Artigo Revisado por pares

Novel strategies in aortic valve-in-valve therapy including bioprosthetic valve fracture and BASILICA

2018; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions; Volume: 14; Issue: AB Linguagem: Inglês

10.4244/eij-d-18-00667

ISSN

1969-6213

Autores

Danny Dvir, Jaffar M. Khan, Ran Kornowski, Ikki Komatsu, Adnan Chatriwalla, G Burkhard Mackenson, Matheus Simonato, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, David A. Wood, Jonathon Leipsic, John G. Webb, Darren Mylotte,

Tópico(s)

Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Resumo

An ageing population and increased utilisation of tissue valves in younger patients imply that the number of patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation within failed bioprostheses will continue to increase. There are two major adverse events associated with aortic valve-in-valve procedures that may temper the enthusiasm for these appealing interventions. Residual stenosis is the "Achilles' heel" of aortic valve-in-valve, while coronary obstruction is an uncommon but life-threatening adverse event. Prevention of these adverse events is essential. Emerging tools and techniques enable operators to manipulate existing devices and to implant new ones inside them safely. Considering the available evidence, it seems that bioprosthetic valve ring fracture and bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction (BASILICA) may enable some solution. Until we have prosthetic valves that are both very durable and non-thrombogenic, we can expect that techniques and tools chosen to treat failed bioprosthetic valves effectively will continue to be designed and utilised.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX