Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the glenohumeral joint: a case report

2018; Elsevier BV; Volume: 27; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.013

1532-6500

Jay R. Ebert, Michael B. Fallon, Minghao Zheng, Aaron Tay,

Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a 2-stage surgical technique used to address full-thickness, symptomatic chondral lesions. Initially, it involves a cartilage biopsy, isolation and expansion of chondrocytes ex vivo, and subsequent reimplantation into the damaged joint. Chondrocyte-seeded porcine collagen membrane as graft composite is considered the next-generation ACI technique, and the cell-seeded graft can be fixed to the subchondral bone without suture. Encouraging clinical outcomes using a chondrocyte-seeded collagen membrane (matrix-induced ACI) have been reported in the knee 4 Behrens P. Bitter T. Kurz B. Russlies M. Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)—5-year follow-up. Knee. 2006; 13: 194-202http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.012 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (386) Google Scholar , 10 Ebert J.R. Robertson W.B. Woodhouse J. Fallon M. Zheng M.H. Ackland T. et al. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging-based outcomes to 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation to address articular cartilage defects in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 753-763http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546510390476 Crossref PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar , 14 Genovese E. Ronga M. Angeretti M.G. Novario R. Leonardi A. Albrizio M. et al. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2010; 40: 47-56http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0939-8 Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar , 24 Kon E. Di Martino A. Filardo G. Tetta C. Busacca M. Iacono F. et al. Second-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation: MRI findings and clinical correlations at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79: 382-388http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.002 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar , 32 Nehrer S. Dorotka R. Domayer S. Stelzeneder D. Kotz R. Treatment of full-thickness chondral defects with hyalograft C in the knee: a prospective clinical case series with 2 to 7 years' follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 81S-87Shttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546509350704 Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar , 43 Saris D.B. Vanlauwe J. Victor J. Almqvist K.F. Verdonk R. Bellemans J. et al. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 10S-19Shttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546509350694 Crossref PubMed Scopus (403) Google Scholar and ankle. 8 Dixon S. Harvey L. Baddour E. Janes G. Hardisty G. Functional outcome of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 368-374http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0368 Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar , 15 Giannini S. Buda R. Ruffilli A. Cavallo M. Pagliazzi G. Bulzamini M.C. et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22: 1311-1319http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2640-7 Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar , 17 Giza E. Sullivan M. Ocel D. Lundeen G. Mitchell M.E. Veris L. et al. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus articular defects. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31: 747-753http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0747 Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar , 27 Kreulen C. Giza E. Walton J. Sullivan M. Seven-year follow-up of matrix-induced autologous implantation in talus articular defects. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017; 11: 133-137http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1938640017713614 Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar , 34 Pagliazzi G. Vannini F. Battaglia M. Ramponi L. Buda R. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for talar osteochondral lesions: comparison between 5-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging findings and 7-year follow-up clinical results. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 57: 221-225http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.013 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar With the development of surgical techniques, both knee ACI and ankle ACI permit arthroscopic delivery of the scaffold, 9 Ebert J.R. Fallon M. Wood D.J. Janes G.C. A prospective clinical and radiological evaluation at 5 years after arthroscopic matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 59-69http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546516663493 Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar , 12 Erggelet C. Sittinger M. Lahm A. The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 108-110http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jars.2003.50025 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar , 13 Ferruzzi A. Buda R. Faldini C. Vannini F. Di Caprio F. Luciani D. et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee joint: open compared with arthroscopic technique. Comparison at a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 90-101http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00633 Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar , 15 Giannini S. Buda R. Ruffilli A. Cavallo M. Pagliazzi G. Bulzamini M.C. et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22: 1311-1319http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2640-7 Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar , 16 Giannini S. Buda R. Vannini F. Di Caprio F. Grigolo B. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 873-880http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546507312644 Crossref PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar , 20 Ibarra C. Izaguirre A. Villalobos E. Masri M. Lombardero G. Martinez V. et al. Follow-up of a new arthroscopic technique for implantation of matrix-encapsulated autologous chondrocytes in the knee. Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 715-723http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.032 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar , 24 Kon E. Di Martino A. Filardo G. Tetta C. Busacca M. Iacono F. et al. Second-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation: MRI findings and clinical correlations at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79: 382-388http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.002 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar , 25 Kon E. Filardo G. Berruto M. Benazzo F. Zanon G. Della Villa S. et al. Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players: a prospective comparative study of arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 2549-2557http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546511420688 Crossref PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar , 26 Kon E. Gobbi A. Filardo G. Delcogliano M. Zaffagnini S. Marcacci M. Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 33-41http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546508323256 Crossref PubMed Scopus (313) Google Scholar , 29 Marcacci M. Kon E. Zaffagnini S. Filardo G. Delcogliano M. Neri M.P. et al. Arthroscopic second generation autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15: 610-619http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0265-9 Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar , 35 Petersen W. Zelle S. Zantop T. Arthroscopic implantation of a three dimensional scaffold for autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128: 505-508http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0348-1 Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar , 40 Ronga M. Grassi F.A. Bulgheroni P. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of a chondral defect in the tibial plateau of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 79-84http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.012 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar which may permit accelerated rehabilitation and minimize the morbidity of arthrotomy, including reducing the risk of complications such as adhesions, joint stiffness, excessive pain, and scarring.