Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Risk of Hematologic Malignancies After Radioiodine Treatment of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

2017; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 36; Issue: 18 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1200/jco.2017.75.0232

ISSN

1527-7755

Autores

Remco J. Molenaar, Surbhi Sidana, Tomas Radivoyevitch, Anjali S. Advani, Aaron T. Gerds, Hetty E. Carraway, Dana E. Angelini, Matt Kalaycio, Aziz Nazha, David J. Adelstein, Christian Nasr, Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski, Navneet S. Majhail, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Sudipto Mukherjee,

Tópico(s)

Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Resumo

Purpose To investigate the risk and outcomes of second hematologic malignancies (SHMs) in a population-based cohort of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) treated or not with radioactive iodine (RAI). Methods Patients with WDTC were identified from SEER registries. Competing risk regression analysis was performed to calculate the risks of SHMs that occurred after WDTC treatment and outcomes after SHM development were assessed. Results Of 148,215 patients with WDTC, 53% received surgery alone and 47% received RAI. In total, 783 patients developed an SHM after a median interval of 6.5 years (interquartile range, 3.3 to 11.2 years) from WDTC diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, compared with those undergoing thyroidectomy alone, RAI treatment was associated with an increased early risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML; hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.82; P = .01) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; hazard ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.87 to 6.36; P < .001). This increased risk of AML and CML after RAI treatment was seen even in low-risk and intermediate-risk WDTC tumors. Occurrence of AML but not CML in patients with WDTC was associated with shorter median overall survival compared with matched controls (8.0 years v 31.0 years; P = .001). In addition, AML developing after RAI trended toward inferior survival compared with matched controls with de novo AML (median overall survival, 1.2 years v 2.9 years; P = .06). Conclusion Patients with WDTC treated with RAI had an increased early risk of developing AML and CML but no other hematologic malignancies. AML that arises after RAI treatment has a poor prognosis. RAI use in patients with WDTC should be limited to patients with high-risk disease features, and patients with WDTC treated with adjuvant RAI should be monitored for myeloid malignancies as part of cancer surveillance.

Referência(s)