Produção Nacional
Revisado por pares
Inferring the phylogenetic position of the Drosophila flavopilosa group: Incongruence within and between mitochondrial and nuclear multilocus datasets
2017; Wiley; Volume: 55; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/jzs.12170
ISSN1439-0469
AutoresFrancine Cenzi De Ré, Lizandra Jaqueline Robe, Gabriel Luz Wallau, Élgion L. S. Loreto,
Tópico(s)Evolution and Paleontology Studies
ResumoJournal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary ResearchVolume 55, Issue 3 p. 208-221 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Inferring the phylogenetic position of the Drosophila flavopilosa group: Incongruence within and between mitochondrial and nuclear multilocus datasets Francine C. De Ré, Francine C. De Ré Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilThese authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorLizandra J. Robe, Lizandra J. Robe Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilThese authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorGabriel L. Wallau, Gabriel L. Wallau Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Departamento de Entomologia, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães - FIOCRUZ-IAM, Recife, PE, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorElgion L. S. Loreto, Corresponding Author Elgion L. S. Loreto elgion@base.ufsm.br orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-8168 Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Departamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Correspondence Elgion L. S. Loreto, Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Email: elgion@base.ufsm.brSearch for more papers by this author Francine C. De Ré, Francine C. De Ré Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilThese authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorLizandra J. Robe, Lizandra J. Robe Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilThese authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorGabriel L. Wallau, Gabriel L. Wallau Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Departamento de Entomologia, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães - FIOCRUZ-IAM, Recife, PE, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorElgion L. S. Loreto, Corresponding Author Elgion L. S. Loreto elgion@base.ufsm.br orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-8168 Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Departamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Correspondence Elgion L. S. Loreto, Programa de Pós Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Email: elgion@base.ufsm.brSearch for more papers by this author First published: 21 July 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12170Citations: 5 Contributing authors: Francine C. De Ré (franbio20@gmail.com); Lizandra J. Robe (lizbiogen@gmail.com); Gabriel L. Wallau (gabriel.wallau@gmail.com) Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Inconsistencies and incongruences in phylogenetics may result from inaccurate reconstructions or from real differences between gene and species trees. The flavopilosa group of species is assumed to be part of the virilis–repleta radiation of the Drosophila subgenus, but its positioning within this clade is still controversial. To address the possible causes of extensive incongruence among phylogenies regarding this relationship, concordance patterns within and between mitochondrial and nuclear loci were inferred, with the aim of providing a more confident description of the phylogenetic position of Drosophila incompta. For this, Bayesian and Bayesian concordance analyses were performed using mitochondrial (13 protein-coding genes) and nuclear (25 protein-coding genes) datasets, in a broader (18 Drosophila species alongside Phortica variegata as an outgroup) and a restricted form (four species of the sister radiations virilis–repleta/Hawaiian Drosophila with D. simulans as an outgroup), considering the effects of saturation and compositional bias. Our results revealed the presence of significant inconsistencies between Drosophila mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, and the two groups of markers present contrasting signals in regard to the phylogenetic positioning of the D. flavopilosa group. Whereas mitochondrial genomes support the clade formed by D. incompta and Drosophila mojavensis, the nuclear genome indicates D. incompta and Drosophila virilis are sister species. The inconsistency remains even after double control of saturation and sampling differences in nucleotide-partitioned and amino acid sequences, and even with the use of maximum likelihood approaches followed by the implementation of Partition Addition Bootstrap Alteration principles. Therefore, we argue that it stems mainly from differences in the evolutionary histories of both sets of markers, with the nuclear phylogeny taken as the best depiction of the evolutionary history of the flavopilosa group. Thus, our results highlight the importance of integrative approaches for phylogenetic reconstruction, especially for groups of putatively complex evolutionary history, as in the case of Drosophila. Citing Literature Supporting Information Filename Description jzs12170-sup-0001-TableS1-S4.pdfPDF document, 101.5 KB Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Volume55, Issue3August 2017Pages 208-221 RelatedInformation
Referência(s)