Artigo Revisado por pares

Identification of potentially invasive freshwater fishes, including translocated species, in Turkey using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK)

2017; Wiley; Volume: 102; Issue: 1-2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/iroh.201601877

ISSN

1522-2632

Autores

Ali Serhan Tarkan, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Nildeniz Top, Fitnat Güler Ekmekçı, Paul Stebbing, Gordon H. Copp,

Tópico(s)

Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior

Resumo

International Review of HydrobiologyVolume 102, Issue 1-2 p. 47-56 RESEARCH PAPER Identification of potentially invasive freshwater fishes, including translocated species, in Turkey using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK) Ali Serhan Tarkan, Corresponding Author Ali Serhan Tarkan serhantarkan@gmail.com Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, 48000 Turkey Correspondence Prof. Ali Serhan Tarkan, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla 48000, Turkey. Email: serhantarkan@gmail.com Handling Editor: Björn GückerSearch for more papers by this authorLorenzo Vilizzi, Lorenzo Vilizzi Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, 12/16 Banacha Str. 90-237 Łódź, PolandSearch for more papers by this authorNildeniz Top, Nildeniz Top Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, 48000 TurkeySearch for more papers by this authorFitnat Güler Ekmekçi, Fitnat Güler Ekmekçi Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeySearch for more papers by this authorPaul D. Stebbing, Paul D. Stebbing Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, DT4 0AB, Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset, EnglandSearch for more papers by this authorGordon H. Copp, Gordon H. Copp Salmon and Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 OHT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, United Kingdom Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author Ali Serhan Tarkan, Corresponding Author Ali Serhan Tarkan serhantarkan@gmail.com Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, 48000 Turkey Correspondence Prof. Ali Serhan Tarkan, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla 48000, Turkey. Email: serhantarkan@gmail.com Handling Editor: Björn GückerSearch for more papers by this authorLorenzo Vilizzi, Lorenzo Vilizzi Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, 12/16 Banacha Str. 90-237 Łódź, PolandSearch for more papers by this authorNildeniz Top, Nildeniz Top Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, 48000 TurkeySearch for more papers by this authorFitnat Güler Ekmekçi, Fitnat Güler Ekmekçi Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeySearch for more papers by this authorPaul D. Stebbing, Paul D. Stebbing Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, DT4 0AB, Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset, EnglandSearch for more papers by this authorGordon H. Copp, Gordon H. Copp Salmon and Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 OHT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, United Kingdom Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 10 April 2017 https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201601877Citations: 33Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Screening tools are being increasingly used to identify more effectively non-native species that pose an elevated risk of being invasive. Of the available decision-support tools, the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) has been widely used, but has recently been replaced by a generic screening tool, the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK), which is applicable to any aquatic species and complies with the minimum requirements for risk tools under the new EC alien invasive species Regulation. With its unique zoogeography and rich native fauna, Turkey is highly susceptible to non-native species' introductions and translocations. In order to inform non-native species policy and management regarding fishes in Turkey, AS-ISK was used to re-assess species previously screened using FISK and to assess additional non-native and translocated fish species. In this first calibration study of AS-ISK for Turkey, a basic score threshold of 28 was achieved, which reliably distinguished between potentially invasive (high risk) and potentially non-invasive (medium to low risk) fishes. Of the 64 species assessed, only one was ranked as 'low risk', 40 were categorised as 'medium risk', and the remaining 23 as 'high risk' of which five were translocated. Non-native species currently not present in Turkey, but that pose a high risk of being invasive, were Ameiurus melas, Ameiurus nebulosus, Hemiculter leucisculus, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Micropterus salmoides, Perccottus glenii, Pimephales promelas; whereas, the highest scoring translocated species were Cyprinus carpio, Esox lucius and Silurus glanis. When the potential effects of climate change on the assessments were considered, risk scores increased for some (sub)tropical fishes of which two are translocated species. Citing Literature Volume102, Issue1-2May 2017Pages 47-56 RelatedInformation

Referência(s)