Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Digital government

2010; Wiley; Volume: 44; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/aris.2010.1440440115

1550-8382

Scott P. Robertson, Ravi Vatrapu,

Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Annual Review of Information Science and TechnologyVolume 44, Issue 1 p. 317-364 Section III: Communication Digital government Scott P. Robertson, Scott P. Robertson University of Hawaii at ManoaSearch for more papers by this authorRavi K. Vatrapu, Ravi K. Vatrapu Copenhagen Business School, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author Scott P. Robertson, Scott P. Robertson University of Hawaii at ManoaSearch for more papers by this authorRavi K. Vatrapu, Ravi K. Vatrapu Copenhagen Business School, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author First published: 18 January 2012 https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440115Citations: 22Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Abramson, J. B., Arterton, F. C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books. Adamic, L.A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery (pp. 36–43). New York: ACM Press. Agre, P. E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18(5), 311–331. Alvarez, R. M., & Hall, T. E. (2004). Point, click and vote: The future of Internet voting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Anderson, S., Bohman, P. R., Burmeister, O. K., & Sampson-Wild, G. (2004). User needs and e-government accessibility: The future impact of WCAG 2.0. In C. Stary & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), User-centered interaction paradigms for universal access in the information society: 8th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All: Revised selected papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3196) (pp. 289–304). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Ansolabehere, S. (2001). Voting machines, race, and equal protection. Election Law Journal, 1(1), 61–70. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., & Behr, R. (1993). The media game: American politics in the television age. New York: Macmillan. Ansolabehere, S., & Stewart, C. (2004). Residual votes attributable to voting technologies. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 365–389. Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso. Aurigi, A. (2000). Digital city or urban simulator? In T. Ishida & K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1765) (pp. 33–44). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Aurigi, A. (2005). Making the digital city: The early shaping of urban Internet space. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Ayers, J. M. (1999). From the streets to the Internet: The cyber-diffusion of contention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 132–143. Bederson, B., Lee, B., Sherman, R. M., Herrnson, P. S., & Niemi, R. G. (2003). Electronic voting system usability issues. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 145–152. Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T. (2006). User centered e-government: Challenges and benefits of government Web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 163–168. Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government: From vision to implementation: A practical guide with case studies. London: Sage. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133–160. Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Borning, A., Friedman, B., Davis, J., & Lin, P. (2005). Informing public deliberation: Value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 449–468. Borning, A., & Waddell, P. (2006). UrbanSim: Interaction and participation in integrated urban land use, transportation, and environmental modeling. Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference (pp. 133–134). New York: ACM Press. Borning, A., Waddell, P., & Förster, R. (2008). Urbanism: Using simulation to inform public deliberation and decision-making. In H. Chen, L. Brandt, V. Gregg, R. Traunmüller, S. Dawes, E. Hovy, et al. (Eds.), Digital government: E-Government research, case studies, and implementation (pp. 440–465). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Bowyer, K. W. (2004). Face recognition technology: Security versus privacy. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(1), 9–19. Cahan, B., & Ball, M. (2002). GIS at Groud Zero: Spatial technology bolsters World Trade Center response and recovery. GEO World, 15(1), 26–29. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1996). Developing the Blacksburg electronic village. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 69–74. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265306 Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2006). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation, and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266. Center for Technology in Government (2008). Enabling e-government: Overview. Albany, NY: The Center. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.ctg.albany.edu/themes/themes?chapter=egov Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "E-government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union, Governance, 16(2), 271–300. Chen, H. (2002). Digital government: Technologies and practices. Decision Support Systems, 34, 223–227. Chen, X. (2002). The E_GOV action plan in Beijing. In T. Ishida & K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1765) (pp. 69–74). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Choudrie, J., & Ghinea, G. (2005). Integrated views of e-government website usability: Perspectives from users and Web diagnostic tools. Electronic Government, 2(3), 318–333. Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 431–453. Clinton, W. J. (1993). United States Advisory Council on the National Information Infrastructure (Executive Order 12864). Federal Register, 58(179). Retrieved March 30, 2009, from www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12864.pdf Clinton, W. J. (1999). Presidential electronic commerce performance mandate. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from www.gov.com/about_memo19991227.html Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. (2008). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society. Commission of the European Communities. (2003). The role of eGovernment for Europe's future. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/egov_communication_en.pdf Craglia, M., & Masser, I. (2002). Geographic information and the enlargement of the European Union: Four national case studies. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 14(2), 43–52. Craig, T., & Shear, M. D. (2006, August 15). Allen quip provokes outrage, apology. Washington Post, A01. Cresswell, A. M., & Pardo, T. (2001). Implications of legal and organizational issues for urban digital government development. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 269–278. Cutter, S. L. (2003). GI science, disasters, and emergency management. Transactions on GIS, 7(4), 439–445. S. L. Cutter, D. B. Richardson, & T. J. Wilbanks (Eds.). (2003). Geographical dimensions of terrorism. New York: Routledge. Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved January 29, 2009, from jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html D'Alessio, D. (1997). Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US election. Electoral Studies, 16(4), 489–500. Dawes, S. S. (2002). The future of e-government. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/future_of_egov/future_of_egov.pdf Dawes, S. S., Bloniarz, P. A., Kelly, K. L., & Fletcher, P. D. (2002). Some assembly required: Building a digital government for the 21st century. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research (ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 129), 1–39. Dawes, S. S., Gregg, V., & Agouris, P. (2004). Digital government research: Investigations at the crossroads of social and information science. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 5–10. Dawes, S. S., & Préfontaine, L. (2003, January). Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 40–42. Devadoss, P. R., Pan, S. L., & Huang, J. C. (2002). Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34, 253–269. Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3(3), 386–401. Dill, D. L., Schneier, B., & Simons, B. (2003). Voting and technology: Who gets to count your vote? Communications of the ACM, 46(8), 29–31. Doctor, R. (1992). Social equity and information technologies: Moving toward information democracy. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 27, 43–96. Downing, J. (1989). Computers for political change: Peacenet and public data access. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 154–162. Druckman, J., Kifer, M., & Parkin, M. (2007). The technological development of Congressional candidate websites: How and why candidates use Web innovations. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 425–442. Dulio, D. A., Goff, D. L., & Thurber, J. A. (1999). Untangled Web: Internet use during the 1998 election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(1), 53–58. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley. Edsall, T. B., & Faler, B. (2002, December 11). Lott remarks on Thurmond echoed 1980 words. Washington Post, A06. Egelman, S., & Cranor, L. (2005). The Real ID Act: Fixing identity documents with duct tape. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 2(1), 149–183. Eggers, W. (2005). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Election Data Services. (2006). 2006 voting equipment study. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.electiondataservices.com/images/File/VotingEquipStudies%20/ve2006_news.pdf Elmagarmid, A. K., & McIver, W. J., Jr. (2001). The ongoing march toward digital government. IEEE Computer, 34(2), 32–38. European Union. (1999). eEurope: An information society for all. Communication on a Commission Initiative for the Special European Council of Lisbon. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. March. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/2002/english.pdf European Union. (2000). eEurope 2002: An information society for all: Action Plan. Prepared by the Council and the European Commission for the Feira European Council. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/2002/action_plan/actionplan_en.pdf European Union. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all: An Action Plan. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52002DC0263:EN:NOT European Union. (2003). eEurope 2002 Final Report. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52003DC0066:EN:NOT European Union. (2005). i2010: A European information society for growth and employment. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: The Commission. Evans, D., & Paul, N. (2004). Election security: Perception and reality. IEEE Security and Privacy, 2(1), 24–31. Fang, Z. (1997). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1–22. Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. W. (2007). The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 15–30. Farrington, C., & Pine, E. (1997). Community memory: A case study in community communication. In P. E. Agre & D. Shuler (Eds.), Reinventing technology, rediscovering community: Critical explorations of computing as a social practice (pp. 219–228). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. Fischer, E. A. (2003). Election reform and electronic voting systems (DREs): Analysis of security issues (Congressional Research Service Report RL32139). Washington, DC: The Library of Congress. Flak, L. S., Sein, M. K., & Sæbø, Ø. (2007). Towards a cumulative tradition in e-government research: Going beyond the Gs and Cs. Electronic Government: 6th International Conference, EGOV 2007, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4656) (pp. 13–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2002). Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the U.S. political Web sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 222–244. Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2006). Online campaigning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Foot, K. A., Schneider, S. M., Dougherty, M., Xenos, M., & Larsen, E. (2003). Analyzing linking practices: Candidate sites in the 2002 US electoral Web sphere. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(4). Retrieved January 3, 2009, from jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/foot.html Forlano, L. (2004). The emergence of digital government: International perspectives. In A. Pavlichev & G. D. Garson (Eds.), Digital government: Principles and best practices (pp. 34–51). London: Idea Group. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Fountain, J. E. (2006). Central issues in the political development of the virtual state. In M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), The network society: From knowledge to policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Garramone, G. M., Harris, A. C., & Anderson, R. (1986). Uses of political computer bulletin boards. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30(3), 325–339. Garson, D. (2006). Public information technology and e-governance. Boston: Jones & Bartlett. Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290. Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. Goswami, P. R. (2002). Literacy, information, and governance in the digital era: An Indian scenario. International Information & Library Review, 34(3), 255–270. Government Paperwork Elimination Act of 1998, 44 U.S.C.A. § 3504 n. (West Supp. 1999). Graafland-Essers, I., & Ettedgui, E. (2003). Benchmarking e-Government in Europe and the US (SIBUS Report IST-2000-26276). Leiden, The Netherlands: RAND Europe. Grönlund, Ä., & Horan, T. (2005). Introducing e-GOV: History, definitions and issues. Communications of the AIS, 15, 713–729. Habermas, J. (1991a). The public sphere. In C. Mukerji & M. Schudson (Eds.), Rethinking popular culture: Contemporary perspectives in cultural studies (pp. 398–404). Berkeley: University of California Press. Habermas, J. (1991b). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society ( T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hansen, M. (1993). Early cinema, late cinema: Permutations of the public sphere. Screen, 34(3), 197–210. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing eGovernment research. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 243–265. Herrnson, P., Bederson, B. B., & Abbe, O. (2002). An evaluation of Maryland's new voting machines. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for American Politics and Citizenship/Human Computer Interaction Lab. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.capc.umd.edu/rpts/MD_EVoteEval.pdf Herrnson, P. S., Bederson, B. B., Lee, B., Francia, P. L., Sherman, R. M., Conrad, F. G., et al. (2005). Early appraisals of electronic voting. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 274–292. Herrnson, P. S., Niemi, R. G., Hanmer, M. J., Bederson, B. B., Conrad, F. G., & Traugott, M. (2006). The importance of usability testing of voting systems. Proceedings of the Usenix/Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (August 1, 2006, Vancouver, B.C., Canada). Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.usenix.org/events/evt06/tech/full_papers/herrnson/herrnson.pdf Herrnson, P. S., Niemi, R. G., Hanmer, M. J., Francia, P., Bederson, B., Conrad, F. G., et al. (2005, April). The promise and pitfalls of electronic voting: Results from a usability field test. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. Hetherington, M. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote. American Political Science Review, 93, 311–326. J. R. Hibbing, & E. Theiss-Morse (Eds.). (2001). What is it about government that Americans dislike? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hiller, J. S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. In M. A. Abramson & G. E. Means (Eds.), E-government 2001 (pp. 162–198). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 325–344. Horrigan, J. (2004). How Americans get in touch with government (Pew Internet and American Life Project Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2004/PIP_E-Gov_Report_0504.pdf.pdf Ishida, T. (2000). Understanding digital cities. In T. Ishida & K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1765) (pp. 7–17). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Ishida, T., Aurigi, A., & Yasuoka, M. (2003). World digital cities: Beyond heterogeneity. In P. van den Besselaar & S. Koizumi (Eds.), Digital Cities III: Information technologies for social capital: Cross-cultural perspectives: Third International Digital Cities Workshop, Revised Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3081) (pp. 184–198). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Jaeger, P. T. (2003a). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331. Jaeger, P. T. (2003b). The importance of measuring the accessibility of the federal e-government: What studies are missing and how these issues can be addressed. Information Technology and Disabilities, 9(1). Retrieved January 29, 2009, from people.rit.edu/easi/itd/itdv09n1/jaeger.htm Jaeger, P. T. (2005). Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 702–719. Jaeger, P. T. (2006a). Assessing Section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 169–190. Jaeger, P. T. (2006b). Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 112–124. Jaeger, P. T., & Bowman, C. A. (2005). Understanding disability: Inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights. Westport, CT: Praeger. Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and new directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. Jong, M., & Lentz, L. (2005). Scenario evaluation of municipal Web sites: Development and use of an expert-focused evaluation tool. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 191–206. Kamarck, E. C. (1999). Campaigning on the Internet in the elections of 1998. In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), Democracy.com Governance in the network world (pp. 99–123). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing. Kavanaugh, A., Schmitz, J., Zin, T. T., Perez-Quinones, M., Carroll, J. M., & Isenhour, P. (2006). When opinion leaders blog: New forms of citizen interaction. Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, 79–88. Klein, H. K. (1999). Tocqueville in cyberspace: Using the Internet for citizen associations. Information Society, 15(4), 213–220. Knack, K., & Kropf, M. (2002). Who uses inferior voting technology? Political Science and Politics, 35, 541–548. Kohno, T., Stubblefield, A., Rubin, A., & Wallach, D. (2004). Analysis of an electronic voting system. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 27–42. Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5(1), 63–76. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face (book) in the crowd: Social searching and social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 167–170. Lauer, T. W. (2004). The risk of e-voting. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 2(3), 177–186. Lawrence, R. Z. (1997). Is it really the economy stupid? In J. S. Nye (Ed.), Why people don't trust government (pp. 111–132). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. Lievrouw, L. A., & Farb, S. (2003). Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 499–540. Lips, M. (2001). Designing electronic government around the world: Policy developments in the USA, Singapore, and Australia. In J. E. J. Prins (Ed.), Designing e-government: On the crossroads of technological innovation and institutional change (pp. 75–89). Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International. Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2001). Geographic information systems and science. Chichester, UK: Wiley. P. Ludlow (Ed.). (2001). Crypto anarchy, cyberstates, and pirate utopias. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ma, L., Chung, J., & Thorson, S. (2004). E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 20–37. Maguire, D. J., & Longley, P. A. (2004). The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(1), 3–14. Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2005). Agency internets and changing dynamics of congressional oversight. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(7/8), 553–565. Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2006). Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency websites. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 505–521. Malhotra, Y., Al-Shehri, A., & Jones, J. J. (1995). National Information Infrastructure: Myths, metaphors and realities. New York: BRINT Institute. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from www.brint.com/papers/nii Mapping Sciences Committee. (1993). Towards a coordinated spatial data infrastructure for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn't what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74–86. Marchionini, G., Craig, A., Brandt, L., Klavans, J., & Chen, H. (2001). Digital libraries supporting digital government. Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 395–397. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from doi.acm.org/10.1145/379437.379733 Marchionini, G., Samet, H., & Brandt, L. (2003). Introduction to a special issue on digital government. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 24–27. Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. (2003). The uses of trust in information science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 465–498. Masser, I. (1999). All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(1), 67–84. W. J. McIver, & A. K. Elmagarmid (Eds.). (2001). Advances in digital government: Technology, human factors, and policy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. Meadow, R. G. (1986). The electronic machine: New technologies in political campaigns. Election Politics, 3(3), 26–31. Mercuri, R. T. (2002). A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum, 39(10), 46–50. Mercuri, R. T., & Neumann, P. G. (2002). Verification for electronic balloting systems. In D. Gritzalis (Ed.), Secure electronic voting: Advances in information security (Vol. 7, pp. 31–42). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Miller, B. (1996, November). European cities link to improve quality of life. Government Technology. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from www.govtech.com/gt/95828 Moeller, M. (1993). Technology: Data superhighway. Communications International, 20(7), 16, 20. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?