Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; alarming variables for postoperative bleeding
2017; Elsevier BV; Volume: 15; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.aju.2016.12.001
ISSN2090-5998
AutoresShakhawan Hama Amin Said, Mohammed Abed Al Kadum Hassan, Rawa Hama Ghareeb Ali, Ismaeel Aghaways, Fahmi H. Kakamad, Khalid Q. Mohammad,
Tópico(s)Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
ResumoTo evaluate factors contributing to bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ways of managing this complication, as bleeding is a serious sequela that requires prompt management.The demographic and procedural data of 200 patients, who underwent unilateral PCNL during a 20-month period, were prospectively collected. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative details were recorded. The preoperative variables analysed included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, degree of hydronephrosis, previous ipsilateral open renal surgery, stone size and complexity. The operative variables analysed included: number of tracts, operative time, size of Amplatz sheath, type of anaesthesia, and complications such as calyceal and pelvic perforation.The variables of age, sex, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and a preoperative creatinine level of >1.4 mg/dL had no significant effect on blood loss (all P > 0.05). However, the rate of bleeding was significantly higher (P ⩽ 0.05) in patients who had a history of previous open renal surgery, intraoperative pelvicalyceal perforations, and Guy's Stone Score (GSS) grade 3 and 4 complex stones; however, absence of hydronephrosis, larger stone size, operative time (>83 min), more than one puncture, and size of the Amplatz sheath (26-30 F) did not maintain their significance in multivariate analysis.According to our present results stone complexity (GSS grade 3 and 4), history of ipsilateral renal stone surgery, and occurrence of intraoperative pelvicalyceal perforation are alarming variables for post-PCNL bleeding.
Referência(s)