Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Artigo Acesso aberto Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2017; Sociedade Brasileira Para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia; Volume: 32; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1590/s0102-865020170060000008

1678-2674

Júverson Alves Terra Júnior, Guilherme Azevedo Terra, Marisa de Carvalho Borges, Tharsus Dias Takeuti, Luciana Garcia Pereira Castro, Simone Souza Lima, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho Fernandes, Alex Augusto da Silva, Eduardo Crema,

Hernia repair and management

Purpose: To evaluate postoperative pain in patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four ports versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with only one port. Methods: Twenty-one patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 19 other patients in the single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. A VAS was used for the assessment of postoperative pain at three time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Results: Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference in VAS scores between the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups at any of the time points studied. Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups.