Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Rationale and design of the EU‐CERT‐ICD prospective study: comparative effectiveness of prophylactic ICD implantation

2018; Wiley; Volume: 6; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/ehf2.12367

2055-5822

Markus Zabel, Christian Sticherling, Rik Willems, Andrzej Lubiński, Axel Bauer, Leonard Bergau, Frieder Braunschweig, Josép Brugada, Sandro Brusich, David Conen, Iwona Cygankiewicz, Panagiota Flevari, Miloš Táborský, Jim Hansen, Gerd Hasenfuß, Róbert Hatala, Heikki V. Huikuri, Svetoslav Iovev, Stefan Kääb, Gabriela Kaliská, Jarosław D. Kasprzak, Lars Lüthje, Marek Malík, Tomáš Novotný, Nikola Pavlović, Georg Schmidt, Tchavdar Shalganov, Rajeeva Sritharan, Simon Schlögl, Janko Szavits Nossan, Vassil Traykov, Anton E. Tuinenburg, Vasil Velchev, Marc A. Vos, Stefan N. Willich, Tim Friede, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Béla Merkely,

Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Abstract Aims The clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is under debate. The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (EU‐CERT‐ICD) aims to assess its current clinical value. Methods and results The EU‐CERT‐ICD is a prospective investigator‐initiated non‐randomized, controlled, multicentre observational cohort study performed in 44 centres across 15 European Union countries. We will recruit 2250 patients with ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and a guideline indication for primary prophylactic ICD implantation. This sample will include 1500 patients at their first ICD implantation and 750 patients who did not receive a primary prevention ICD despite having an indication for it (non‐randomized control group). The primary endpoint is all‐cause mortality; the co‐primary endpoint in ICD patients is time to first appropriate shock. Secondary endpoints include sudden cardiac death, first inappropriate shock, any ICD shock, arrhythmogenic syncope, revision procedures, quality of life, and cost‐effectiveness. At baseline (and prior to ICD implantation if applicable), all patients undergo 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter ECG analysis using multiple advanced methods for risk stratification as well as detailed documentation of clinical characteristics and laboratory values. Genetic biobanking is also organized. As of August 2018, baseline data of 2265 patients are complete. All subjects will be followed for up to 4.5 years. Conclusions The EU‐CERT‐ICD study will provide a necessary update about clinical effectiveness of primary prophylactic ICD implantation. This study also aims for improved risk stratification and patient selection using clinical and ECG risk markers.