Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Evolution and development of monocot stomata

2017; Wiley; Volume: 104; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.3732/ajb.1700086

ISSN

1537-2197

Autores

Paula J. Rudall, Elisabeth Chen, Erin Cullen,

Tópico(s)

Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics

Resumo

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Leaves of monocots are typically linear with parallel venation, though a few taxa have broad leaves. Studies of stomatal patterning and development in monocots required updating in the context of rapidly improving knowledge of both the phylogenetic and development‐genetic context of monocots that facilitate studies of character evolution. METHODS: We used an existing microscope‐slide collection to obtain data on stomatal structure across all the major monocot clades, including some species with relatively broad leaves. In addition, we used both light and electron microscopy to study stomatal development in 16 selected species. We evaluated these data in a phylogenetic context to assess stomatal character evolution. KEY RESULTS: Mature stomatal patterning in monocots can be broadly categorized as anomocytic, paracytic‐nonoblique, and paracytic/tetracytic oblique, depending on the presence, development, and arrangement of lateral subsidiary cells. Stomatal meristemoids invariably result from an asymmetric mitosis in monocots. In species where lateral subsidiary cells are present, they are perigene cells. Among monocots with relatively broad leaves, stomatal orientation is linear‐axial in most taxa, but transverse in Lapageria and Stemona , and random in Dioscorea and some Araceae. Amplifying divisions are apparently absent in monocots. CONCLUSIONS: Anomocytic stomata represent the likely ancestral (plesiomorphic) condition in monocots, though multiple evolutionary transitions and reversals have occurred. Paracytic‐nonoblique stomata with highly modified perigene lateral neighbor cells characterize grasses and other Poales. The presence of anomocytic stomata in Japonolirion and Tofieldia reinforces the concept that these two genera have retained many ancestral monocot features and are critical in understanding character evolution in monocots.

Referência(s)