Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Why We Should Stop Measuring Performance and Well-Being

2020; Hogrefe Verlag; Volume: 64; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1026/0932-4089/a000333

2190-6270

P. Matthijs Bal,

Workplace Health and Well-being

Why We Should Stop Measuring Performance and Well-BeingP. Matthijs BalP. Matthijs Balhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-2837University of Lincoln, United KingdomPublished Online:July 30, 2020https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000333PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreLiteraturBal, M. (2017). Dignity in the workplace: New theoretical perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarBal, P. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2017). From human resource management to human dignity development: A dignity perspective on HRM and the role of workplace democracy. In M. KosteraM. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and organizations (pp. 173 – 195). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave McMillan. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarBal, P. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2018). Create more value for all: A human dignity oriented approach to consulting. In G. ManvillO. MatthiaJ. Campbell (Eds.), Management consultancy insights and real consultancy projects (pp. 39 – 50). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarBal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 536 – 548. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarCabanas, E., & Illouz, E. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens: How the science and industry of happiness control our lives. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarDalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), 1241 – 1255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarDóci, E., & Bal, P. M. (2018). Ideology in work and organizational psychology: The responsibility of the researcher. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (5), 558 – 560. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarKozlowski, S. W., Chen, G., & Salas, E. (2017). One hundred years of the Journal of Applied Psychology: Background, evolution, and scientific trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (3), 237 – 253. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarLefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should… expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (4), 439 – 453. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarMelé, D. (2012). The firm as a "community of persons": A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106 (1), 89 – 101. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarStiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York, USA: WW Norton & Company. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarVoorde, K. van de, Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well‐being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14 (4), 391 – 407. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarWilliams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17 (3), 601 – 617. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarŽižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London, UK: Verso. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarŽižek, S. (2014). Trouble in paradise: From the end of history to the end of capitalism . London, UK: Melville House. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 64Issue 3Juli 2020ISSN: 0932-4089eISSN: 2190-6270 InformationZeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O (2020), 64, pp. 196-200 https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000333.© 2020Hogrefe VerlagPDF download