Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

IS THE BUYING OF LOOT BOXES IN VIDEO GAMES A FORM OF GAMBLING OR GAMING?

2018; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Volume: 22; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1089/glr2.2018.2216

2572-5327

Mark D. Griffiths,

Gambling Behavior and Treatments

Gaming Law ReviewVol. 22, No. 1 CommentariesFree AccessIS THE BUYING OF LOOT BOXES IN VIDEO GAMES A FORM OF GAMBLING OR GAMING?Mark D. GriffithsMark D. GriffithsSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:1 Feb 2018https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2018.2216AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail “The novelty of [Las Vegas] can hide its true intentions. [Its] seediness might be hard to detect on the surface of many video games, but replace the roulette table with a Candy Crush wheel and the similarities become clearer. Think about how many times you've paid real-life money in a game for the chance to win an item you really wanted. Was it a nice Overwatch skin? Perhaps it was a coveted Hearthstone card. How many times did you not get the item you wanted, then immediately bought in for another chance to hit the big time?”1The buying of loot boxes takes place within online videogames and are (in essence) virtual games of chance. Players use real money to buy virtual in-game items and can redeem such items by buying keys to open the boxes where they receive a chance selection of further virtual items. Other types of equivalent in-game virtual assets that can be bought include crates, cases, chests, bundles, and card packs. The virtual items that can be “won” can comprise basic customization (i.e., cosmetic) options for a player's in-game character (avatar) or in-game assets that can help players progress more effectively in the game (e.g., gameplay improvement items such as weapons, armor).2 All players hope that they can win “rare” items and are often encouraged to spend more money to do so because the chances of winning such items are minimal. Many popular videogames now feature loot boxes (or equivalents) including Overwatch, Middle-earth: Shadow of War, Star Wars Battlefront 2, FIFA Ultimate Team, Mass Effect: Andromeda, Fortress 2, Injustice 2, Lawbreakers, Forza Motorsport 7, and For Honor.3 In short, all of these require the paying of real money in exchange for a completely random in-game item. In an interview with Eurogamer, psychologist Jamie Madigan said: “Whenever you open [a loot box], you may get something awesome (or you may get trash). This randomness taps into some of the very fundamental ways our brains work when trying to predict whether or not a good thing will happen. We are particularly excited by unexpected pleasures like a patch of wild berries or an epic skin for our character. This is because our brains are trying to pay attention to and trying to figure out such awesome rewards. But unlike in the real world, these rewards can be completely random (or close enough not to matter) and we can't predict randomness. But the reward system in your brain doesn't know that. Buying [loot boxes] puts them into the same category of packs of Pokémon cards or baseball cards. Unlike gambling in a casino, you're going to get something out of that pack. Maybe just not the thing you wanted.”4Although there are many definitions of gambling in many disciplines, there are a number of common elements that occur in the majority of gambling instances that distinguish “true” gambling from mere risk taking.5 These include: (1) the exchange is determined by a future event for which, at the time of staking money (or something of financial value), the outcome is unknown; (2) the result is determined (at least partly or wholly) by chance; (3) the re-allocation of wealth (i.e., the exchange of money [or something of financial value] usually without the introduction of productive work on either side); and (4) losses incurred can be avoided by simply not taking part in the activity in the first place. Added to this, it could be argued that the money or prize to be won should be of greater financial value than the money staked in the first place. Based on these elements, the buying of loot boxes (or equivalents) would be classed as a form of gambling, as would other activities such as the “Treasure Hunter” and “Squeal of Fortune” games within the Runescape video game6 and online penny auctions.7The UK Gambling Commission's most recent (March 2017) position paper on virtual currencies and social casino gambling noted: “One commonly used method for players to acquire in-game items is through the purchase of keys from the games publisher to unlock “crates,” “cases” or “bundles” which contain an unknown quantity and value of in-game items as a prize. The payment of a stake (key) for the opportunity to win a prize (in-game items) determined (or presented as determined) at random bears a close resemblance, for instance, to the playing of a gaming machine. Where there are readily accessible opportunities to cash in or exchange those awarded in-game items for money or money's worth those elements of the game are likely to be considered licensable gambling activities [Section 3.17] … Additional consumer protection in the form of gambling regulation, is required in circumstances where players are being incentivised to participate in gambling style activities through the provision of prizes of money or money's worth. Where prizes are successfully restricted for use solely within the game, such in-game features would not be licensable gambling, notwithstanding the elements of expenditure and chance” [Section 3.18].8Consequently, the UK Gambling Commission does not consider loot boxes as a form of gambling because (they claim) the in-game items have no real-life value outside of the game. However, this is not the case because there are many websites that allow players to trade in-game items and/or virtual currency for real money. The Gambling Commission appears to acknowledge this point and claim that the buying of in-game loot boxes (and their equivalents) are not gambling but, if third-party sites become involved (by allowing the buying and selling of in-game items), the activity does become a form of gambling. As Hood9 rightly notes, this appears to be a case of the law struggling to keep pace with technology. There are also issues surrounding age limits and whether games that offer loot boxes (or equivalents) should be restricted to those over the age of 18 years.Predictably, those in the video game industry do not view the buying of loot boxes as gambling either. For instance, Dirk Bosmans (from PEGI [Pan European Game Information], the European-based video game rating organization) stated in a recent interview with Eurogamer that: “Loot crates are currently not considered gambling: you always get something when you purchase them, even if it's not what you hoped for. For that reason, a loot crate system does not trigger the gambling content descriptor. If something is considered gambling, it needs to follow a very specific set of legislation, which has all kinds of practical consequences for the company that runs it. Therefore, the games that get a PEGI gambling content descriptor either contain content that simulates what is considered gambling or they contain actual gambling with cash payouts. If PEGI would label something as gambling while it is not considered as such from a legal point of view, it would mostly create confusion. We are always monitoring such developments and mapping consumer complaints. We see a growing need for information about specific features in games and apps (social interaction, data sharing, digital purchases), but the challenge is that such features are rapidly becoming ubiquitous in the market, yet they still come in very different shapes and sizes.”10This appears somewhat hardline given that PEGI's descriptor of gambling content is used whenever any video game “teaches or encourages” gambling. Such a descriptor would arguably cover gambling-like games or activities and the buying of loot boxes is “gambling-like” at the very least. The same stance has been taken by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) which rates video games in Canada and the USA.11 A spokesman for the ESRB told Eurogamer that: “ESRB does not consider [the buying of loot boxes] to be gambling because the player uses real money to pay for and obtain in-game content. The player is always guaranteed to receive something—even if the player doesn't want what is received. Think of it like opening a pack of collectible cards: sometimes you'll get a brand new, rare card, but other times you'll get a pack full of cards you already have. That said, ESRB does disclose gambling content should it be present in a game via one of two content descriptors: Simulated Gambling (player can gamble without betting or wagering real cash or currency) and Real Gambling (player can gamble, including betting or wagering real cash or currency). Neither of these apply to loot boxes and similar mechanics.”12At present, there are a number of countries (mainly in Southeast Asia, such as China and Japan) that do view the buying of loot boxes as a form of gambling and have incorporated such activities into their gambling regulations.13 However, most countries have either not considered regulating the buying of loot boxes at all, or (like the UK) have ruled that buying loot boxes does not currently meet their regulatory definition of gambling. Although there has been little published in academic journals on loot boxes, a number of articles in the trade press have claimed that the buying of loot boxes can be problematic and/or addictive because they are designed using reward schedules that are highly similar to those used in the design of slot machines.14 This is something that I have also pointed out in relation to similar activities to the buying of loot boxes where individuals play for points rather than money.15 Personally, I view the buying of loot boxes as a form of gambling, particularly because the “prizes” won are (in financial terms) often a lot less than that of the price paid. Obviously, I am out of step in relation to the regulators in my own country, but if third-party websites continue to host services where in-game virtual items can be bought and sold, the activity definitely constitutes a form of gambling by almost any definition of gambling currently used in the field of social sciences.1 Vic Hood, Are Loot Boxes Gambling?, Eurogamer (Oct. 12, 2017), http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-10-11-are-loot-boxes-gambling (last visited Oct 19, 2017).2 Id.; Alex Avard, Video Games Have a Loot Box Fetish, and It's Starting to Harm the Way We Play, Games Radar (Oct. 10, 2017), http://www.gamesradar.com/loot-boxes-shadow-of-war/ (last visited Oct. 19, 2017); Loot box, Wikipedia (2017), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loot_box (last visited Oct 19, 2017).3 Hood, supra note 1; Avard, supra note 2.4 Hood, supra note 1.5 Mark D. Griffiths, Adolescent Gambling (1995).6 Mark D. Griffiths and Rosie King, Are Mini-Games Within RuneScape Gambling or Gaming?, 19(9) Gaming L. Rev. & Econ. 640–643 (2015).7 Mark D. Griffiths and Margaret Carran, Are Online Penny Auctions a Form of Gambling?, 19(3) Gaming L. Rev. & Econ. 190–196 (2015).8 Gambling Commission, Virtual Currencies, Esports and Social Casino Gaming—Position Paper (2017).9 Hood, supra note 1.10 Id.11 Id.12 Id.13 Loot box, supra note 2.14 Heather Alexandra, Loot Boxes Are Designed to Exploit Us, Kotaku (Oct. 13, 2017), https://kotaku.com/loot-boxes-are-designed-to-exploit-us-1819457592 (last visited Oct 19, 2017); Nathan Lawrence, The Troubling Psychology of Pay-to-Loot Systems, IGN (Apr. 23, 2017), http://uk.ign.com/articles/2017/04/24/the-troubling-psychology-of-pay-to-loot-systems (last visited Oct 19, 2017); Matthew Perks, Limited Edition Loot Boxes: Problematic Gambling and Monetization, Cube (Oct. 11, 2016), https://medium.com/the-cube/limited-edition-loot-boxes-problematic-gambling-and-monetization-756819f2c54f (last visited Oct. 19, 2017); Alex Wiltshire, Behind the Addictive Psychology and Seductive Art of Loot Boxes, PC Gamer (Sept. 29, 2017), http://www.pcgamer.com/behind-the-addictive-psychology-and-seductive-art-of-loot-boxes/ (last visited Oct. 19, 2017).15 Mark D. Griffiths, Adolescent Gambling and Gambling-Type Games on Social Networking Sites: Issues, Concerns, and Recommendations, 33(2) Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport 31–37 (2015).FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byImpulsivity and loot box engagementTelematics and Informatics, Vol. 78Self-Generated Motives of Social Casino Gamers26 May 2022 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1Current loot box warnings are ineffective for informing consumersComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 139The evolution of young gambling studies: digital convergence of gaming, gambling and cryptocurrency technologies31 January 2023 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 23Surprisingly high prevalence rates of severe psychological distress among consumers who purchase loot boxes in video games27 September 2022 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1An Evaluation of Gaming-Related Harms in Relation to Gaming Disorder and Loot Box Involvement7 June 2021 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 20, No. 5Play or Pay to Win: Loot Boxes and Gaming Disorder in FIFA Ultimate TeamTelematics and Informatics Reports, Vol. 67Understanding the mechanics and consumer risks associated with play-to-earn (P2E) gamingJournal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 11, No. 3Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive21 July 2022 | Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 45, No. 3Teacher attitudes towards and awareness of adolescent gambling behavior in the UK16 August 2022 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 35Gaming-Gambling Convergence: Trends, Emerging Risks, and Legislative Responses20 April 2021 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 20, No. 4Gamblified digital product offerings: an experimental study of loot box menu designs17 May 2021 | Electronic Markets, Vol. 32, No. 2The relationship between videogame micro-transactions and problem gaming and gambling: A systematic reviewComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 131Balancing Ethics, Art and Economics: A Qualitative Analysis of Game Designer Perspectives on Monetisation8 December 2021 | Games and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 4Loot box purchasing is linked to problem gambling in adolescents when controlling for monetary gambling participationJournal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 26Online gaming and gaming disorder: more than just a trivial pursuit1 August 2019 | Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 1Implementation of the Game as a Service Research Model: Microperspective5 August 2022 | Economic Themes, Vol. 60, No. 1What’s in the box? Exploring UK players’ experiences of loot boxes in games; the conceptualisation and parallels with gambling9 February 2022 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 17, No. 2Which Implementations of Loot Boxes Constitute Gambling? A UK Legal Perspective on the Potential Harms of Random Reward Mechanisms24 August 2020 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 20, No. 1Problem gambling and income as predictors of loot box spending30 January 2022 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 26Vulnerability and Resilience in Childhood and Adolescence8 July 2022Artificial Intelligence, Data-Driven Learning, and the Decentralized Structure of Platform EcosystemsAcademy of Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 1Problematic online gambling among adolescents: A systematic review about prevalence and related measurement issuesJournal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 10, No. 3Meta-analysis of the relationship between problem gambling, excessive gaming and loot box spending26 April 2021 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3Menores y publicidad de juegos de azar en internet: nuevos formatos, contenidos publicitarios y retos en la protección de los menores23 August 2021 | El Profesional de la informaciónMeasuring Problem Online Video Gaming and Its Association With Problem Gambling and Suspected Motivational, Mental Health, and Behavioral Risk Factors in a Sample of University Students2 January 2020 | Games and Culture, Vol. 16, No. 4A descriptive pilot survey of behavioural addictions in an adolescent secondary school population in Ireland31 May 2021 | Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, Vol. 58“It’s the Attraction of Winning That Draws You in”—A Qualitative Investigation of Reasons and Facilitators for Videogame Loot Box Engagement in UK Gamers13 May 2021 | Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 10The interplay of micro-transaction type and amount of playing in video game evaluationsComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 115Loot Boxes, Gambling, and the Challenge of Regulating Random Chance Purchases in Videogames26 June 2021Effects of self-isolation and quarantine on loot box spending and excessive gaming—results of a natural experiment3 February 2021 | PeerJ, Vol. 9Gambling in children and adolescents15 September 2020 | British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 136, No. 1Loot boxes are gambling-like elements in video games with harmful potential: Results from a large-scale population surveyTechnology in Society, Vol. 63Conduct problems and depressive symptoms in association with problem gambling and gaming: A systematic reviewJournal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 9, No. 3Gaming-gambling convergence: evaluating evidence for the ‘gateway’ hypothesis2 June 2020 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3Gambling-gaming convergence: new developments and future directions17 September 2020 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3Mediatization of a card game: Magic: The Gathering, esports, and streaming16 October 2019 | Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 42, No. 6Diagnostic Usefulness of an Ultra-Brief Screener to Identify Risk of Online Gaming Disorder for Children and AdolescentsPsychiatry Investigation, Vol. 17, No. 8Addiction, Gambling and Gaming: Chasing the Digital Dragon ∗The Future of Gaming Disorder Research and Player Protection: What Role Should the Video Gaming Industry and Researchers Play?18 July 2019 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 18, No. 3Response to Commentary: the Future of Gaming Disorder Research and Player Protection: What Role Should the Video Gaming Industry and Researchers Play16 July 2019 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 18, No. 3Infinite Loot Box: A Platform for Simulating Video Game Loot BoxesIEEE Transactions on Games, Vol. 12, No. 2The ‘gambling turn’ in digital game monetizationJournal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, Vol. 12, No. 2Loot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: Findings from a national surveyAddictive Behaviors, Vol. 103Spanish Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Prevalence and Relationship with Online Gambling and Quality of Life28 February 2020 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 5A descriptive survey of online gaming characteristics and gaming disorder in Ireland28 February 2020 | Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, Vol. 1Definition and Diagnostics of Internet Use Disorders2 June 2020Costs to Compete - Analyzing Pay to Win Aspects in Current Games28 October 2020Adolescent gamblingFortnite microtransaction spending was associated with peers’ purchasing behaviors but not gaming disorder symptomsAddictive BehaviorsPaying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-winComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 102Design and Measurement Properties of the Online Gambling Disorder Questionnaire (OGD-Q) in Spanish Adolescents2 January 2020 | Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 1Unfair play? Video games as exploitative monetized services: An examination of game patents from a consumer protection perspectiveComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 101The relationship of loot box purchases to problem video gaming and problem gamblingAddictive Behaviors, Vol. 97Cryptocurrencies in the Ludic Economies: The Case of Contemporary Game Cultures28 August 2019The macro problem of microtransactions: The self-regulatory challenges of video game loot boxesBusiness Horizons, Vol. 62, No. 4Právní problematika lootboxů28 June 2019 | Revue pro právo a technologie, Vol. 10, No. 19Loot box limit‐setting: a potential policy to protect video game users with gambling problems?10 March 2019 | Addiction, Vol. 114, No. 5Loot boxes are again linked to problem gambling: Results of a replication study7 March 2019 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 3Video Game Monetization (e.g., ‘Loot Boxes’): a Blueprint for Practical Social Responsibility Measures17 October 2018 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 17, No. 1eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling16 July 2018 | New Media & Society, Vol. 21, No. 1 Volume 22Issue 1Feb 2018 InformationCopyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Mark D. Griffiths.IS THE BUYING OF LOOT BOXES IN VIDEO GAMES A FORM OF GAMBLING OR GAMING?.Gaming Law Review.Feb 2018.52-54.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2018.2216Published in Volume: 22 Issue 1: February 1, 2018Online Ahead of Print:January 16, 2018Keywordsloot boxessocial gamblingvirtual assetsin-game purchasingvideo game gamblingPDF download