Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Transnasal Endoscopic and Lateral Approaches to the Clivus: A Quantitative Anatomic Study

2018; Elsevier BV; Volume: 113; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.118

1878-8769

Francesco Doglietto, Marco Ferrari, Davide Mattavelli, Francesco Belotti, Vittorio Rampinelli, Hussein Kheshaifati, Davide Lancini, Alberto Schreiber, Tommaso Sorrentino, Marco Ravanelli, Barbara Buffoli, Lena Hirtler, Roberto Maroldi, Piero Nicolai, Luigi Fabrizio Rodella, Marco Maria Fontanella,

Meningioma and schwannoma management

Transnasal endoscopic approaches to the clivus have been established recently. Comparative analyses with classic lateral approaches are limited. In this study, we compared transnasal endoscopic and lateral approaches to the clivus, quantifying the exposure and working volume of each approach in the anatomy laboratory.High-resolution computed tomography scans were performed on 5 injected specimens (10 sides). In each specimen, transnasal endoscopic approaches (i.e., paraseptal, transrostral, extended transrostral, transethmoidal, and extended transclival without and with intradural hypophysiopexy) and lateral approaches (i.e., retrosigmoid, far-lateral, presigmoid retrolabyrinthine and translabyrinthine) to the clivus were performed. An optic neuronavigation system and dedicated software (ApproachViewer; Guided Therapeutics Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) were used to quantify the working volume and exposed clival area of each approach. Statistical evaluation was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Steel-Dwass-Critchlow-Fligner post hoc test.Endoscopic transnasal transclival approaches showed higher working volume and larger clival exposure compared with lateral approaches. Incremental volumetric values were evident for transnasal approaches; presigmoid approaches provided less working volume than retrosigmoid approaches. A transnasal transclival approach with hypophysiopexy provided significant exposure of the upper clivus (84.4%). The transrostral approach was the first transnasal approach providing satisfactory access to the midclivus (66%); retrosigmoid and far-lateral approaches provided exposure of approximately one half of the midclivus. The lower clivus was optimally exposed with endoscopic transclival approaches (83%), whereas access to this region was limited with lateral approaches.This quantitative anatomic study shows that endoscopic transnasal approaches to the clivus provide a larger working volume and wider exposure of the clivus compared with lateral approaches.