Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non‐target arthropods
2015; Wiley; Volume: 13; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3996
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Insect Pest Control Strategies
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 13, Issue 2 3996 OpinionOpen Access Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non-target arthropods EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)Search for more papers by this author EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 February 2015 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3996Citations: 26 Panel members: Alf Aagaard, Theo Brock, Ettore Capri, Sabine Duquesne, Metka Filipic, Antonio F. Hernandez-Jerez, Karen I. Hirsch-Ernst, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein, Thomas Kuhl, Ryszard Laskowski, Matthias Liess, Alberto Mantovani, Colin Ockleford, Bernadette Ossendorp, Daniel Pickford (until 30 June 2014), Robert Smith, Paulo Sousa, Ingvar Sundh, Aaldrik Tiktak and Ton Van Der Linden. Correspondence: [email protected] Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Non-target arthropod and In-Soil risk assessment: Peter Craig, Frank de Jong, Michael Klein, Ryszard Laskowski, Ton van der Linden, Barbara Manachini, Silvia Pieper, Robert Smith, Paulo Sousa, Klaus Swarowsky, Aaldrik Tiktak and Christopher John Topping for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion, and EFSA staff Franz Streissl for the support provided to this scientific opinion. Adoption date: 19 December 2014 Published date: 12 February 2015 Question number: EFSA-Q-2011-00975 On request from: EFSA AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract Following a request from the European Food Safety Authority, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for non-target arthropods. The current risk assessment scheme is reviewed, taking into consideration recent workshops and progress in science. Proposals are made for specific protection goals which aim to protect important ecosystem services such as food web support, pest control and biodiversity. In order to address recovery and source–sink population dynamics, conducting a landscape-level risk assessment is suggested. A new risk assessment scheme is suggested which integrates modelling approaches. The main exposure routes for non-target arthropods are identified and proposals are made on how to integrate them in the risk assessment. The appropriateness of the currently used vegetation distribution factor was investigated. It is proposed that new tests be included in order to address exposure via oral uptake of residues and uncertainties related to differences in species sensitivity. References Abbott WS, 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18, 265– 267. Abraham L and Vas J, 1999. Preliminary report on study of the daily activity pattern of neuroptera in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungaric. 34, 153– 164. Aldenberg T and Jaworska JS, 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 46, 1– 18. Aldershof S and Bakker F, 2010. Comparison of Arthropod Community Responses to an Insecticidal Active in Different Geographic Regions. In: ESCORT 3, 2010. A Alix, F Bakker, K Barrett, CA Brühl, M Coulson, S Hoy, JP Jansen, P Jepson, G Lewis, P Neumann, D Süßenbach and P Van Vliet (Eds), 2012. ESCORT 3 – linking non-target arthropod testing and risk assessment with protection goals. CRC SETAC Press, 1– 151. Altieri MA, 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74, 19– 31. Ardestani MM and Gestel CAM. van, 2013. Toxicodynamics of copper and cadmium in Folsomia candida exposed to simulated soil solutions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 32, 2746– 2754. Bakker F, Grove A, Blumel S, Calis J and Oomen P, 1992. Side-effect tests for phytoseiids and their rearing methods. Bulletin OILB/SROP, 15, 61– 81. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D and Schmid B, 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9, 1146– 1156. Barnthouse LW, 2004. Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23, 500– 508. Barrett KL, Grandy N, Harrison EG, Hassan S and Oomen PA, 1994. Guidance document on regulatory testing procedures for pesticides with non-target arthropods. Report of the SETAC/ESCORT Workshop 51. Wageningen, the Netherlands, and SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium. Begon M, Townsend CR and Harper JL, 2006. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4th edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 752 pp. Benton TG, Vickery J and Wilson JD, 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 182– 188. Bianchi FJJA, Van Wingerden WKRE, Griffioen AJ, Van der Veen M, Van der Straten MJJ, Wegman RMA and Meeuwsen HAM, 2005. Landscape factors affecting the control of Mamestra brassicae by natural enemies in brussels sprout. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 107, 145– 150. Bianchi F, Booij CJH and Tscharntke T, 2006. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 273, 1715– 1727. Bianchi FJJA, Ives AR, Schellhorn NA. 2013. Interactions between conventional and organic farming for biocontrol services across the landscape. Ecol. Appl. 23: 1531– 43. Bilde T and Topping C, 2004. Life history traits interact with landscape composition to influence population dynamics of a terrestrial arthropod: A simulation study. Ecoscience, 11, 64– 73. Blitzer EJ, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Klein A-M, Rand TA and Tscharntke T, 2012. Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 146, 34– 43. Boatman ND, Brickle NW, Hart JD, Milsom TP, Morris AJ, Murray AW, Murray K and Robertson P, 2004. Evidence for the indirect effects of pesticides on farmland birds. Ibis, 146, 131– 143. Boesten JJTI, Köpp H, Adriaanse PI, Brock TCM and Forbes VE, 2007. Conceptual model for improving the link between exposure and effects in the aquatic risk assessment of pesticides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 66, 291– 308. Blümel S, Bakker FM, Baier B, Brown K, Candolfi MP, Gossmann A, Grimm C, Jäckel B, Nienstedt K, Schirra KJ, Ufer A and Waltersdorfer A, 2000a. Laboratory residual contact test with the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for regulatory testing of plant protection products. In: Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods. Eds MP Candolfi, S Blümel, R Forster, FM Bakker, C Grimm, SA Hassan, U Heimbach, M Mead-Briggs, B Reber, R Schmuck and H. Vogt IOBC, BART and EPPO Joint Initiative, IOBC/WPRS, Gent, Belgium, 128– 150. Blümel S, Aldershof S, Bakker FM, Baier B, Boller E, Brown K, Bylemans D, Candolfi MP, Huber B, Linder C, Louis F, Müther J, Nienstedt KM, Oberwalder C, Reber B, Schirra KJ, Sterk G, Ufer A and Vogt H, 2000b. Guidance document to detect side effects of plant protection products on predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under field conditions: vineyards and orchards. In: Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods. Eds MP Candolfi, S Blümel, R Forster, FM Bakker, C Grimm, SA Hassan, U Heimbach, M Mead-Briggs, B Reber, R Schmuck and H. Vogt IOBC, BART and EPPO Joint Initiative, IOBC/WPRS, Gent, Belgium, 145– 158. Brickle N and Harper D, 2000. Effects of agricultural intensification on the breeding success of corn buntings Miliaria calandra. Journal of Animal Ecology, 37, 742– 755. Braden H, 1985. Ein Energiehaushalts- und Verdunstugsmodell für Wasser und Stofhaushaltsuntersuchungen landwirtschaftlich genutzter Einzugsgebiete. Mitteilungen Deutsche Bodenkundliche Geselschaft 42, 294– 299. Brock TCM and Budde BJ, 1994. On the choice of structural parameters to indicate responses of freshwater ecosystems to pesticide stress. In: IA Hill, F Heimbach, P Leeuwangh, P Matthiesen (Eds), Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Asses$sment of Chemicals Lewis Publishers, Michigan, 1956. Brown K, Tomlinson J, Duncan J and Hinchcliffe A, 2009. Critical comparison of available and potential higher tier testing approaches for the risk assessment of plant protection products, considering at least field and semi-field experimental designs, extrapolation from dose–response relationship, and increased dosages (aquatic and terrestrial). Literature reviews on ecotoxicology of chemicals with special focus on plant protection products. CFT/EFSA/PPR/2008/01. Exponent, UK, 192 pp. Bruck DJ and Lewis LC, 1998. Influence of adjacent cornfield habitat, trap location, and trap height on capture numbers of predators and a parasitoid of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in central Iowa. Environmental Entomology, 27, 1557– 1562. Brühl CA, Neumann P, Aldershof S, Bohan D, Brown K, Candolfi M, Geiger F, Kovalkovicová N, Kula C, Nienstedt K, Pestanudo S, Roembke J, Schmidt T, Topping CJ and Van Vliet P, 2012. Recovery. In: ESCORT 3: Linking non-target arthropod testing and risk assessment with protection goals. Eds A Alix, F Bakker, K Barrett, CA Brühl, M Coulson, S Hoy, J Jansen, P Jepson, G Lewis, P Neumann, D Süssenbach, P Van Vliet, eds. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 39– 41. Brühl CA, Alscher A, Berger G, Bethwell C, Graef F, Hahn M, Schmidt T and Weber B, 2013. Protection of biodiversity in the risk assessment and risk management of pesticides with a focus on arthropods, soil organisms, and amphibians. Report of the Research and Development Project Nr 3709 65 421. German Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt), 244 pp. Bryant DM, 1975. Breeding biology of house martins Delichon urbica in relation to aerial insect abundance. Ibis, 117, 180– 216. Buijs AE, Pedroli B and Luginbühl, 2006. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape and Ecology, 21, 375– 389. Bundschuh R, Schmitz J, Bundschuh M and Brühl CA, 2012. Does drift of insecticide adversely affect grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Saltatoria) in field margins? A case study combining laboratory acute toxicity with field monitoring data. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1874– 1879. Cãgan L, Turlings T, Bokor P and Dorn S, 1999. Lydella thompsoni Herting (Dipt., Tachinidae), a parasitoid of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. (Lep., Pyralidae) in Slovakia, Czech Republic and south-western Poland. Journal of Applied Entomology, 123, 577– 583. Calderone NW, 2012. Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and us agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992–2009. PLOS ONE 7(5), e37235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037235. Campbell PJ, Brown KC, Harrison EG, Bakker F, Barrett KL, Candolfi MP, Canez V, Dinter A, Lewis G, Mead-Briggs M, Miles M, Neumann P, Romijn K, Schmuck R, Shires S, Ufer A and Waltersdorfer A, 2000. A hazard quotient approach for assessing the risk to non-target arthropods from plant protection products under 91/414/EEC: hazard quotient trigger value proposal and validation, Journal of Pest Science, 73, 117– 124. Candolfi MP, Bakker F, Canez V, Miles M, Neumann Ch, Pilling E, Primiani M, Romijn K, Schmuck R, Storck-Weyhermuller S, Ufer A and Waltersdorfer A, 1999. Sensitivity of non-target arthropods to plant protection products: could Typhlodromus pyri and Aphidius spp. be used as indicator species? Chemosphere, 39, 1357– 1370. Candolfi MP, Blümel S, Forster R, Bakker FM, Grimm C, Hassan SA, Heimbach U, Mead-Briggs M, Reber B, Schmuck R and Vogt H, 2000a. Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods. IOBC, BART and EPPO Joint Initiative, IOBC/WPRS, Gent Belgium, 158 pp. Candolfi M, Bigler F, Campbell P, Heimbach U, Schmuck R, Angeli G, Bakker F, Brown K, Carli G, Dinter A, Forti D, Forster R, Gathmann A, Hassan S, Mead-Briggs M, Melandri M, Neumann P, Pasqualini E, Powell W, Reboulet J-N, Romijn K, Sechser B, Thieme T, Ufer A, Vergnet C and Vogt H, 2000b. Principles for regulatory testing and interpretation of semi-field and field studies with non-target arthropods. Journal of Pest Science, 73, 141– 147. Candolfi MP, Barrett KL, Campbell P, Forster R, Grandy N, Huet M-C, Lewis G, Oomen PA, Schmuck R and Vogt H, 2001. Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods. Report of the SETAC/ESCORT 2 Workshop, Wageningen, the Netherlands, and SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, A. Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS and Naeem S, 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59– 67. doi:10.1038/nature11148. Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F and Plantureux S, 2005. Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 25, 1– 15. Clough Y, Holzschuh A, Gabriel D, Purtauf T, Kleijn D, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I and Tscharntke T, 2007. Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 804– 812. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x. WW Collins and CO Qualset (Eds), 1999. Biodiversity in agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 334 pp. Cooke R, 2010. Conundrums with uncertainty factors (with discussion). Risk Analysis, 30, 330– 338. Coombes DS and Sotherton NW, 1986. The dispersal and distribution of polyphagous predatory Coleoptera in cereals. Annals of Applied Biology, 8, 461– 474. Corbett A and Rosenheim JA, 1996. Impact of a natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecological Entomology 21, 155– 164. Craig PS, Hickey GL, Luttik R and Hart A, 2012. Species non-exchangeability in probabilistic ecotoxicological risk assessment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 175, 243– 262. Cronin, JT, 2003 Patch structure, oviposition behaviour, and the distribution of parasitism risk. Ecological Monographs, 73, 283– 300. Dalkvist T, Topping CJ and Forbes VE, 2009. Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 1663– 1672. Dalkvist T, Sibly R and Topping C, 2013. Landscape structure mediates the effects of a stressor on field vole populations. Landscape Ecology, 28 (10), 1– 14. De Groot RS, Wilson MA and Boumans RMJ, 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Special Issue: The dynamics and value of ecosystem services: integrating economic and ecological perspectives. Ecological Economics, 41, 393– 408. De Jong FMW, Bakker FM, Brown K, Jilesen CJTJ, Posthuma-Doodeman CJAM, Smit CE, Van der Steen JJM and Van Eekelen GMA. 2010. Guidance for summarising and evaluating field studies with non-target arthropods. RIVM report 601712006. RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, 73 pp. De Ruiter PC, Wolters V, Moore JC and Winemiller KO, 2005. Food web ecology: playing Jenga and beyond. Science, 309, 68– 71. doi: 10.1126/science.1096112. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2001. Assessing the validity of current approaches for calculating off-crop exposure to pesticides. Defra Project code PS2001, 18 pp. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2005. Assessing the indirect effects of pesticides on birds. Final report PN0925 under Project CTD9804, 40 pp. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2007. Methods of addressing variability and uncertainty for improved pesticide risk assessments for non-target arthropods. Defra Project code PS2307, 27 pp. Desneux N, Denoyelle R and Kaiser L, 2006. A multi-step bioassay to assess the effect of the deltamethrin on the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi. Chemosphere, 65, 1697– 1706. Desneux N, Fauvergue X, Dechaume-Moncharmont, X, Kerhoas L, Ballanger Y and Kaiser L, 2005. Diaeretiella rapae limits Myzus persicae populations after applications of deltamethrin in oilseed rape. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 9– 17. Devine, G.J. and M.J. Furlong (2007): Insecticide use: Contexts and ecological consequences. Agr. Human Values 24, 281– 306. doi 10.1007/s10460-007-9067-z. Douka C and Tchuenguem F-N, 2014 Foraging and pollination activity of Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) on flowers of Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae) at Maroua, Cameroon. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 4, 63– 76. Dover, J. W. (1997). Dover JW, 1997. Conservation headlands: Effects on butterfly distribution and behaviour. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 63(1): 31– 49. Duelli P, Studer M, Marchand I and Jakob S, 1990a. Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biological Conservation, 54, 193– 207. Duelli P, Studer M and Marchand I, 1990b. The influence of the surroundings on Arthropod diversity in maize fields. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 24, 73– 76. Duffield SJ, Jepson PC, Wratten Sd and Sotherton NW, 1996. Spatial changes in invertebratepredation rate in winter wheat following treatment with dimethoate. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 78, 9– 17. EC (European Commission), 2002. Guidance document on terrestrial ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/10329/2002) revision 2, final, 17.10.2002. 1– 39. Edwards CA, Sunderland KD and George KS, 1979. Studies on polyphagous predators of cereal aphids. Journal of Applied Ecology, 16, 811– 823. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) on a request from EFSA related to the assessment of the acute and chronic risk to aquatic organisms with regard to the possibility of lowering the uncertainty factor if additional species were tested. The EFSA Journal 2006, 301, 1– 45. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2006.301. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007a. Opinion of the Scientific Committee related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment. The EFSA Journal 2007, 438, 1– 54. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.438. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007b. Opinion on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal 622, 1– 32. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.622. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals. EFSA Journal 734, 181. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009a. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds & Mammals on request from EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12): 1438. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009b. Outcome of the Public Consultation on the existing Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology under Directive 91/414/EC. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(11): 1375. 129 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1375. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Scientific Opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA Journal 2010; 8(10): 1821, 55 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1821. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013a. Biodiversity as protection goal in environmental risk assessment for EU agro-ecosystems. Summary report of the 19th EFSA Scientific Colloquium, 72 pp. Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/doc/583e.pdf. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013b. Guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7): 3295, 268 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014a. Guidance on Expert Knowledge Elicitation in Food and Feed Safety Risk Assessment. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(6): 3734, 278 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3734. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014b. EFSA Guidance Document for evaluating laboratory and field dissipation studies to obtain DegT50 values of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(5): 3662, 37 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3662. EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2010. Scientific Opinion on outline proposals for assessment of exposure of organisms to substances in soil. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(1): 1442, 38 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1442. EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2012. Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental concentrations in soil. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(2): 2562. [76 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562. EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2013c. Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7): 3290, 268 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3290. EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2014c. Scientific Opinion on good modelling practice in the context of mechanistic effect models for risk assessment of plant protection products. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(3): 3589, 92 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3589. Ekbom BS, Wiktelius S and Chiverton PA, 1992. Can polyphagous predators control the bird cherryoat aphid (Rhopalosiphum-padi) in spring cereals – a simulation study. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 65, 215– 223. Ekroos J, Olsson O, Rundlöf M, Wätzold F and Smith HG, 2014. Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both? Biological Conservation, 172, 65– 71. Ekroos J, Kuussaari M, Tiainen J, Heliölä J, Seimola T and Helenius J, 2013. Correlations in species richness between taxa depend on habitat, scale and landscape context. Ecologial Indicators, 34, 528– 535. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization)/Council of Europe Risk, 1994. Decision making scheme for the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products. Chapter 9, Arthropod Natural Enemies. Bulletin OEPPIEPPO. Bulletin, 24, 17– 35. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2003. Decision making scheme for the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products. EPPO Bulletin, 33, 131– 139. Elzinga JA, Turin H, Van Damme, JMM & Biere A, 2005. Plant population size and isolation affect herbivory of Silene latifolia by the specialist herbivore Hadena bicruris and parasitism of the herbivore by parasitoids. Oecologia, 144, 416– 426. ESA (Ecological Society of America), 2014. Revealing secrets about… the birds and the bees. Pollination: An Essential Ecosystem Service. In: Communicating Ecosystem Services Project. EU (European Union), 1997. Doc. 397L0057. Council Directive 97/57/EC of 22 September 1997 establishing Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal L 265, 0087– 0109. European Commission, 2006. Development of agri-environmental indicators for monitoring the integration of environmental concerns into the common agricultural policy. Communication COM 508 final. Evans KL, Wilson JD and Bradbury RB, 2007. Effects of crop type and aerial invertebrate abundance on foraging barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 122, 267– 273. Everts JW, Willemsen I, Stulp M, Simons L, Aukema B and Kammenga J, 1991. The toxic effect of deltamethrin on linyphiid and erigonid spiders in connection with ambient temperature, humidity and predation. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 20 (1), 20– 24. Faegri K and Van der Pijl L, 1979. The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 248pp. Fahrig L and Nuttle WK, 2005. Population ecology in spatially heterogeneous environments. In: Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Eds GM Lovett, CG Jones, MG Turner and KC. Weathers Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 95– 118. Finke DL and Denno RF, 2004. Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature, 429, 407– 410. Fletcher R J, 2005. Multiple edge effects and their implications in fragmented landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 342– 352. FOCUS. 2000. FOCUS groundwater scenarios in the EU review of active substances.EU. FOCUS. 2001. FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS surface water scenarios workgroup on surface water scenarios.SANCO. Forbes VE and Calow P, 2002. Species sensitivity distributions revisited: a critical appraisal. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8, 473– 492. Frampton GK and Dorne JLCM, 2007. The effects on terrestrial invertebrates of reducing pesticide inputs in arable crop edges: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 362– 373. Freier B, Triltsch H, Moewes M and Rappaport V, 1998. Predator units – an approach to evaluate coccinellids within the aphid predator community. IOBC-WPRS Bulletins, 21, 103– 111. Freier B, Triltsch H, Moewes M and Moll E, 2007. The potential of predators in natural control of aphids in wheat: Results of a ten-year field study in two German landscapes. BioControl, 52, 775– 788. doi 10.1007/s10526-007-9081-5. Gardner RH, Engelhardt KAM, Elmore AJ and Cadol D, 2014. A traits-based model of species diversity. Ecological Modelling, 228, 178– 194. Gaylor DW and Kodell RL, 2000. Percentiles of the product of uncertainty factors for establishing probabilistic reference doses. Risk Analysis, 20, 245– 250. Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmersond M, Morales MB, Ceryngier P, Liira J, Tscharntke T, Winqvist C, Eggers S, Bommarco R, Pärt T, Bretagnolle V, Plantegenest M, Clement LW, Dennis C, Palmerd C, Oñate JJ, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Aavik T, Thies C, Flohre A, Hänke S, Fischer C, Goedhart PW and Inchausti P, 2010. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 97– 105. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A and Rubin DB, 2013. Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London, UK. Genduso P, 1979. Grain pentatomids in Italy and investigations on the biocoenoses in the newly sown fields and shelter vegetation. I pentatomidi del grano in Italia e ricerche sulla biocenosi nei seminativi e nella vegetazione rifugio. Bollettino dell'Istituto di Entomologia Agraria e dell'Osservatorio di Fitopatologia di Palermo, 9, 59– 74.
Referência(s)