Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Is planting trees the solution to reducing flood risks?

2018; Wiley; Volume: 12; Issue: S2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/jfr3.12484

1753-318X

Jayne Carrick, Mohd Shaiful Azman Bin Abdul Rahim, Cosmos Adjei, Hassan Habib Hassan Ashraa Kalee, Steven James Banks, Friederike C. Bolam, Ivone Maritza Campos Luna, Beth Clark, Jake Cowton, Israel Freitas Nongando Domingos, D. Golicha, Garima Gupta, Matthew Grainger, Gultakin Hasanaliyeva, David John Hodgson, Elisa López‐Capél, Amelia Magistrali, Ian Merrell, Idiegberanoise Oikeh, Mwanajuma Salim Othman, Thilanka Kumari Ranathunga Ranathunga Mudiyanselage, Carl Warren Charles Samuel, Enas KH Sufar, Philip Alexander Watson, Nik Nur Azwanida Zakaria, Gavin Stewart,

Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Flood risk and associated impacts are major societal and policy concerns following widespread flooding in December 2015, which cost the UK economy an estimated £5 billion. Increasing advocacy for alternatives to conventional hard engineering solutions is accompanied by demands for evidence. This study provides a systematic review and meta‐analysis of direct evidence for the effect of tree cover on channel discharge. The results highlighted a deficiency in direct evidence. From 7 eligible studies of 156 papers reviewed, the results show that increasing tree cover has a small statistically significant effect on reducing channel discharge. Meta‐analysis reveals that tree cover reduces channel discharge (standardised mean difference −0.35, 95%CI, −0.71 to 0.00), but the effect was variable ( I 2 = 81.91%), the potential for confounding was high, and publication bias is strongly suspected (Egger Test z = 3.0568, p = .002). Due to the lack of direct evidence the overall strength of evidence is low, indicating high uncertainty. Further primary research is required to understand reasons for heterogeneity and reduce uncertainty. A Bayesian network parameterised with data from the meta‐analysis supports investment in integrated catchment management, particularly on infrastructure density and water storage (reservoirs), for effective responses to flood risk.