Factors associated with outcomes of inpatient stroke rehabilitation
2017; Mark Allen Group; Volume: 25; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.1.34
ISSN1759-779X
AutoresSinikka Tarvonen-Schröder, Jaakko Matomäki, Katri Laimi,
Tópico(s)Neurological Disorders and Treatments
ResumoInternational Journal of Therapy and RehabilitationVol. 25, No. 1 PracticeFactors associated with outcomes of inpatient stroke rehabilitationSinikka Tarvonen-Schröder, Jaakko Matomäki, Katri LaimiSinikka Tarvonen-SchröderSearch for more papers by this author, Jaakko MatomäkiSearch for more papers by this author, Katri LaimiSearch for more papers by this authorSinikka Tarvonen-Schröder; Jaakko Matomäki; Katri LaimiPublished Online:28 Dec 2017https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.1.34AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References The AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9988):46–55. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0 Crossref, Google ScholarBagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2002;33(1):179–185. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/hs0102.101224 Crossref, Google ScholarBernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004;35(4):1005–1009. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40 Crossref, Google ScholarBernhardt J, Thuy MN, Collier JM, Legg LA. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006187. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006187.pub2 Google ScholarBorschmann K, Lynch EA. Understanding patients' rehabilitation requirements after stroke—are we there yet? Int J Ther Rehabil. 2016;23(Sup11):S534–S535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.Sup11.S534 Link, Google ScholarCaglar NS, Akin T, Erdem IH, Ozgonenel L, Aytekin E, Tutun S, et al.. Where are we in terms of poststroke functional outcomes and risk factors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(3):391–399. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-141060 Google ScholarCalmels P, Defay C, Yvanes-Thomas M, Laporte S, Fayolle-Minon I, Béthoux F, et al.. [Is very old age a prognostic factor for outcome after a first stroke?]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;48(9):675–681. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.07.003 Crossref, Google ScholarCisternino MD, Giaquinto S, Maiolo I, Palma E, Valeriani M, Vittoria E. On the outcome in stroke patients one year later: the role of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10(1):67–70. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00514.x Crossref, Google ScholarDiserens K, Michel P, Bogousslavsky J. Early mobilisation after stroke: review of the literature. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;14;22(2–3):183–190. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000093453 Crossref, Google ScholarEriksson M, Norrving B, Terént A, Stegmayr B. Functional outcome 3 months after stroke predicts long-term survival. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):423–429. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000121343 Crossref, Google ScholarEuropean Stroke Organisation Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):457–507. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000131083 Crossref, Google ScholarGialanella B, Ferlucci C. Functional outcome after stroke in patients with aphasia and neglect: assessment by the motor and cognitive functional independence measure instrument. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30(5):440–447. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000317080 Crossref, Google ScholarGialanella B, Santoro R, Ferlucci C. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of basic activities of daily living predicting outcome after stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49(5):629–637. Google ScholarGiaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Francesco L, Lottarini A, Montenero P, In PT, Nolfe G. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100(3):202–208. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1999.tb00740.x Crossref, Google ScholarGoldberg G. Don't delay but scale the pay: some lessons learned about stroke rehabilitation. PM R. 2011;3(4):305–306. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.01.007 Crossref, Google ScholarGranger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(2):133–138. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199503000-00004 Google ScholarJehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, Koivisto AM, Laippala P, Vilkki J, Molnár G. Predictors of discharge to home during the first year after right hemisphere stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2001;104(3):136–141. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.00025.x Crossref, Google ScholarJohnston SC, Mendis S, Mathers CD. Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):345–354. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70023-7 Crossref, Google ScholarLauretani F, Saccavini M, Zaccaria B, Agosti M, Zampolini M, Franceschini M; ICR2 Group. Rehabilitation in patients affected by different types of stroke. A one-year follow-up study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):511–516. Google ScholarLynch EA, Luker JA, Cadilhac DA, Hillier SL. Inequities in access to rehabilitation: exploring how acute stroke unit clinicians decide who to refer to rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Jul 02;38(14):1415–1424. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1103791 Crossref, Google ScholarMaeshima S, Okamoto S, Okazaki H, Mizuno S, Asano N, Maeda H, et al.. Potential factors, including activities of daily living, influencing home discharge for patients with putaminal haemorrhage. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):16. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0539-x Crossref, Google ScholarMurie-Fernández M, Ortega-Cubero S, Carmona-Abellán M, Meyer M, Teasell R. [Time is brain: only in the acute phase of stroke?]. Neurologia. 2012;27(4):197–201. [English Edition]. Google ScholarOrme F and Gurr B. Cognitive change following stroke and its impact on long-term care. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2016;23(Sup11), S543-S548. Link, Google ScholarOuellette DS, Timple C, Kaplan SE, Rosenberg SS, Rosario ER. Predicting discharge destination with admission outcome scores in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(2):173–179. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151250 Crossref, Google ScholarMeyer MJ, Pereira S, McClure A, Teasell R, Thind A, Koval J, et al.. A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1316–1323. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.963706 Crossref, Google ScholarPerkins N, Skrypak M, Barron S, Kilbride C, Simister R, Walker H. Hyper acute stroke unit patient suitability for early supported discharge: Coordination and data analysis project. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2016;23(Sup11):S536–S538. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.Sup11.S543 Link, Google ScholarPetrilli S, Durufle A, Nicolas B, Pinel JF, Kerdoncuff V, Gallien P. Hémiplégie vasculaire et retour à domicile. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2002;45(2):69–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6054(01)00179-9 Crossref, Google ScholarReistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):345–350. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.010 Crossref, Google ScholarRing H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the functional independence measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):630–635. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90429-9 Crossref, Google ScholarRoth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Bode RK. Delay in transfer to inpatient stroke rehabilitation: the role of acute hospital medical complications and stroke characteristics. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(1):57–64. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1401-57 Crossref, Google ScholarSalter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N, Teasell R. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(2):113–117. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970500314350 Crossref, Google ScholarShah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21(2):241–246. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.2.241 Crossref, Google ScholarRoyal College of Physicians. Stroke guidelines [Internet]; 2016 [cited 2017 December 17]. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/stroke-guidelines. Google ScholarStroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4):CD000197. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub3 Google ScholarStrong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:182–187. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70031-5 Crossref, Google ScholarWang H, Camicia M, Terdiman J, et al.. (2011) Time to inpatient rehabilitation hospital admission and functional outcomes of stroke patients. PM R. 2007;3:296–304, quiz 304. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.018 Crossref, Google ScholarWang H, Camicia M, Terdiman J, Hung YY, Sandel ME. Time to inpatient rehabilitation hospital admission and functional outcomes of stroke patients. PM R. 2011;3(4):296–304, quiz 304. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.018 Crossref, Google ScholarWorld Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases. Tenth edition. Geneva: WHO;1994. Google ScholarWinstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC. 2016 Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098 Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 January 2018Volume 25Issue 1ISSN (online): 1759-779X Metrics History Published online 28 December 2017 Published in print 2 January 2018 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download
Referência(s)