saunders DE, Ganesan V. Evolution of cerebral arteriopathies in childhood arterial ischemic stroke.Ann Neurol. 2006; 59:620–626. doi: 10.1002/ana.20800.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Braun KP, Bulder MM, Chabrier S, Kirkham FJ, Uiterwaal CS, Tardieu M, et al. The course and outcome of unilateral intracranial arteriopathy in 79 children with ischaemic stroke.Brain. 2009; 132(pt 2):544–557. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn313.MedlineGoogle Scholar8. Amlie-Lefond C, Bernard TJ, Sébire G, Friedman NR, Heyer GL, Lerner NB, et al; International Pediatric Stroke Study Group. Predictors of cerebral arteriopathy in children with arterial ischemic stroke: results of the International Pediatric Stroke Study.Circulation. 2009; 119:1417–1423. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.806307.LinkGoogle Scholar9. Cellucci T, Tyrrell PN, Sheikh S, Benseler SM. Childhood primary angiitis of the central nervous system: identifying disease trajectories and early risk factors for persistently higher disease activity.Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64:1665–1672. doi: 10.1002/art.34527.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Bernard TJ, Beslow LA, Manco-Johnson MJ, Armstrong-Wells J, Boada R, Weitzenkamp D, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the CASCADE criteria: challenges in classifying arteriopathies.Stroke. 2016; 47:2443–2449. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013544.LinkGoogle Scholar11. Schut ES, Brouwer MC, de Gans J, Florquin S, Troost D, van de Beek D. Delayed cerebral thrombosis after initial good recovery from pneumococcal meningitis.Neurology. 2009; 73:1988–1995. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c55d2e.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Steiner I. Past as prologue: delayed stroke as a parainfectious process of bacterial meningitis?Neurology. 2009; 73:1945–1946. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c55d43.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Berger TM, Caduff JH, Gebbers JO. Fatal varicella-zoster virus antigen-positive giant cell arteritis of the central nervous system.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19:653–656.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Amlie-Lefond C, Gilden D. Varicella zoster virus: a common cause of stroke in children and adults.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 25:1561–1569. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.052.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. Hademenos GJ, Massoud TF. Biophysical mechanisms of stroke.Stroke. 1997; 28:2067–2077.LinkGoogle Scholar16. Wei F, Diedrich KT, Fullerton HJ, deVeber G, Wintermark M, Hodge J, et al; Vascular Effects of Infection in Pediatric Stroke (VIPS) Investigators. Arterial tortuosity: an imaging biomarker of childhood stroke pathogenesis?Stroke. 2016; 47:1265–1270. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011331.LinkGoogle Scholar17. Ganesan V, Prengler M, Wade A, Kirkham FJ. Clinical and radiological recurrence after childhood arterial ischemic stroke.Circulation. 2006; 114:2170–2177. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583690.LinkGoogle Scholar18. Yeon JY, Shin HJ, Seol HJ, Kim JS, Hong SC. Unilateral intracranial arteriopathy in pediatric stroke: course, outcome, and prediction of reversible arteriopathy.Stroke. 2014; 45:1173–1176. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004125.LinkGoogle Scholar19. Hills NK, Fullerton HJ. Atherosclerotic stroke in children? A public health red flag.Ann Neurol. 2011; 70:675–676. doi: 10.1002/ana.22636.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Eleftheriou D, Ganesan V, Hong Y, Klein NJ, Brogan PA. Endothelial repair in childhood arterial ischaemic stroke with cerebral arteriopathy.Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2015; 5:68–74. doi: 10.1159/000381963.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21. Fullerton HJ, deVeber GA, Hills NK, Dowling MM, Fox CK, Mackay MT, et al; VIPS Investigators. Inflammatory biomarkers in childhood arterial ischemic stroke: correlates of stroke cause and recurrence.Stroke. 2016; 47:2221–2228. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013719.LinkGoogle Scholar22. Chabrier S, Husson B, Lasjaunias P, Landrieu P, Tardieu M. Stroke in childhood: outcome and recurrence risk by mechanism in 59 patients.J Child Neurol. 2000; 15:290–294.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23. Chabrier S, Darteyre S, Kirkham FJ, Braun KPJ, Rousselle C, Rivier F, et al. Which trials with anticoagulants do children with stroke actually need?Blood. 2012; 119:949–956. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361535. http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/119/4/949/tab-e-letters. Accessed July 2016.Google Scholar24. Touré A, Chabrier S, Plagne MD, Presles E, des Portes V, Rousselle C. Neurological outcome and risk of recurrence depending on the anterior vs. posterior arterial distribution in children with stroke.Neuropediatrics. 2009; 40:126–128. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1238306.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25. Darteyre S, Chabrier S, Presles E, Bonafé A, Roubertie A, Echenne B, et al. Lack of progressive arteriopathy and stroke recurrence among children with cryptogenic stroke.Neurology. 2012; 79:2342–2348. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318278b629.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Benseler S (2022) Zerebrale Vaskulitiden bei Kindern und Jugendlichen Pädiatrische Rheumatologie, 10.1007/978-3-662-60410-6_50, (697-706), . Gerstl L, Borggräfe I, Heinen F and Olivieri M (2022) Arteriell ischämischer Schlaganfall im Kindes- und JugendalterArterial ischemic stroke in childhood and adolescence, Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 10.1007/s00112-022-01465-0, 170:5, (458-471), Online publication date: 1-May-2022. Gerstl L, Olivieri M, Heinen F, Bidlingmaier C, Schroeder A, Reiter K, Hoffmann F, Kurnik K, Liebig T, Trumm C, Haas N, Jakob A and Borggraefe I (2022) Notfall-Neuropädiatrie – Der arteriell ischämische Schlaganfall als einer der zeitkritischsten Notfälle bei Kindern und JugendlichenStroke alarm—Arterial ischemic stroke as one of the most time-critical emergencies in children and adolescents, Der Nervenarzt, 10.1007/s00115-021-01252-4, 93:2, (158-166), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022. Chabrier S, Ozanne A, Naggara O, Boulouis G, Husson B and Kossorotoff M (2020) Hyperacute Recanalization Strategies and Childhood Stroke in the Evidence Age, Stroke, 52:1, (381-384), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021. Bertamino M, Signa S, Veneruso M, Prato G, Caorsi R, Losurdo G, Teutonico F, Esposito S, Formica F, Tovaglieri N, Nagel M, Amico G, Zanetti A, Tortora D, Rossi A, Moretti P, Gattorno M, Ravelli A, Severino M, Di Rocco M, Cornaglia S, Tacchino C, Ceccherini I, Banov L, Nobili L, Palmieri A, Pavanello M, Ramenghi L, Ronchetti A, Uccella S and Volpi S (2021) Expanding the clinical and neuroimaging features of post-varicella arteriopathy of childhood, Journal of Neurology, 10.1007/s00415-021-10606-6, 268:12, (4846-4865), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Sood A, Suthar R, Sahu J, K. Baranwal A, Saini A, Saini L, Vyas S, Khandelwal N and Sankhyan N (2021) Etiologic Profile of Childhood Stroke from North India: Is It Different from Developed World?, Journal of Child Neurology, 10.1177/0883073821991291, 36:8, (655-663), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021. McKenna M, Fanning N and Cronin S (2020) Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy in Young Adult Patients With Stroke, Stroke, 51:5, (1596-1599), Online publication date: 1-May-2020. Kumar R, Governale L and Lo W (2020) Childhood Stroke Clinical Child Neurology, 10.1007/978-3-319-43153-6_21, (679-729), . Moussouttas M and Rybinnik I (2020) A critical appraisal of bypass surgery in moyamoya disease, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 10.1177/1756286420921092, 13, (175628642092109), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Kossorotoff M, Chabrier S, Tran Dong K, Nguyen The Tich S and Dinomais M (2020) Arterial ischemic stroke in non-neonate children: Diagnostic and therapeutic specificities, Revue Neurologique, 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.03.005, 176:1-2, (20-29), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Benseler S (2021) Zerebrale Vaskulitiden bei Kindern und Jugendlichen Pädiatrische Rheumatologie, 10.1007/978-3-662-60411-3_50-1, (1-10), . Durrleman C, Naggara O, Grevent D, Belot A, Desgranges M, Boyer O, Chabrier S, Bader‐Meunier B and Kossorotoff M (2018) Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in paediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for management, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 10.1111/dmcn.14031, 61:6, (725-729), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019. Nash M and Rafay M (2019) Craniocervical Arterial Dissection in Children: Pathophysiology and Management, Pediatric Neurology, 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.01.020, 95, (9-18), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019. Kossorotoff M, Dinomais M and Chabrier S (2019) Accident vasculaire cérébral de l'enfant : épidémiologie, filières de prise en charge et spécificités pédiatriques, Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine, 10.1016/j.banm.2019.07.005, 203:7, (505-512), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019. Goyal P, Malhotra A, Almast J, Sapire J, Gupta S, Mangla M and Mangla R (2019) Neuroimaging of Pediatric Arteriopathies, Journal of Neuroimaging, 10.1111/jon.12614, 29:3, (287-308), Online publication date: 1-May-2019. Monteventi O, Steinlin M, Regényi M, Roulet-Perez E, Weber P and Fluss J (2018) Pediatric stroke related to Lyme neuroborreliosis: Data from the Swiss NeuroPaediatric Stroke Registry and literature review, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.10.010, 22:1, (113-121), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Ramasamy S, Alagappan P, Venkataraman V, Chellathurai A, Alagarsamy S and Mani P (2018) PAEDIATRIC STROKE- AN ANALYSIS ON ARTERY OF PAEDIATRIC INFARCT- LENTICULOSTRIATE ARTERIES, Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 10.14260/jemds/2018/574, 7:21, (2550-2554), Online publication date: 21-May-2018. Sudhakar S, Muthusamy K and Shroff M (2018) Imaging of Childhood Inflammatory Brain Diseases, Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000187, 27:6, (409-431), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Elbers J, Armstrong D, Benseler S, Dlamini N, Steinberg G and Yeom K (2018) The Utility of Collaterals as a Biomarker in Pediatric Unilateral Intracranial Arteriopathy, Pediatric Neurology, 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.08.009, 78, (27-34), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Steinlin M (2017) Neuroinflammation in Ischemic Pediatric Stroke, Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 10.1016/j.spen.2017.08.006, 24:3, (201-206), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017. Wintermark M, Hills N, DeVeber G, Barkovich A, Bernard T, Friedman N, Mackay M, Kirton A, Zhu G, Leiva-Salinas C, Hou Q and Fullerton H (2017) Clinical and Imaging Characteristics of Arteriopathy Subtypes in Children with Arterial Ischemic Stroke: Results of the VIPS Study, American Journal of Neuroradiology, 10.3174/ajnr.A5376, 38:11, (2172-2179), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017. Bell D and Guerreiro C (2021) Focal cerebral arteriopathy of childhood Radiopaedia.org, 10.53347/rID-88592 Chen L, Shaw D, Dager S, Corrigan N, Chu B, Kleinhans N, Kuhl P, Hwang J and Yuan C (2021) Quantitative Assessment of the Intracranial Vasculature of Infants and Adults Using iCafe (Intracranial Artery Feature Extraction), Frontiers in Neurology, 10.3389/fneur.2021.668298, 12 October 2016Vol 47, Issue 10 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014606PMID: 27633022 Originally publishedSeptember 15, 2016 KeywordschildinfarctionEditorialsstrokebiomarkerscerebral arteriopathyPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCerebrovascular Disease/StrokeStenosis

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX