Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Interaction Between Ischemic Time and Donor Age on Adult Heart Transplant Outcomes in the Modern Era

2019; Elsevier BV; Volume: 108; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.042

1552-6259

Mohan M. John, Wendy Shih, Dennys Estevez, Timothy P. Martens, Leonard L. Bailey, Anees J. Razzouk, David G. Rabkin,

Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Background We examined the effect of cold ischemic interval on modern outcomes to determine whether advances in patient management have made an impact. Methods Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we reviewed adult heart transplants between January 2000 and March 2016. We divided donor age into terciles: younger than 18 years, 18 to 33 years, and 34 years and older. Within each tercile, transplants were divided by cold ischemic interval of less than 4 hours, 4 to 6 hours, and more than 6 hours. Survival curves were compared between cold ischemic interval categories within each tercile. Covariate-adjusted and donor age-stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate overall mortality and graft failure hazards ratios. Results Of 29,192 transplants, no significant differences between cold ischemic interval groups in survival or graft failure were apparent in the group aged younger than 18. For donors older than 18, significant differences were found for survival and graft failure with cold ischemic interval exceeding 4 hours in both univariate and multivariate analysis, and survival functions at different ischemic intervals continued to diverge beyond 1 year. The interaction effect between donor age and cold ischemic interval on overall mortality was not significant when analyzed as continuous variables, however younger donor age appeared to attenuate increase in overall mortality with longer cold ischemic intervals. Conclusions Despite advances in perioperative management during the past 30 years, for donors older than 18 years, cold ischemic interval exceeding 4 hours is associated with gradual but significantly diminished survival that persists well beyond the perioperative period. Comparison to historical data suggests that advances in management have somewhat attenuated the hazard associated with longer ischemic times.