Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Clinical Features, Imaging Characteristics, and Long‐term Outcome of Dogs with Cranial Meningocele or Meningoencephalocele

2017; Wiley; Volume: 31; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/jvim.14638

1939-1676

Kali Lazzerini, Rodrigo Gutierrez‐Quintana, Roberto José‐López, Fraser McConnell, Rita Gonçalves, J. McMurrough, Steven De Decker, Clare Muir, Simon L. Priestnall, Lorenzo Mari, Fabio Stabile, Luisa De Risio, C Loeffler, Anna Tauro, Clare Rusbridge, Sergio Ródenas, Sònia Añor, Cristian de la Fuente, Andrea Fischer, Andreas Bruehschwein, Jacques Penderis, Julien Guevar,

Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments

Background The term meningoencephalocele ( MEC ) describes a herniation of cerebral tissue and meninges through a defect in the cranium, whereas a meningocele ( MC ) is a herniation of the meninges alone. Hypothesis/Objectives To describe the clinical features, magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) characteristics, and outcomes of dogs with cranial MC and MEC . Animals Twenty‐two client‐owned dogs diagnosed with cranial MC or MEC . Methods Multicentric retrospective descriptive study. Clinical records of 13 institutions were reviewed. Signalment, clinical history, neurologic findings and MRI characteristics as well as treatment and outcome were recorded and evaluated. Results Most affected dogs were presented at a young age (median, 6.5 months; range, 1 month – 8 years). The most common presenting complaints were seizures and behavioral abnormalities. Intranasal MEC was more common than parietal MC . Magnetic resonance imaging identified meningeal enhancement of the protruded tissue in 77% of the cases. Porencephaly was seen in all cases with parietal MC . Cerebrospinal fluid ( CSF ) analysis identified mild abnormalities in 4 of 11 cases. Surgery was not performed in any affected dog. Seventeen patients were treated medically, and seizures were adequately controlled with anti‐epileptic drugs in 10 dogs. Dogs with intranasal MEC and mild neurologic signs had a fair prognosis with medical treatment. Conclusion and clinical importance Although uncommon, MC and MEC should be considered as a differential diagnosis in young dogs presenting with seizures or alterations in behavior. Medical treatment is a valid option with a fair prognosis when the neurologic signs are mild.