Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

El litigio de la fosforita de Logrosán y la aplicación de la legislación minera en el siglo XIX

2016; Royal Spanish Society of Natural History; Volume: 110; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

0583-7510

Alfonso de las Llanderas López,

Historical and Environmental Studies

espanolLos litigios entre empresarios en los Tribunales de Justicia, para obtener la propiedad minera de los terrenos en los que se encontraba la fosforita de Logrosan, fue la principal causa de que no se aprovechase esta industrialmente de modo continuo en el periodo 1845-1868. Estos litigios llegaron hasta la intervencion del Presidente de Gobierno Francisco Serrano en 1868. Es la segunda intervencion del Gobierno de Espana en materia de explotacion minera de la fosforita en Extremadura, pues la primera fue en 1857, siendo Presidente del Consejo de Ministros Ramon Maria Narvaez. En 1857 se intento declarar la fosforita mediante un Proyecto de Ley como sustancia reservada al Estado, pero que finalmente fue rechazado. Este articulo trata de la segunda intervencion del Gobierno y se basa en la publicacion de la Gaceta de Madrid del 8 de febrero de 1869, del Decreto de 10 de octubre de 1868 del Presidente del Gobierno Provisional resolutorio del pleito entre Julian de Luna (1789-1848) y su hijo Mario de Luna con un grupo de empresarios, que duro veintitres anos (1845-1868). Del Decreto se extrae como era la aplicacion de tres Leyes de Minas (1825, 1849, 1859), la Administracion, intereses y nombres de los litigantes, etc. Tras este Decreto, comenzo a explotarse de modo continuo la fosforita de Logrosan. EnglishLogrosan phosphorite was discovered in 1754 and published his discovery in 1775 (Bowles (1775). In the publication of the Junta de Extremadura, named La Mineria en Extremadura (1987: 15, 141), referred to “the first news about deposits of phosphates in Logrosan date back to the reign of Carlos III and is not until 1864 when they begin to request permissions for research or exploitation, while practically up to 1900 there is work, as a consequence of the differences that have emerged between the Sociedad General de Fosfatos and the owners of the land” and “between 1917 and 1921 Logrosan dikes, mainly “Costanaza”, they produce about 90.000 tons of ore, which represent 50 per 100 of national production, wealth of 60 to 80 per 100 of tricalcium phosphate”. “The permanent cessation of these works in Logrosan occurred in 1956 and the facilities were dismantled.” According to Boixereu (2004:28, 2015: 94), the Decade of the sixties of the 19th century is that of the beginning of industrial exploitation in the Costanaza dike and six years later stopped production. The work undertaken on the Costanaza dike were irregular ditches some of them very deep, large number of pits, and some shallow shafts. The pre-industrial history of mining of Logrosan phosphates was the result of the succession of 114 years of slow evolution with three periods: 1 - Discovery (1754 to 1787), 2 - Testing laboratories for their knowledge (1788-1832) and 3 - Mining research and the early attempts of exploitation with a view to its industrial use (1833 to 1868). This article is a study of litigation in the Courts, among entrepreneurs, to have the ownership of the land where the phosphorite of Logrosan was. It was the main reason that this not be successfully exploited industrially continuously in the period 1845-1868.These disputes end with the intervention of the President of the Governement Francisco Serrano (1810-1885). It’s the second intervention in mining organization of Logrosan for the Government of Spain, because the first intervention was in 1857 with the project of law, finally rejected, to declare phosphorite like substance that could only exploit the State. This article is based on the publication of the Gaceta de Madrid, pioneer publication of the Boletin Oficial del Estado, of 8 February 1869, which develops the Decree of 10 October 1868 of the President of the Interim Government decision-making of the lawsuit between Mr. Julian de Luna (1789-1848) and his son Mario de Luna with a group of entrepreneurs that lasted 23 years (1845-1868). The Decree removed how was the application of the three laws of mines (1825, 1849 and 1859), other Orders, interests and names of those interested, etc. After this Decree, he began to exploit the Logrosan phosphorite. This lawsuit has always been considered in the memories of the Estadistica Minera de Espana in those years. Julian de Luna had, on January 16, 1840, writing at the offices of the municipality of Logrosan, stating that he had designed to exploit phosphate limestone dike in the lands owned by all the people of the village. The laws of mines gave the main guidelines of administrative and business performance. The 1825 act declared free Phosphorite exploitation, without administrative concession, while from the 1859, the granting by the State was already required for exploitation. Nicanor Fernandez Bravo made requests for mining of phosphate limestone, dated February 14, 1863, in his name (the Porvenir mine) and on behalf of the other three components of the society, Pedro de Echevarria (Esperanza mine), Pedro Ebejon, (Abandonada mine) and Ignacio Maria de Arevalo (Fundadora mine) on land that Mr. Luna exploded. Finally the Decree of 1868 was in favor of Mario de Luna and declared void Nicanor Fernandez Bravo. The records data of various historical publications indicate mainly that are a exploitation aimed at promoting of its study, analysis and tests until 1863-1864 (Table I), while the memories of the Estadistica Minera de Espana, who always had considered in the mining domain of Logrosan litigation which impeded its development, and show from that year and until 1869 it was rapidly growing, reaching the 128.000 metric quintals in 1865 (Table II).