Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis
2018; Elsevier BV; Volume: 50; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.004
ISSN1873-8028
AutoresNicholas H. Wasserman, Keith Weber, Matthew Villanueva, Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos,
Tópico(s)Statistics Education and Methodologies
ResumoIn the United States and elsewhere, prospective teachers of secondary mathematics are usually required to complete numerous advanced mathematics courses before obtaining certification. However, several research studies suggest that teachers' experiences in these advanced mathematics courses have little influence on their pedagogical practice and efficacy. To understand this phenomenon, we presented 14 secondary mathematics teachers with four statements and proofs in real analysis that related to secondary content and asked the participants to discuss whether these proofs could inform their teaching of secondary mathematics. In analyzing participants' remarks, we propose that many teachers view the utility of real analysis in secondary school mathematics teaching using a transport model, where the perceived importance of a real analysis explanation is dependent upon the teacher's ability to transport that explanation directly into their instruction in a secondary mathematics classroom. Consequently, their perceived value of a real analysis course in their teacher preparation is inherently limited. We discuss implications of the transport model on secondary mathematics teacher education.
Referência(s)