Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Targeted Proteomics and Absolute Protein Quantification for the Construction of a Stoichiometric Host-Pathogen Surface Density Model

2017; Elsevier BV; Volume: 16; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/mcp.m116.063966

ISSN

1535-9484

Autores

Kristoffer Sjöholm, Ola Kilsgård, Johan Teleman, Lotta Happonen, Lars Malmström, Johan Malmström,

Tópico(s)

Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Resumo

Sepsis is a systemic immune response responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Molecular modeling of host-pathogen interactions in the disease state represents a promising strategy to define molecular events of importance for the transition from superficial to invasive infectious diseases. Here we used the Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes as a model system to establish a mass spectrometry based workflow for the construction of a stoichiometric surface density model between the S. pyogenes surface, the surface virulence factor M-protein, and adhered human blood plasma proteins. The workflow relies on stable isotope labeled reference peptides and selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry analysis of a wild-type strain and an M-protein deficient mutant strain, to generate absolutely quantified protein stoichiometry ratios between S. pyogenes and interacting plasma proteins. The stoichiometry ratios in combination with a novel targeted mass spectrometry method to measure cell numbers enabled the construction of a stoichiometric surface density model using protein structures available from the protein data bank. The model outlines the topology and density of the host-pathogen protein interaction network on the S. pyogenes bacterial surface, revealing a dense and highly organized protein interaction network. Removal of the M-protein from S. pyogenes introduces a drastic change in the network topology, validated by electron microscopy. We propose that the stoichiometric surface density model of S. pyogenes in human blood plasma represents a scalable framework that can continuously be refined with the emergence of new results. Future integration of new results will improve the understanding of protein-protein interactions and their importance for bacterial virulence. Furthermore, we anticipate that the general properties of the developed workflow will facilitate the production of stoichiometric surface density models for other types of host-pathogen interactions. Sepsis is a systemic immune response responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Molecular modeling of host-pathogen interactions in the disease state represents a promising strategy to define molecular events of importance for the transition from superficial to invasive infectious diseases. Here we used the Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes as a model system to establish a mass spectrometry based workflow for the construction of a stoichiometric surface density model between the S. pyogenes surface, the surface virulence factor M-protein, and adhered human blood plasma proteins. The workflow relies on stable isotope labeled reference peptides and selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry analysis of a wild-type strain and an M-protein deficient mutant strain, to generate absolutely quantified protein stoichiometry ratios between S. pyogenes and interacting plasma proteins. The stoichiometry ratios in combination with a novel targeted mass spectrometry method to measure cell numbers enabled the construction of a stoichiometric surface density model using protein structures available from the protein data bank. The model outlines the topology and density of the host-pathogen protein interaction network on the S. pyogenes bacterial surface, revealing a dense and highly organized protein interaction network. Removal of the M-protein from S. pyogenes introduces a drastic change in the network topology, validated by electron microscopy. We propose that the stoichiometric surface density model of S. pyogenes in human blood plasma represents a scalable framework that can continuously be refined with the emergence of new results. Future integration of new results will improve the understanding of protein-protein interactions and their importance for bacterial virulence. Furthermore, we anticipate that the general properties of the developed workflow will facilitate the production of stoichiometric surface density models for other types of host-pathogen interactions. Bacterial infections present an important healthcare challenge with a wide spectrum of disease severity. One of the most severe bacterial diseases is sepsis, a systemic immune response mainly caused by bacteria entering the bloodstream (1.Martin G.S. Mannino D.M. Eaton S. Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 1546-1554Crossref PubMed Scopus (4823) Google Scholar). Sepsis is among the leading cause of deaths in hospitals (2.Alberti C. Brun-Buisson C. Goodman S.V. Guidici D. Granton J. Moreno R. Smithies M. Thomas O. Artigas A. Le Gall J.R. European Sepsis Group Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients.Am. J. Respiratory Crit. Care Med. 2003; 168: 77-84Crossref PubMed Scopus (205) Google Scholar, 3.Angus D.C. Linde-Zwirble W.T. Lidicker J. Clermont G. Carcillo J. Pinsky M.R. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: 1303-1310Crossref PubMed Scopus (6661) Google Scholar), with a mortality rate ranging from 20% to 50% (1.Martin G.S. Mannino D.M. Eaton S. Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 1546-1554Crossref PubMed Scopus (4823) Google Scholar, 4.Jawad I. Luksic I. Rafnsson S.B. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality.J. Glob. Health. 2012; 2 (010404)Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) and a worldwide incidence of 200 to 300 per 100,000 every year (4.Jawad I. Luksic I. Rafnsson S.B. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality.J. Glob. Health. 2012; 2 (010404)Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Furthermore, patients surviving sepsis have a drastic reduction in life quality and life expectancy (5.Davis J.S. He V. Anstey N.M. Condon J.R. Long term outcomes following hospital admission for sepsis using relative survival analysis: a prospective cohort study of 1,092 patients with 5 year follow up.PloS One. 2014; 9: e112224Crossref PubMed Scopus (33) Google Scholar, 6.Dick A. Liu H. Zwanziger J. Perencevich E. Furuya E.Y. Larson E. Pogorzelska-Maziarz M. Stone P.W. Long-term survival and healthcare utilization outcomes attributable to sepsis and pneumonia.BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012; 12: 432Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar, 7.Heyland D.K. Hopman W. Coo H. Tranmer J. McColl M.A. Long-term health-related quality of life in survivors of sepsis. Short Form 36: a valid and reliable measure of health-related quality of life.Crit. Care Med. 2000; 28: 3599-3605Crossref PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar), and in the United States alone, the cost associated with sepsis is 17 billion dollars (3.Angus D.C. Linde-Zwirble W.T. Lidicker J. Clermont G. Carcillo J. Pinsky M.R. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.Crit. Care Med. 2001; 29: 1303-1310Crossref PubMed Scopus (6661) Google Scholar). A growing concern in sepsis treatment is that even though the mortality rate of sepsis cases has been decreasing over the last decades, the total number of deaths is increasing (1.Martin G.S. Mannino D.M. Eaton S. Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 1546-1554Crossref PubMed Scopus (4823) Google Scholar, 8.Seymour C.W. Rea T.D. Kahn J.M. Walkey A.J. Yealy D.M. Angus D.C. Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome.Am. J. Respiratory Crit. Care Med. 2012; 186: 1264-1271Crossref PubMed Scopus (152) Google Scholar). In addition, antibiotic resistant bacteria constitute an increasing problem for the healthcare system (9.Davies J. Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010; 74: 417-433Crossref PubMed Scopus (3370) Google Scholar, 10.Hawkey P.M. Jones A.M. The changing epidemiology of resistance.The J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009; 64: Si3-Si10Crossref Scopus (568) Google Scholar, 11.de Kraker M.E. Jarlier V. Monen J.C. Heuer O.E. van de Sande N. Grundmann H. The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System.Clin. Microbiol. Infection. 2013; 19: 860-868Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (263) Google Scholar), making bacterial infections harder to treat. In the transition from superficial to severe disease, bacterial pathogens have devised a multitude of defense strategies. Some of these defense strategies include protein-protein interactions to prevent for example complement deposition, avoiding antibody binding and phagocytosis (12.Nordenfelt P. Waldemarson S. Linder A. Mörgelin M. Karlsson C. Malmström J. Björck L. Antibody orientation at bacterial surfaces is related to invasive infection.J. Exp. Med. 2012; 209: 2367-2381Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). The complex nature of the host-pathogen interaction network calls for new strategies to integrate and visualize these interactions at a molecular level preferably using systems wide analysis with as accurate measurements as possible. In particular, there is an unmet need to determine stoichiometric relationships between interacting proteins at the level of a biological system and visualize these interactions in an accurate model to support the development of new preventive, diagnostic and treatment strategies for severe infectious disease. The accurate analysis of host-pathogen interactions to determine the stoichiometric relationship between pathogen, surface proteins and interacting host proteins is an important step toward understanding bacterial immune evasion strategies. In the work presented here, we used the Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes as a model pathogen and human blood plasma as a model for interacting host proteins. S. pyogenes is one of the most important human pathogens responsible for a wide spectrum of superficial and severe diseases such as pharyngitis and sepsis (13.Carapetis J.R. Steer A.C. Mulholland E.K. Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases.Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005; 5: 685-694Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1960) Google Scholar). The bacteria have a well-characterized human blood plasma interaction proteome (14.Sjöholm K. Karlsson C. Linder A. Malmström J. A comprehensive analysis of the Streptococcus pyogenes and human plasma protein interaction network.Mol. bioSystems. 2014; 10: 1698-1708Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) of critical importance for the transition to invasive diseases. S. pyogenes is divided into serogroups based on the sequence variation of the most abundant and important surface bound virulence factor, the M-protein (15.Caparon M.G. Stephens D.S. Olsen A. Scott J.R. Role of M protein in adherence of group A streptococci.Infection Immunity. 1991; 59: 1811-1817Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). So far there are more than 200 different types of M-proteins identified (16.Cole J.N. Barnett T.C. Nizet V. Walker M.J. Molecular insight into invasive group A streptococcal disease.Nat. Rev. Microbiology. 2011; 9: 724-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (293) Google Scholar, 17.Beall B. Facklam R. Thompson T. Sequencing emm-specific PCR products for routine and accurate typing of group A streptococci.J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996; 34: 953-958Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), where the most common is the M1 serogroup for both pharyngitis and invasive S. pyogenes disease (18.Cunningham M.W. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections.Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000; 13: 470-511Crossref PubMed Scopus (1757) Google Scholar, 19.Steer A.C. Law I. Matatolu L. Beall B.W. Carapetis J.R. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development.Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009; 9: 611-616Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (383) Google Scholar). The M1-protein is a coiled-coil dimer of a 453 amino acid long protein, anchored in the bacterial cell wall (20.McNamara C. Zinkernagel A.S. Macheboeuf P. Cunningham M.W. Nizet V. Ghosh P. Coiled-coil irregularities and instabilities in group A Streptococcus M1 are required for virulence.Science. 2008; 319: 1405-1408Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar, 21.Macheboeuf P. Buffalo C. Fu C.Y. Zinkernagel A.S. Cole J.N. Johnson J.E. Nizet V. Ghosh P. Streptococcal M1 protein constructs a pathological host fibrinogen network.Nature. 2011; 472: 64-68Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar). The M1-protein has several known human plasma protein interactions, such as serum albumin (22.Malmström J. Karlsson C. Nordenfelt P. Ossola R. Weisser H. Quandt A. Hansson K. Aebersold R. Malmström L. Björck L. Streptococcus pyogenes in human plasma: adaptive mechanisms analyzed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics.J. Biol. Chem. 2012; 287: 1415-1425Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 23.Kronvall G. Simmons A. Myhre E.B. Jonsson S. Specific absorption of human serum albumin, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin G with selected strains of group A and G streptococci.Infection Immunity. 1979; 25: 1-10Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), fibrinogen (21.Macheboeuf P. Buffalo C. Fu C.Y. Zinkernagel A.S. Cole J.N. Johnson J.E. Nizet V. Ghosh P. Streptococcal M1 protein constructs a pathological host fibrinogen network.Nature. 2011; 472: 64-68Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, 24.Kantor F.S. Fibrinogen Precipitation by Streptococcal M Protein. I. Identity of the Reactants, and Stoichiometry of the Reaction.J. Exp. Med. 1965; 121: 849-859Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar, 25.Sanford B.A. Davison V.E. Ramsay M.A. Fibrinogen-mediated adherence of group A Streptococcus to influenza A virus-infected cell cultures.Infection Immunity. 1982; 38: 513-520Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) and immunoglobulin gamma (IgG) 1The abbreviations used are:IgGimmunoglobulin gammaLCliquid chromatographySRMselected reaction monitoringCFUcolony forming unitsMSMass spectrometry. 1The abbreviations used are:IgGimmunoglobulin gammaLCliquid chromatographySRMselected reaction monitoringCFUcolony forming unitsMSMass spectrometry. (12.Nordenfelt P. Waldemarson S. Linder A. Mörgelin M. Karlsson C. Malmström J. Björck L. Antibody orientation at bacterial surfaces is related to invasive infection.J. Exp. Med. 2012; 209: 2367-2381Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar, 23.Kronvall G. Simmons A. Myhre E.B. Jonsson S. Specific absorption of human serum albumin, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin G with selected strains of group A and G streptococci.Infection Immunity. 1979; 25: 1-10Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 26.Åkesson P. Schmidt K.H. Cooney J. Björck L. M1 protein and protein H: IgGFc- and albumin-binding streptococcal surface proteins encoded by adjacent genes.Biochem. J. 1994; 300: 877-886Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar). In combination with the cell wall and surface associated proteins of the bacterium, the interactions between pathogen and host give rise to a complex network of bacterial and host protein interactions. immunoglobulin gamma liquid chromatography selected reaction monitoring colony forming units Mass spectrometry. immunoglobulin gamma liquid chromatography selected reaction monitoring colony forming units Mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the method of choice when measuring the complex dynamics of pathogen surface proteins and their interactions with host proteins (14.Sjöholm K. Karlsson C. Linder A. Malmström J. A comprehensive analysis of the Streptococcus pyogenes and human plasma protein interaction network.Mol. bioSystems. 2014; 10: 1698-1708Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 22.Malmström J. Karlsson C. Nordenfelt P. Ossola R. Weisser H. Quandt A. Hansson K. Aebersold R. Malmström L. Björck L. Streptococcus pyogenes in human plasma: adaptive mechanisms analyzed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics.J. Biol. Chem. 2012; 287: 1415-1425Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 27.Karlsson C. Malmström L. Aebersold R. Malmström J. Proteome-wide selected reaction monitoring assays for the human pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes.Nat. Commun. 2012; 3: 1301Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar, 28.Wolf-Yadlin A. Hautaniemi S. Lauffenburger D.A. White F.M. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007; 104: 5860-5865Crossref PubMed Scopus (431) Google Scholar, 29.Picotti P. Bodenmiller B. Mueller L.N. Domon B. Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics.Cell. 2009; 138: 795-806Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (647) Google Scholar, 30.Anderson L. Hunter C.L. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2006; 5: 573-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1080) Google Scholar). In bottom-up MS based proteomics techniques, trypsin is usually used to digest proteins into peptides that are separated using liquid chromatography (LC) and coupled online for MS analysis (31.Aebersold R. Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Nature. 2003; 422: 198-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (5596) Google Scholar, 32.Yates J.R. Ruse C.I. Nakorchevsky A. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications.Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009; 11: 49-79Crossref PubMed Scopus (795) Google Scholar). In targeted MS techniques, such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM), transitions for selected proteotypic peptides are exclusively and reproducibly measured using triple quadruple mass spectrometers (33.Lange V. Picotti P. Domon B. Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008; 4: 222Crossref PubMed Scopus (1126) Google Scholar, 34.Picotti P. Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.Nat. Methods. 2012; 9: 555-566Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar). Together with stable isotope labeled peptides (29.Picotti P. Bodenmiller B. Mueller L.N. Domon B. Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics.Cell. 2009; 138: 795-806Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (647) Google Scholar, 35.Gerber S.A. Rush J. Stemman O. Kirschner M.W. Gygi S.P. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003; 100: 6940-6945Crossref PubMed Scopus (1546) Google Scholar, 36.Addona T.A. Abbatiello S.E. Schilling B. Skates S.J. Mani D.R. Bunk D.M. Spiegelman C.H. Zimmerman L.J. Ham A.J. Keshishian H. Hall S.C. Allen S. Blackman R.K. Borchers C.H. Buck C. Cardasis H.L. Cusack M.P. Dodder N.G. Gibson B.W. Held J.M. Hiltke T. Jackson A. Johansen E.B. Kinsinger C.R. Li J. Mesri M. Neubert T.A. Niles R.K. Pulsipher T.C. Ransohoff D. Rodriguez H. Rudnick P.A. Smith D. Tabb D.L. Tegeler T.J. Variyath A.M. Vega-Montoto L.J. Wahlander A. Waldemarson S. Wang M. Whiteaker J.R. Zhao L. Anderson N.L. Fisher S.J. Liebler D.C. Paulovich A.G. Regnier F.E. Tempst P. Carr S.A. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.Nat. Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 633-641Crossref PubMed Scopus (865) Google Scholar), SRM can provide absolute protein quantification for several proteins present in the same sample. The isotope-labeled peptides behave the same as the unlabeled peptides in LC-MS (35.Gerber S.A. Rush J. Stemman O. Kirschner M.W. Gygi S.P. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003; 100: 6940-6945Crossref PubMed Scopus (1546) Google Scholar), and because the labeled peptide is of known concentration, the unlabeled peptide concentration can be calculated and hence absolutely quantified. The protein concentration is then extrapolated from the concentration of the proteotypic peptides measured for that protein (37.Kuster B. Schirle M. Mallick P. Aebersold R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005; 6: 577-583Crossref PubMed Scopus (304) Google Scholar). In this article, we have performed a comprehensive study of the stoichiometric relationship between adhered host proteins and a bacterial surface. The stoichiometric relationship in combination with a new technical improvement for counting the number of bacteria using SRM enabled the construction of the first model of S. pyogenes surface interaction network in a host environment. This model includes the stoichiometric relations between host proteins, surface proteins, and the surface of the pathogen and it visualizes the density of this plethora of interactions in a stoichiometric surface density model. The S. pyogenes strains that were used for the construction of the stoichiometric density model are: SF370, a clinical isolate of the M1 serotype; and an isogenic M1-mutant of SF370, ΔM1 (38.Abbot E.L. Smith W.D. Siou G.P. Chiriboga C. Smith R.J. Wilson J.A. Hirst B.H. Kehoe M.A. Pili mediate specific adhesion of Streptococcus pyogenes to human tonsil and skin.Cell. Microbiol. 2007; 9: 1822-1833Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar). Strains used for cell counting of S. pyogenes are: JM50, JM57, JM59, JM62, JM67, JM72, JM81, and JM85 are all of the M1 serotype and isolated from healthcare clinics in Sweden during 2012 (39.Malmstrom L. Bakochi A. Svensson G. Kilsgard O. Lantz H. Petersson A.C. Hauri S. Karlsson C. Malmstrom J. Quantitative proteogenomics of human pathogens using DIA-MS.J. Proteomics. 2015; 129: 98-107Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). Single colonies were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to exponential and stationary phase (only the strains used for cell counting) in 30g/L Todd-Hewitt broth (BD, Sparks, MD) and 6g/L yeast extract (BD). The cells were then harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 20 mm Tris-HCl, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.6 (TBS tablet, Medicago, Uppsala, Sweden), to an approximate concentration of 2 × 109 CFU/ml. Four commonly used methods for counting bacteria, optical density, colony forming units (CFU), microscopy and flow cytometry, were evaluated. The first two methods are simple well-established methods of estimating cell count in a dilution series, optical density at 620 nm and counting the number of colonies (CFU) on an agar plate after 24-hour incubation. The third method, light field microscopy with phase contrast was performed using an Olympus CKX41 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an INFINITY1 camera (Lumenera Corporation, Ottawa, ON, Canada), together with a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber and tryphan blue staining (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Microscopy images were analyzed automatically using a custom Adobe Photoshop CS6 procedure, in which the area of the dark bacteria is calculated in a selected area of the counting chamber, after removing the counting chamber reference lines. The method has an estimated Pearson's product-moment correlation of 0.989 (p < 3e-11), compared with manual counting. The fourth method, flow cytometry was performed using a BD Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer with a 488 nm filter, gating in FL1-A (488 nm) versus FSC-A, with a flow rate of 35 μl/min and a core size of 16 μm. Samples were stained using a fluorescent dye (SYTO™ BC, Thermo Fisher). Samples were collected until 30 μl or 30000 bacterial events. The bacterial population in FSC-A/FL1-A was moved toward higher FL1-A in the more concentrated dilutions. This higher dye absorbance could indicate aggregated bacteria, but no compensation was made for this. Human blood plasma (pooled healthy human plasma [Na-citrate], Innovative Research, Novi, MI) was mixed with bacteria, in a ratio 3:1, and the samples were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C, allowing plasma proteins to adsorb to the bacterial surface. This bacterial to plasma ratio is 10 times lower than the original plasma adsorption protocols (40.Janulczyk R. Iannelli F. Sjoholm A.G. Pozzi G. Bjorck L. Hic, a novel surface protein of Streptococcus pneumoniae that interferes with complement function.J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 37257-37263Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (178) Google Scholar, 41.Pandiripally V. Gregory E. Cue D. Acquisition of regulators of complement activation by Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M1.Infection Immunity. 2002; 70: 6206-6214Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar), but because the detection techniques have improved and to better replicate the disease state, the bacterial ratio was kept as low as possible. Bacteria were harvested after several washes in 20 mm Tris-HCl, 150 mm NaCl, and pH 7.6 through centrifugation (5000 × g). All samples were prepared in eight biological replicates. To elute the adsorbed proteins, the final cell pellets were prepared using two protocols. The first, glycine elution, has been described (12.Nordenfelt P. Waldemarson S. Linder A. Mörgelin M. Karlsson C. Malmström J. Björck L. Antibody orientation at bacterial surfaces is related to invasive infection.J. Exp. Med. 2012; 209: 2367-2381Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). Briefly, the bacterial pellet was resuspended in 0.1 m glycine (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 2.0, followed by incubation for 10 min, and the supernatants were neutralized to pH 7–8 with 1 m Tris (Ultrapure, Saveen Werner AB, Limhamn, Sweden). In the second protocol, bacteria digest, the pellet was resuspended in water (HPLC-graded, Sigma-Aldrich) and transferred to tube containing 0.1 mm Silica beads (Lysing Matrix tubes, Nordic Biolabs #6911100, Täby, Sweden). The bacteria were lysed with a cell disruptor (FastPrep96, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA). The in solution digestion (see below) was performed without transferring the liquid to new tube to minimize sample loss and enhance surface protein yield. Samples were dried completely through vacuum evaporation (miVac Duo, Genevac, Ipswich, UK) and resuspended in 8 m urea (Sigma-Aldrich) to denature the sample. The protein sample was reduced using tris (2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine (Sigma-Aldrich), at a final concentration of 10 mm and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. The samples were incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature with 2-iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 20 mm as the alkylating agent. Samples were diluted with 100 mm ammonium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich) to a urea concentration of 0.73 m and digested with a final concentration of 3.6 ng/μl trypsin (Sequence grade modified trypsin Porcin, Promega, Madison, WI) over night (18 h). The reaction was stopped by adding formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) to a final sample pH of 2–3. Vydac UltraMicroSpin® silica C18 300Å columns (#SUM SS18V, The Nest Group, Inc., Southborough, MA) was used for sample desalting, clean-up and concentrating peptides according to the manufacturer's instructions. To remove silica beads and cell debris, the samples prepared by bacteria digest were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min, and supernatant was used for C18 peptide clean-up. Chromatographic separations of peptides were performed on an Easy-nLC II system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) with a nonlinear 30-min gradient of 5–10% acetonitrile (ACN, with 0.1% formic acid, UHPLC-graded, Fluka Analytical, Sigma-Aldrich) over 5 min, 10–20% ACN over 20 min, and 20–30% ACN over 5 min, using 15 cm 3 μm columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The SRM measurements were performed on a TSQ Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nano electrospray ion source (EASY-spray, Thermo Fisher Scientific). TSQ global parameters were: polarity: positive; spray voltage: 2000V; and transfer tube temperature: 325 °C. TSQ scan parameters were: quadrupole resolution: 0.7 FWHM in both Q1 and Q3; cycle time: 1.7 s; CID gas (argon) 2mTorr; source fragmentation: 10V; Chrom filter: 3 s; and 788 transitions were measured simultaneously. The 788 transition consist of 76 peptides, using 4–6 assays per peptide, with a complementary labeled peptide making up a total of 768 transitions and with 20 additional transitions for retention time calibration peptides. The human proteins monitored by SRM are based on previous publications (14.Sjöholm K. Karlsson C. Linder A. Malmström J. A comprehensive analysis of the Streptococcus pyogenes and human plasma protein interaction network.Mol. bioSystems. 2014; 10: 1698-1708Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). A full list of proteins, peptides, transitions selected for monitoring, charge, and collision energy is listed in supplemental Table S1. Peptides selected for targeted analysis was selected for the enriched binding, shown in a previous investigation (14.Sjöholm K. Karlsson C. Linder A. Malmström J. A comprehensive analysis of the Streptococcus pyogenes and human plasma protein interaction network.Mol. bioSystems. 2014; 10: 1698-1708Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), to the surface of S. pyogenes. Stable isotope labeled peptides (SpikeTides, JPT, Berlin, Germany; and AQUA QuantPro, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for absolute quantification of peptides. The linear range of the isotope labeled peptides were determined including the detection limit and the coefficient of determination (R2), listed in supplemental Table S1. The R2 was calculated between the log10 intensity and log10 peptide concentration. The log10 transform was used because of the large concentration range of the analyzed peptides, which would otherwise cause the correlation to be dominated by the high concentration peptides. The maximum measured value was 1 pmol/injection, which is wi

Referência(s)