Spacecraft Thruster Control via Sigma–Delta Modulation
2017; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Volume: 40; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2514/1.g002986
ISSN1533-3884
AutoresRichard Zappulla, Josep Virgili-Llop, Marcello Romano,
Tópico(s)Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
ResumoNo AccessEngineering NoteSpacecraft Thruster Control via Sigma–Delta ModulationRichard Zappulla II, Josep Virgili-Llop and Marcello RomanoRichard Zappulla IINaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943*Ph.D. Candidate, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, 1 University Circle. Student Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this author, Josep Virgili-LlopNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943†Postdoctoral Research Associate, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, 1 University Circle. Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this author and Marcello RomanoNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943‡Professor, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, 1 University Circle. Associate Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:19 Jul 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002986SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Wie B., Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control, 2nd ed., AIAA, Reston, VA, 2008, pp. 77–78, 350–353, 359–361, 425–444, 478–482, 558–574. LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Bernelli-Zazzera F., Mantegazza P. and Nurzia V., “Multi-Pulse-Width Modulated Control of Linear Systems,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1998, pp. 64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4198 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Curti F., Romano M. and Bevilacqua R., “Lyapunov-Based Thrusters’ Selection for Spacecraft Control: Anlaysis and Experimentation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dyanmics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1143–1160. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47296 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Song G. and Agrawal B. N., “Vibration Suppression of Flexible Spacecraft During Attitude Control,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2001, pp. 73–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00163-6 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Norsworthy S. R., Schreier R. and Temes G. C., (eds.), Quantization Noise in ΔΣ A/D Converters, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1997, Chaps. Preface,1,2. Google Scholar[6] Inose H., Yasuda Y. and Murakami J., “A Telemetering System by Code Modulation—Δ–Σ Modulation,” IRE Transaction on Space Electronics and Telemetry, Vol. SET-8, No. 3, 1962, pp. 204–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IRET-SET.1962.5008839 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Janssen E. and van Roermund A., Basics of Sigma-Delta Modulation, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011, pp. 5–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1387-1_2 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] de la Rosa J. M., “Sigma-Delta Modulators: Tutorial Overview, Design Guide, and State-of-the-Art Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2010.2097652 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Ciarcià M., Cristi R. and Romano M., “Emulating Scaled Clohessy-Wiltshire Dynamics on a Flat Air-Bearing Spacecraft Simulation Testbed,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, June 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002585 Google Scholar[10] Aziz P. M., Sorensen H. V. and vn der Spiegel J., “An Overview of Sigma-Delta Converters,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1996, pp. 61–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/79.482138 ISPRE6 1053-5888 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Sira-Ramírez H., Sliding Mode Control: The Delta-Sigma Modulation Approach, Springer International, Cham, Switzerland, 2015, pp. 89–125, Chap. 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] DeBra D. B., “16.338: Pulse Modulators,” Stanford Univ., 1990, pp. 1–2, https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-30-estimation-and-control-of-aerospace-systems-spring-2004/lecture-notes/intro_nnl.pdf [retrieved 6 March 2016]. Google Scholar[13] Jeon S. W. and Jung S., “Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation for the Reaction Control System Using PWM-Based Limit Cycle Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2012, pp. 538–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2117427 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Zappulla R., Virgili–Llop J., Park H., Zagaris C. and Romano M., “Dynamic Air-Bearing Hardware-in-the-Loop Testbed to Experimentally Evaluate Autonomous Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvers,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, April 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33769 JSCRAG 0022-4650 Google Scholar[15] Sun J., Pulse-Width Modulation, Springer, London, 2012, pp. 25–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2885-4_2 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Nise N. S., Control Systems Engineering, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, 2008, Chap. 13. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byCentralized/decentralized indirect robust adaptive control for spacecraft attitude and robotics9 October 2022 | International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 33, No. 2Development of a tip-tilt air-bearing testbed for physically emulating proximity-flight orbital mechanicsAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 168Attitude Stabilization of Spacecraft Using Variable Step-Size Pulse-Width-Modulated ThrustersXiaowei Zhang, Shuang Li , Beichao Wang and Bingheng Wang13 October 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 2Passivity-Based Pulse-Width-Modulated Spacecraft Attitude ControlXiaoyu Lang and Anton de Ruiter30 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Two-level quantised control systems: sliding-mode approach22 June 2018 | International Journal of Control, Vol. 93, No. 3Real-Time Autonomous Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvers and Docking Using an Adaptive Artificial Potential Field ApproachIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 27, No. 6Simultaneous Capture and Detumble of a Resident Space Object by a Free-Flying Spacecraft-Manipulator System27 March 2019 | Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol. 6A convex-programming-based guidance algorithm to capture a tumbling object on orbit using a spacecraft equipped with a robotic manipulator10 December 2018 | The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 38, No. 1Tube-based robust model predictive control for spacecraft proximity operations in the presence of persistent disturbanceAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 77Comparison of Sigma-Delta and Pulse-Width Modulation for Spacecraft Thruster ControlRichard Zappulla, Josep Virgili-Llop and Marcello Romano7 January 2018Laboratory experiments of resident space object capture by a spacecraft–manipulator systemAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 71 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 11November 2017 CrossmarkInformationThis material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsIon ThrusterPropellantPropulsion and PowerSpace Systems and VehiclesSpacecraft PropulsionSpacecrafts KeywordsThrustersSpacecraftsControl Moment GyroscopeClosed LoopAnalog CircuitsFeedback LoopPropellantNumerical SimulationSpacecraft AttitudeFuel ConsumptionAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to sincerely thank Roberto Cristi for introducing us to the Sigma–Delta modulator in addition to the useful discussion during the course of this work.PDF Received19 April 2017Accepted13 May 2017Published online19 July 2017
Referência(s)