Artigo Revisado por pares

Managing Basin‐Scale Fluid Budgets to Reduce Injection‐Induced Seismicity from the Recent U.S. Shale Oil Revolution

2018; Seismological Society of America; Volume: 90; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1785/0220180223

ISSN

1938-2057

Autores

Bridget R. Scanlon, M. Weingarten, Kyle E. Murray, R. C. Reedy,

Tópico(s)

Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods

Resumo

Research Article| October 31, 2018 Managing Basin‐Scale Fluid Budgets to Reduce Injection‐Induced Seismicity from the Recent U.S. Shale Oil Revolution Bridget R. Scanlon; Bridget R. Scanlon aBureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Pickle Research Campus, Building 130, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A., bridget.scanlon@beg.utexas.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Matthew B. Weingarten; Matthew B. Weingarten bDepartment of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182‐1020 U.S.A.dAlso at Department of Geophysics, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Kyle E. Murray; Kyle E. Murray cOklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma, 100 E Boyd Street, Suite N131, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert C. Reedy Robert C. Reedy aBureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Pickle Research Campus, Building 130, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A., bridget.scanlon@beg.utexas.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Bridget R. Scanlon aBureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Pickle Research Campus, Building 130, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A., bridget.scanlon@beg.utexas.edu Matthew B. Weingarten bDepartment of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182‐1020 U.S.A.dAlso at Department of Geophysics, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305 U.S.A. Kyle E. Murray cOklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma, 100 E Boyd Street, Suite N131, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 U.S.A. Robert C. Reedy aBureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Pickle Research Campus, Building 130, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A., bridget.scanlon@beg.utexas.edu Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 31 Oct 2018 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (1): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180223 Article history First Online: 31 Oct 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Bridget R. Scanlon, Matthew B. Weingarten, Kyle E. Murray, Robert C. Reedy; Managing Basin‐Scale Fluid Budgets to Reduce Injection‐Induced Seismicity from the Recent U.S. Shale Oil Revolution. Seismological Research Letters 2018;; 90 (1): 171–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180223 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT With the U.S. unconventional oil revolution, adverse impacts from subsurface disposal of coproduced water, such as induced seismicity, have markedly increased, particularly in Oklahoma. Here, we adopt a new, more holistic analysis by linking produced water (PW) volumes, disposal, and seismicity in all major U.S. unconventional oil plays (Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Permian plays, and Oklahoma) and provide guidance for long‐term management. Results show that monthly PW injection volumes doubled across the plays since 2009. We show that the shift in PW disposal to nonproducing geologic zones related to low‐permeability unconventional reservoirs is a fundamental driver of induced seismicity. We statistically associate seismicity in Oklahoma to (1) PW injection rates, (2) cumulative PW volumes, and (3) proximity to basement with updated data through 2017. The major difference between intensive seismicity in Oklahoma versus low seismicity levels in the Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Permian Basin plays is attributed to proximity to basement with deep injection near basement in Oklahoma relative to shallower injection distant from basement in other plays. Directives to mitigate Oklahoma seismicity are consistent with our findings: reducing (1) PW injection rates and (2) regional injection volumes by 40% relative to the 2014 total in wells near the basement, which resulted in a 70% reduction in the number of M≥3.0 earthquakes in 2017 relative to the 2015 peak seismicity. Understanding linkages between PW management and seismicity allows us to develop a portfolio of strategies to reduce future adverse impacts of PW management, including reuse of PW for hydraulic fracturing in the oil and gas sector. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX