Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Visuospatial counter‐interrogation strategies by liars familiar with the alibi setting

2018; Wiley; Volume: 32; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/acp.3383

1099-0720

Haneen Deeb, Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij, Leif A. Strömwall, Lorraine Hope, Samantha Mann,

Psychology of Social Influence

Summary This study examines counter‐interrogation strategies employed by liars giving false alibis. Participants ( N = 144) visited a restaurant to buy a sandwich (truth‐tellers) or to use it as a false alibi (liars). Half of the liars were informed they might be asked for a drawing of the alibi setting if interviewed (informed liars). Participants spent either 10 min (high familiarity condition) or 30 s (low familiarity condition) in the restaurant. All participants were asked to provide two visuospatial statements, which were assessed for salient details, nonsalient details, between‐statement consistency, and statement‐alibi setting consistency. Informed liars provided significantly more salient and nonsalient details than uninformed liars and truth‐tellers, particularly in the high familiarity condition. No differences emerged for statement consistency types. The results suggest that liars are more concerned than truth‐tellers about making a positive impression on the interviewer, and they fail to accurately reflect on truth‐tellers' visuospatial statements.