Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

VEGFR2 cytoplasmic expression (VEGFR2ce) in relation to survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab (Bev).

2017; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 35; Issue: 15_suppl Linguagem: Inglês

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.11523

1527-7755

Roseana Melo Borba, Tiago Cordeiro Felismino, Alexandre André Balieiro Anastácio da Costa, Vladmir Cláudio Cordeiro de Lima, Marcelo Corassa, Stephania Martins Bezerra, Cynthia Bueno de Toledo Osorio, Tadeu Ferreira Paiva,

Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

11523 Background: Bev is a monoclonal antibody that binds to VEGFA that demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) in MBC clinical trials. VEGFR2, NOTCH1, Integrin a1b2 and ILK are angiogenesis-related proteins possibly related with Bev efficacy. The correlation of these proteins expression and Bev survival variables was evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1 st line chemotherapy in two HER2 negative MBC cohorts. Pts were treated between May-07 and July-14. Cohort 1 (C1) was treated with paclitaxel and Cohort 2 (C2) with paclitaxel and Bev. Expression of biomarkers was determined by immunohistochemistry. Tumor samples were arranged on a tissue microarray. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox model was used in multivariate analysis. Results: C1 had 42 pts. Median age was 63y. Tumor subtypes were divided in luminal (92.9%) and triple negative (TN) (7.1%). Visceral metastasis (mets) were present in 71.4%. Median follow-up (mFUP) time was 32.1m. mPFS was 8.0m and mOS was 33.5m. C2 had 29 pts. Median age was 57y. Luminal 79.3%; TN 20.7%; Visceral mets 79.3%; mFUP 38m. mPFS was 10.5m and mOS was 47m. In C2, high VEGFR2ce was correlated with improved PFS (high VEGFR2 16.5m x low VEGFR2 6.8m, p = 0.025). Breast cancer subtype, metastasis pattern and VEGFR2 expression were included in the multivariate analysis for PFS. VEGFR2 remained as independent factor (HR 0.35; IC95% 0.14 – 0.85, p = 0.021). In C1, VEGFR2 was not correlated with improved PFS (high VEGFR2 8.6m x low VEGFR2 8.0m, p = 0.24). Other markers were not associated with PFS. Conclusions: High VEGFR2ce was associated with increased PFS in patients treated with Bev. In MBC VEGFR2 may have a role as a predictive tool on benefit of antiangiogenic therapy.