Artigo Acesso aberto Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

The efficiency of free-floating and emergent aquatic macrophytes in constructed wetlands for the treatment of a fishpond effluent

2018; Wiley; Volume: 49; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/are.13813

ISSN

1365-2109

Autores

João Alexandre Saviolo Osti, Matheus Nicolino Peixoto Henares, António Fernando Monteiro Camargo,

Tópico(s)

Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Resumo

Aquaculture ResearchVolume 49, Issue 10 p. 3468-3476 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The efficiency of free-floating and emergent aquatic macrophytes in constructed wetlands for the treatment of a fishpond effluent João A. S. Osti, Corresponding Author João A. S. Osti jale.osti@gmail.com orcid.org/0000-0002-2154-2453 Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence João A. S. Osti, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Email: jale.osti@gmail.comSearch for more papers by this authorMatheus N. P. Henares, Matheus N. P. Henares Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Laboratory of Aquatic Environments Ecology (LEAAqua), Education Foundation of Barretos (UNIFEB), Barretos, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorAntonio F. M. Camargo, Antonio F. M. Camargo Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Department of Ecology, Aquatic Ecology Lab (LEA), Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author João A. S. Osti, Corresponding Author João A. S. Osti jale.osti@gmail.com orcid.org/0000-0002-2154-2453 Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence João A. S. Osti, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Email: jale.osti@gmail.comSearch for more papers by this authorMatheus N. P. Henares, Matheus N. P. Henares Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Laboratory of Aquatic Environments Ecology (LEAAqua), Education Foundation of Barretos (UNIFEB), Barretos, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorAntonio F. M. Camargo, Antonio F. M. Camargo Aquaculture Center of UNESP (CAUNESP), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil Department of Ecology, Aquatic Ecology Lab (LEA), Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author First published: 14 August 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13813Citations: 8Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Many studies have evaluated the efficiency of constructed wetlands (CWs) for the treatment of fishpond effluents, but only a few have compared between CWs with emergent and free-floating macrophytes and assessed the amount of nutrients removed only by the macrophytes. For this purpose, we performed an experiment during 113 days in which we treated a fishpond effluent using four different CWs: (i) with the free-floating macrophyte Eichhornia crassipes (Ec); (ii) without E. crassipes (WEc); (iii) with a substrate and the emergent macrophyte Typha domingensis (Td); (iv) with a substrate and without T. domingensis (WTd). To verify the efficiency of CWs, the removal rates of total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved (DKN) and total (TKN) Kjeldahl nitrogen, total inorganic nitrogen (TIN), total phosphorus (TP) and P-orthophosphate (P-ORT) were analysed using ANOVA-rm. The removal of TP and TKN was higher in CWs with substrate than without substrate. The removal of P-ORT, TIN and DKN was higher in Ec compared to others CWs. The average removal of TSS in Ec (78.9%), WTd (77.4%) and Td (75.0%) was higher than in WEc (68.3%). The contribution of E. crassipes towards the removal of all forms of N and P was higher than of T. domingensis. This greater contribution of E. crassipes can be due to the higher biomass that this species gained in comparison with T. domingensis. Citing Literature Volume49, Issue10October 2018Pages 3468-3476 RelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX