Artigo Revisado por pares

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 for resectable and borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A prospective, multi-institutional, phase II trial.

2014; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 32; Issue: 3_suppl Linguagem: Inglês

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.283

ISSN

1527-7755

Autores

Masamichi Mizuma, Fuyuhiko Motoi, Kazuyuki Ishida, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Shigeru Ottomo, Masaya Oikawa, Takaho Okada, Hiromune Shimamura, Shinichi Takemura, Fuminori Ono, Masanori Akada, Kei Nakagawa, Yu Katayose, Shinichi Egawa, Michiaki Unno,

Tópico(s)

Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Resumo

283 Background: Although surgical resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), recurrence rates are very high even if complete resection is performed. Accordingly, a new therapeutic strategy against PDAC is needed. Combination with gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) as first line chemotherapy is promising. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of GS for resectable and borderline PDAC in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: This study is a prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II trial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1(NAC-GS) for resectable and borderline PDAC was performed as follows. Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 1,000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m 2 twice daily for the first 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest. Each cycle was repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate. Secondary endpoints were feasibility, resection rate, pathological effect, recurrence-free survival and tumor marker status. Results: 36 patients were enrolled between 2008 and 2010. 35 were eligible for participation in this trial. The most common toxicity was neutropenia in response to 90% of the relative dose intensity. Radiological tumor shrinkage and decreases of CA19-9 levels were seen in 69% and 89%, respectively. R0 resection rate was 87%, and the morbidity rate (40%) was acceptable. The 2-year survival rate of the total cohort was 45.7%. Patients undergoing surgical resection without distant metastases after NAC-GS (n=27) showed an increased median overall survival (34.7 months), compared with 10.0 months for resection with distant metastases or non-resection (p=0.0017). Conclusions: NAC-GS is safe and well tolerated in a multi-institutional setting. NAC-GS is encouraging patients with resectable and borderline PDAC because of better outcomes. Clinical trial information: UMIN-000001504.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX