Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons
2017; Elsevier BV; Volume: 24; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.013
ISSN1460-9584
AutoresRuben Zwiers, Hanneke Weel, Wouter H. Mallee, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, C. Niek van Dijk, Acácio Ramos, Adam Ajis, Alar Toom, Alessandro Ortolani, Alessandro Russo, Ali Abdelwahab, Alireza Yazdani, Allan David Mora, Alon Burg, Álvaro Colino, Ameur Iouail, Ana Rita Gaspar, André Luís Rocha de Souza, Andreas Engvall, Andrew R. Hsu, Andri Primadhi, Angélica Millán, Anil Peters, Anish K. Amin, Antonin Hoffmann, António José Correia Moreira, Antonio Marmotti, Ari Bertz, Arshad Barmare, Ayman Youseef Eltabbaa, Ben Rudge, Ben Schmidt, Caio Nery, Carlos R. Cortes, Carolina Lins, Cesar Andarcia Banuelos, Chegini Kord, Christiaan J. A. van Bergen, Christina Stukenborg‐Colsman, Ping Lu, Christopher Marquis, Daniel Baumfeld, Daniël Haverkamp, Daniel Mendes, Dave Townshend, David Kim, Derek Howard Park, Devendra Mahadevan, Diederik O. Verbeek, Dimitrios Hatziemmanuil, Dimitrios Nikolopoulos, Dimitrios Tsoukas, Eduardo Muller Ávila, Elena Manuela Samaila, Emre Baca, Enrique José Gargallo Verge, Enrique Leonardo C. Pasion, Erkal Bilgiç, Ernesto Arroyo, Ernesto Pereira, Ewe Juan Yeap, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Fabrizio Cortese, Ferdinand Krappel, Fernando Martínez, Fernando Peña, Francesco Lijoi, Gaston Daguerre, George Sulkers, Gergely Pánics, Morteza Naderi, Giovanni Carcuro, Gonçalo Martinho, Gonzalo Manuel Perez Herrera, Grzegorz Hajduk, Guilherme Carpeggiani, G. Nandhara, Gurgen Bakhtamyan, Guy Friedman, Gythe H. Bulstra, Harish Kurup, Héctor Masaragian, Henryk Liszka, H. Shalaby, Horea Benea, Iain Bissell, Ichiro Yoshimura, Igor Frangež, Ioannis Spanos, Ivan Bojanić, Ivica Medenica, Jaafar Abdeloihab, Jakob Fay, James Davenport, James R. McWilliam, James Walsh, Jeffrey D. Seybold, J. Carmichael, João Vide, Job N. Doornberg, Jorge Batista, Joris De Vos, J.R. Lansdaal, José de Arimathéa Brandão, Josep Ma Ustrell Torrent, Kailash Devalia, Karl-Heinz Kristen, Kowshik Jain, Laura Pintus, Laurens W. van der Plaat, Lior Laver, Luca La Verde, Luciano Keiserman, Luis A. Gómez-Carlín, Luis Pérez Carro, M.C. Castro Álvarez, М. Л. Головаха, Manabendra Nath Basu Mallick, Manuel Sousa, Margherita Germano, Martin Schulz, Mauro César Mattos e Dinato, Max van den Bogaert, Michaël P. A. Bus, Michel P. J. van den Bekerom, Miguel Viana Pereira Filho, Mikko Aulamo, Modest Orduña-Moncusí, Mohammad Hossein Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad Hossein Mohammad Hossein, Mohan Kumar, Nelson Pelozo Gomes Júnior, N. Moreno, Nicolas Graveleau, Nicolò Martinelli, Nikolaos E. Koukoulias, Nikolay M. Filipov, Niv Dreiangel, N. M. Fonseca Ferreira, Olusegun Aiyenuro, Onur Bilge, Oscar Castro-Aragon, Paolo Ceccarini, Paolo Sicchiero, Peter A. J. de Leeuw, Peter Hemmingsson, Pietro Spennacchio, Piotr Żbikowski, Qerim Kida, Rajeev Vohra, Reinhard Schuh, Rhys H. Thomas, Ricardo Issaka, Richard Freihaut, Richard Walter, Michele Risi, Roberto Zambelli, R.L. Maxwell, Rogier M. Gerards, Samer El Hage, Samuel B. Adams, Sandeep Kapoor, Sandra Catalán, Semin Becirbegovc, Shafic Said Al-Nammari, Stefaan Verfaillie, Steffen Schröter, Sung Ki Park, Suresh Chandrashekar, Tero Yli-Kyyny, Thierry G. Guitton, Thomas W. Barwick, Thomas Lakkos, Thomas Paulick, Thomas S. Roukis, Titi Marian Bajenescu, Tze-Choong Low, Valeria Lopez Astegiano, Vaso Kecojević, Vinay Parashar, Vish Kumar, Vishal Upadhyay, Vitalijs Pasters, Vitor Almeida Ribeiro de Miranda, Vladan Stevanović, Vytautas Kimtys, Gang Wu, Yuri Postnov,
Tópico(s)Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
ResumoThere is an increasing interest in the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, there is a large variety of PROMs and a lack of consensus regarding preference for their use. Aim of this study is to determine how often PROMS are used for foot and ankle disorders, for what purpose PROMs are used, and what the preferences of the foot and ankle surgeons are, when choosing a PROM to use. Members of the Ankleplatform Study Group—Science of Variation Collaborative were invited to participate in this survey by email. The online survey consisted of six questions on the use and preferences regarding foot and ankle PROMs. 188 participants completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents 17% reported not to use PROMs, 72% stated to use PROMS for research, 39% routinely for patient care and 34% for registration or quality assessment. The respondents were familiar with 30 different outcome measures, of which 20 were PROMs. One of the excluded outcome measures, the AOFAS Hindfoot scale was most commonly reported as preferred outcome measure. FAOS and MOXFQ were the preferred PROMs, reported by 9.7% of the surgeons. Subsequently followed by the FFI (4.3%), the FAAM (3.7%) and the VAS-FA (3.7%). A large majority of the foot and ankle surgeons uses PROMs. The AOFAS hindfoot scale is mentioned as the most preferred outcome measure, while in fact this is not a PROM. Of the twenty different PROMs mentioned in this study, most reported were the FAOS and MOXFQ both supported by only 9.7% of the surgeons. For proper comparison between patients in clinical practice and research, consensus is needed on which easy-to-use PROM with adequate clinimetric properties should be used. Therefore more evidence in the field of clinimetrics of foot and ankle outcome measures is needed.
Referência(s)