Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Applications of Antimicrobial 3D Printing Materials in Space

2019; Future Medicine; Volume: 3; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2217/3dp-2019-0001

2059-4763

Jorge M. Zuñiga, Michael Thompson,

Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

Journal of 3D Printing in MedicineVol. 3, No. 1 CommentaryApplications of antimicrobial 3D printing materials in spaceJorge M Zuniga & Michael ThompsonJorge M Zuniga*Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: jmzuniga@unomaha.edu Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, 68182, USA Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile & Michael Thompson Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, 68182, USAPublished Online:19 Feb 2019https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2019-0001AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleKeywords: medical devices in spacemicrobial risk countermeasureNASAon-orbit fabricationprolonged space missionsReferences1 Crucian BE, Choukèr A, Simpson RJ et al. Immune system dysregulation during spaceflight: potential countermeasures for deep space exploration missions. Front. Immunol. 9, 1437–1437 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Crucian BE, Zwart SR, Mehta S et al. Plasma cytokine concentrations indicate that in vivo hormonal regulation of immunity is altered during long-duration spaceflight. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 34(10), 778–786 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 NASA. Efficacy of antimicrobials on bacteria cultured in a spaceflight analog (2018). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20140006963.pdf.Google Scholar4 Wong JY, Pfahnl AC. 3D printing of surgical instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 85(7), 758–763 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Prater T, Werkheiser N, Ledbetter F, Timucin D, Wheeler K, Snyder M. 3D printing in Zero G technology demonstration mission: complete experimental results and summary of related material modeling efforts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2827-7 (2018) (Epub ahead of print).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Wong JY. On-site 3D printing of functional custom mallet splints for mars analogue crewmembers. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perf. 86(10), 911–914 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Zuniga J. 3D printed antibacterial prostheses. Appl. Sci. 8(9), 1651 (2018).Crossref, Google Scholar8 Godymchuk A, Frolov G, Gusev A et al. Antibacterial properties of copper nanoparticle dispersions: influence of synthesis conditions and physicochemical characteristics. IOP Conference Series. 98(1), 012033 (2015).Crossref, Google Scholar9 Palza H. Antimicrobial polymers with metal nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16(1), 2099–2116 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Muwaffak Z, Goyanes A, Clark V, Basit AW, Hilton ST, Gaisford S. Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. Int. J. Pharm. 527(1–2), 161–170 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11 Gadi B, Jeffrey G. Copper as a biocidal tool. Curr. Med. Chem. 12(18), 2163–2175 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Liu Y, He L, Mustapha A, Li H, Hu ZQ, Lin M. Antibacterial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107(4), 1193–1201 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13 Zuniga JM, Katsavelis D, Peck J et al. Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences. BMC Res. 8(1), 10 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Viegas SF, Williams D, Jones J, Strauss S, Clark J. Physical demands and injuries to the upper extremity associated with the space program. J. Hand Surg. 29(3), 359–366 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Scheuring RA, Mathers CH, Jones JA, Wear ML. Musculoskeletal injuries and minor trauma in space: incidence and injury mechanisms in U.S. astronauts. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 80(2), 117–124 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Kondor S, Grant CG, Liacouras P et al. On demand additive manufacturing of a basic surgical kit. J. Med. Devices 7(3), 030916-030916-030912 (2013).Crossref, Google Scholar17 Wong JY, Pfahnl AC. 3D printed surgical instruments evaluated by a simulated crew of a Mars mission. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perf. 87(9), 806–810 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByBioinspired Interlayer Adhesion Strategy for Additive Manufacturing in Space19 January 2023 | Advanced Engineering Materials, Vol. 9823D Printing as a Technological Strategy for the Personalized Treatment of Wound Healing25 January 2023 | AAPS PharmSciTech, Vol. 24, No. 1Influence of design and material characteristics on 3D printed flow-cells for heat transfer-based analytical devices24 January 2022 | Microchimica Acta, Vol. 189, No. 2Embracing Additive Manufacturing Technology through Fused Filament Fabrication for Antimicrobial with Enhanced Formulated Materials9 May 2021 | Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 9Future directions in biomechanics: 3D printing Vol. 3, No. 1 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 65 times History Received 9 January 2017 Accepted 22 January 2018 Published online 19 February 2019 Published in print March 2019 Information© 2019 Future Medicine LtdKeywordsmedical devices in spacemicrobial risk countermeasureNASAon-orbit fabricationprolonged space missionsFinancial & competing interests disclosureThis study was funded by NASA Nebraska Space Grant Office (Federal Award #NNX15AI09H). Copper3D Inc. donated the antibacterial 3D-printed filament for our laboratory research. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No funded writing assistance has been used in the creation of this manuscript.PDF download