Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Hypertension Opens the Flood Gates to the Gut Microbiota

2017; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 120; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/circresaha.116.310339

1524-4571

W. Robert Taylor, Kiyoko Takemiya,

Dietary Effects on Health

HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 120, No. 2Hypertension Opens the Flood Gates to the Gut Microbiota Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBHypertension Opens the Flood Gates to the Gut Microbiota W. Robert Taylor and Kiyoko Takemiya W. Robert TaylorW. Robert Taylor From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (W.R.T., K.T.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, the Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA (W.R.T.). and Kiyoko TakemiyaKiyoko Takemiya From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (W.R.T., K.T.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, the Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA (W.R.T.). Originally published20 Jan 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310339Circulation Research. 2017;120:249–251There continues to be a rapidly evolving interest in the role of the gut microbiome in cardiovascular disease. It has long been known that the gut microbiome has a fundamentally mutualistic, symbiotic relationship with the human host. However, from earlier observations using mice grown in germ-free environments to more recent advances in identifying unique metabolic products of the gut microbiome,1 the data have led to a compelling story linking cardiovascular disease to the trillions of prokaryotic organisms that live in the human gut.Article, see p 312In this issue of Circulation Research, Santisteban et al2 have provided provocative data demonstrating very definitively that, in 2 different animal models of hypertension, there is decreased expression of several tight junction proteins in the gut and a concomitant increase in intestinal permeability. Furthermore, their data show that in the spontaneously hypertensive rat model, the increase in permeability is a result of increased sympathetic nerve activity before the development of hypertension. They therefore conclude that there is a direct, causal link between the sympathetic nerve activity derived from the central nervous system and increased gut permeability (Figure). They further hypothesize that the changes in gut permeability result in hypertension and cause a shift in the types of bacteria that are present in the gut. Finally, they have shown that the changes in sympathetic activity resulting in increased gut permeability are also associated with an increase in inflammatory cells within the intestinal wall thus potentially bringing the contributions of the immune system to hypertension into this pathophysiological mechanism.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Overview of the impact of the impact of sympathetic nerve stimulation on gut permeability and hypertension.One question raised by this article is the potential relationship between increased gut permeability and changes in the gut microbiome. In the most simplistic mechanism, the increase in gut permeability would allow products of the organisms in the gut access to the tissues in the gastrointestinal tract and the general circulation. However, Santisteban et al2 have suggested a more complicated relationship in that they reported that there was a clear shift in the microbiome after the changes in gut permeability developed. Others have reported differences in the microbiome in hypertension3 so it is clearly not just a matter of allowing access but of also creating a dysbiosis, or an imbalance negatively impacting the beneficial flora of the intestinal tract. How this could occur is not at all clear but, in the current article, the authors noted that mesenteric blood flow was decreased, a phenomenon that has been long been associated with increased intestinal permeability.4 A similar relationship between changes in gut permeability and dysbiosis has been reported with alcohol abuse.5 However, it was hypothesized that phenolic compounds from tyrosine breakdown by the bad bacteria resulted in disruption of the gut epithelial barrier, not vice versa. Whatever the initial sequence, there is a clear case for multiple, synergistic factors functioning in a positive feedback loop involving increased permeability of the gut intestinal epithelium and dysbiosis that ultimately affords the products of an imbalanced gut microbiome access to human host.The nature of the products of the microbiome that are potentially released into the host is potentially vast and includes short chain fatty acids, polyamines, and activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor among a myriad of other potential candidates. In the case of hypertension, short chain fatty acids are a particularly intriguing possibility as they could potentially modulate the active immune environment of the gut. Santisteban et al2 reported that there was a significant increase in T cells and monocytes/macrophages in the intestinal epithelium, which suggests a potential relationship with the immunologic responses that exist in the intestinal mucosa. Among their many actions, short chain fatty acids can act as inhibitors of histone deacetylases that can in turn modify Treg-cell populations and other immune responses.6 A mechanism such as this could conceivably begin to help to converge the roles of gut microbiome with that of the immune system in hypertension.7Finally, the role of the sympathetic nervous system in inducing changes in gut permeability may have even greater impact than that proposed by the authors of this article. Many factors ranging from cigarette smoking8 to mental stress9 alter the balance of the sympathetic nervous system. The potential involvement of mental stress in altered gut permeability through activation of the sympathetic nervous system is particularly intriguing. Given the extensive body of evidence linking mental stress to adverse cardiovascular outcomes10 and data indicating that chronic stress induces changes in intestinal epithelial permeability11 and in the gut microbiome, could changes in the intestinal epithelium play a mechanistic role in the transducing mental stress into increased cardiovascular risk? More expansively, could changes in gut permeability be another dimension to the mechanisms of action of multiple additional risk factors for hypertension that alter sympathetic nerve activity?One of the implications of the current study and that of others in this field is that there are now new opportunities to develop novel therapeutic strategies targeting the intestinal epithelium to treat or even prevent hypertension. Probiotics have been proposed by many as a method to restore a healthy intestinal microbiome. Probiotics have been studied as potential therapeutics for hypertension by several investigators, but the efficacy is modest at best in a limited number of studies of highly variable quality12 leaving it unclear whether probiotics will ever prove to be sufficiently potent therapeutic agents. However, if Santisteban et al2 are correct in that sympathetic nervous system–mediated gut increased permeability precedes the development of hypertension, then perhaps our therapeutic focus should also be on these early steps in the pathological cascade. Most simplistically, could sympatholytic agents have a positive impact on the integrity of the intestinal mucosa? If we had a better understanding of the mechanism responsible for the reduction in tight junction proteins, could we use an even more targeted approach by searching for agents that protect the integrity of the intestinal epithelium? These types of approaches could have broad impact on the ultimate impact of risk factors that alter intestinal permeability and could extend well beyond cardiovascular disease to the growing list of human conditions associated with alterations in the gut microbiome.The article by Santisteban et al2 adds important new data in support of the overall paradigm implicating the gut microbiome in cardiovascular disease. Indeed, the data suggest that as a result of increased gut permeability, a variety of substance produced by the intestinal microbiota will gain access to their human host and ultimately lead to hypertension and potentially some of the pathological consequences of the disease. A better understating of the pathological metabolites produced by the gut microbiota, defining the mechanisms responsible for the development of dysbiosis, and the molecular mechanisms linking increased sympathetic nerve activity to increased intestinal permeability are important next steps in gaining a better understanding of the fundamental causes of hypertension and insights into potential novel therapeutic strategies.Sources of FundingThis study was supported by National Institutes of Health PO1 HL095070.DisclosuresW. Robert Taylor has developed intellectual property related to devices used for fecal transplantation. The other author reports no conflicts.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to W. Robert Taylor, MD, PhD, Cardiology Division, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Cir, Suite 319 WMB, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail [email protected]References1. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis.Nat Med. 2013; 19:576–585. doi: 10.1038/nm.3145.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Santisteban MM, Qi Y, Zubcevic J, et al. Hypertension-linked pathophysiological alterations in the gut.Circ Res. 2017; 120:312–323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309006.LinkGoogle Scholar3. Afsar B, Vaziri ND, Aslan G, Tarim K, Kanbay M. Gut hormones and gut microbiota: implications for kidney function and hypertension.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016; 10:954–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.10.007.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Ohri SK, Somasundaram S, Koak Y, Macpherson A, Keogh BE, Taylor KM, Menzies IS, Bjarnason I. The effect of intestinal hypoperfusion on intestinal absorption and permeability during cardiopulmonary bypass.Gastroenterology. 1994; 106:318–323.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Leclercq S, Matamoros S, Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Jamar F, Stärkel P, Windey K, Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F, Verbeke K, de Timary P, Delzenne NM. Intestinal permeability, gut-bacterial dysbiosis, and behavioral markers of alcohol-dependence severity.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:E4485–E4493. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415174111.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity.Nat Rev Immunol. 2016; 16:341–352. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Wenzel U, Turner JE, Krebs C, Kurts C, Harrison DG, Ehmke H. Immune Mechanisms in Arterial Hypertension.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27:677–686. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015050562.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Niedermaier ON, Smith ML, Beightol LA, Zukowska-Grojec Z, Goldstein DS, Eckberg DL. Influence of cigarette smoking on human autonomic function.Circulation. 1993; 88:562–571.LinkGoogle Scholar9. Kvetnansky R, Lu X, Ziegler MG. Stress-triggered changes in peripheral catecholaminergic systems.Adv Pharmacol. 2013; 68:359–397. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411512-5.00017-8.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Wei J, Rooks C, Ramadan R, Shah AJ, Bremner JD, Quyyumi AA, Kutner M, Vaccarino V. Meta-analysis of mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia and subsequent cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol. 2014; 114:187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.022.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Yang PC, Jury J, Söderholm JD, Sherman PM, McKay DM, Perdue MH. Chronic psychological stress in rats induces intestinal sensitization to luminal antigens.Am J Pathol. 2006; 168:104–114; quiz 363. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050575.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R. Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.Hypertension. 2014; 64:897–903. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03469.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Chan L, Zhang Y, Kuang X, Koohi-Moghadam M, Wu H, Lam T, Chiou J and Wen C (2022) Captopril Alleviates Chondrocyte Senescence in DOCA-Salt Hypertensive Rats Associated with Gut Microbiome Alteration, Cells, 10.3390/cells11193173, 11:19, (3173) Walia N, Rao N, Garrett M, Yates K, Malone S and Holmes C (2022) Proton‐pump inhibitor use and the risk of peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis, Internal Medicine Journal, 10.1111/imj.15601 Dwaib H, AlZaim I, Ajouz G, Eid A and El-Yazbi A (2021) Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Impact of Early Metabolic Impairment: Interplay between Dysbiosis and Adipose Inflammation, Molecular Pharmacology, 10.1124/molpharm.121.000338, 102:1, (60-79), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022. Hanscom M, Loane D and Shea-Donohue T (2021) Brain-gut axis dysfunction in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 10.1172/JCI143777, 131:12, Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021., Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021. Edwards J, Roy S, Galla S, Tomcho J, Bearss N, Waigi E, Mell B, Cheng X, Saha P, Vijay-Kumar M, McCarthy C, Joe B and Wenceslau C (2021) FPR-1 (Formyl Peptide Receptor-1) Activation Promotes Spontaneous, Premature Hypertension in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats, Hypertension, 77:4, (1191-1202), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021. Li J, Yang X, Zhou X and Cai J (2021) The Role and Mechanism of Intestinal Flora in Blood Pressure Regulation and Hypertension Development, Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 10.1089/ars.2020.8104, 34:10, (811-830), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021. Chakraborty S, Mandal J, Yang T, Cheng X, Yeo J, McCarthy C, Wenceslau C, Koch L, Hill J, Vijay-Kumar M and Joe B (2020) Metabolites and Hypertension: Insights into Hypertension as a Metabolic Disorder, Hypertension, 75:6, (1386-1396), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Edwards J, Roy S, Tomcho J, Schreckenberger Z, Chakraborty S, Bearss N, Saha P, McCarthy C, Vijay-Kumar M, Joe B and Wenceslau C (2020) Microbiota are critical for vascular physiology: Germ-free status weakens contractility and induces sex-specific vascular remodeling in mice, Vascular Pharmacology, 10.1016/j.vph.2019.106633, 125-126, (106633), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020. Wang R, Tuerdi Z, Bi Y, Pan F, Zhang Z, Yang W and Duiyimuhan G (2020) Secondary Hypertension of Other Type Secondary Hypertension, 10.1007/978-981-15-0591-1_19, (683-748), . García-Ríos A, Camargo Garcia A, Perez-Jimenez F and Perez-Martinez P (2019) Microbiota intestinal: ¿un nuevo protagonista en el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular?, Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis, 10.1016/j.arteri.2018.11.003, 31:4, (178-185), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019. García-Ríos A, Camargo Garcia A, Perez-Jimenez F and Perez-Martinez P (2019) Gut microbiota: A new protagonist in the risk of cardiovascular disease?, Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition), 10.1016/j.artere.2018.11.004, 31:4, (178-185), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019. Liang S, Wu X and Jin F (2018) Gut-Brain Psychology: Rethinking Psychology From the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnint.2018.00033, 12 Carlström M, Lundberg J and Weitzberg E (2018) Mechanisms underlying blood pressure reduction by dietary inorganic nitrate, Acta Physiologica, 10.1111/apha.13080, 224:1, (e13080), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018. Honour J, Conway E, Hodkinson R and Lam F (2018) The evolution of methods for urinary steroid metabolomics in clinical investigations particularly in childhood, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.02.013, 181, (28-51), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Thiriet M (2018) Behavioral Risk Factors Vasculopathies, 10.1007/978-3-319-89315-0_6, (549-594), . Qi Y, Kim S, Richards E, Raizada M and Pepine C (2017) Gut Microbiota, Circulation Research, 120:11, (1724-1726), Online publication date: 26-May-2017. January 20, 2017Vol 120, Issue 2 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310339PMID: 28104760 Originally publishedJanuary 20, 2017 Keywordsinflammationdysbiosismicrobiomesympathetic nervous systemhypertensionEditorialsPDF download Advertisement